Wolfram Syndrome-2, a Cause of Severe Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Series and a Literature Review.

Background: There are very few reports of Wolfram syndrome-2 (WFS2) in the literature, and understanding of involvement of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the syndrome is limited. Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations of a large number of WFS2 patients with specific focus on their GI manifestations. Methods: This is a retrospective case series study. Patients who were homozygous for the CISD2 gene mutation were identified through the genetic department of Al-Makassed hospital. Their medical records were reviewed, and biometric data have been obtained. The data were collected and arranged on a data sheet, and descriptive analysis was done using SPSS. Results: Thirteen patients from 9 families were identified; diabetes mellitus was present in 6 of them, optic atrophy in 5, diabetes insipidus (DI) in 5, and deafness in 2. All of the patients had GI manifestations with abnormal findings on upper endoscopy. Dysmorphic facial features and abnormal findings on brain MRI were present in 3 of our patients. The GI manifestations including GI bleeding and severe ulcerations were the first to appear in 9 of them, while anemia in the remaining 4. Conclusion: This is the largest study to date describing patients with WFS2. This study's evidence shows the prominent presence of GI involvement, and the severe findings on endoscopy, including duodenal, gastric, and esophageal ulcerations and strictures. Unlike in the Jordanian report, some of the patients in our report also have DI.

Esophageal IgE, IgG4, and mucosal eosinophilia in individuals with dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an inflammatory disease of the esophagus, producing failure to thrive in infants and dysphagia with food impaction in older children and adults. Although most people with EoE manifest atopic/allergic disease, the specific allergens to which immunoglobulin E (IgE) is directed, if any, have not yet been characterized. METHODS: Mucosal brush biopsy (MBB) and solid tissue biopsy (STB) specimens were prospectively obtained from 25 individuals with dysphagia and suspicion of EoE. Specific IgE (sIgE) against 112 epitopes from airborne and food proteins, antigens known to cause a polyclonal IgE response and IgG4 to food allergens, were measured. RESULTS: There was no difference in total IgE harvested between the 2 biopsy methods (p > 0.05) or between the EoE-positive (N = 12) and EoE-negative (N = 13) groups (p > 0.05). None of the samples in either group contained measurable serum IgE to any of the airborne or food proteins tested, but low levels of IgE specific to Candida and Staphylococcus enterotoxins were detected. Low levels of IgG4 specific to wheat, soy, peanut, and egg were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both MBB and STB are able to harvest measureable levels of IgE and IgG4 from the esophageal mucosa. Low levels of serum-specific IgE suggest that other inflammatory mechanisms, besides type I, IgE-mediated, allergen-specific hypersensitivity, may act as the primary catalyst for mucosal eosinophilia. Clarifying the role of both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated inflammatory mechanisms will help identify more targeted diagnostic and treatment strategies for individuals who present with dysphagia and esophageal eosinophilia.

BRAVO esophageal pH monitoring: more cost-effective than empiric medical therapy for suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

INTRODUCTION: Early referral for catheter-based esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than empiric proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We hypothesize that BRAVO wireless pH monitoring will also demonstrate substantial cost-savings compared to empiric PPI therapy, given its superior sensitivity and comfort. METHODS: We reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent wireless pH monitoring for suspected GERD at our institution. A cost model and a cost equivalence calculation were generated. Cost-saving analyses were performed for both esophageal and extraesophageal symptoms. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were available for analysis. Median PPI use prior to referral was 215 weeks (range 0-520). Forty-three patients (49 %) had BRAVO results diagnosing GERD; 98 % of these had esophageal symptoms. Patients with negative BRAVO studies had a median of 113 (0-520) weeks of unnecessary PPI therapy. Cost-savings ranged from $1048 to $15,853 per patient, depending on sensitivity (75-95 %), PPI dosage, and brand. Maximum cost-savings occurred in patients with extraesophageal symptoms ($2948-$31,389 per patient). The PPI cost equivalence of BRAVO placement was 36 and 6 weeks for low- and high-dose therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BRAVO wireless pH testing is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric medical management for GERD and should be incorporated early in the treatment algorithm.

More art than science: impedance analysis prone to interpretation error.

BACKGROUND: Impedance monitoring for reflux evaluation does not have standardized scoring, which can confound interpretation between observers. We investigated the variability of impedance testing interpretation between physicians and computer software. METHODS: Raw impedance data from 38 patients that underwent impedance monitoring at a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2013 were collected. Two physicians and computer software each analyzed the same impedance dataset for reflux activity and symptom-reflux correlation. RESULTS: Normalized reflux activity interpretations did not differ between physicians and the computer for acid or non-acid reflux. However, for weakly acidic reflux, there was significant difference between physicians (p < 0.01) and between physician and computer (p < 0.01). In analyzing all reflux, significant variability existed between physicians (p < 0.01) but not between physician and computer. Variability in interpretation altered diagnosis in 24 % of patients when comparing between physicians, 18 % of patients when comparing both physicians to the computer, and an additional 24 % of cases when comparing a single physician to the computer. Symptom-reflux correlation differed in 7 % of physician-physician comparisons versus 8 % of computer-physician comparisons. CONCLUSION: Impedance testing analysis is subject to marked variability between physicians and computer software, making impedance prone to interpretation error that can lead to differences in diagnosis and management.

Severe persistent unremitting dermatitis, chronic diarrhea and hypoalbuminemia in a child; Hartnup disease in setting of celiac disease.

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease (CD) is a complex autoimmune disorder that can lead to an inflammatory small intestinal villous atrophy and malabsorption. Hartnup disease is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by increased urinary excretion of neutral amino acids. Co-occurrence of Hartnup disease and CD is extremely rare with only a single case reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 3-year girl with chronic diarrhea, Hypoalbuminemia and exfoliative erythema. She was diagnosed with celiac disease, which did not improve on gluten free diet. Hartnup disease was suspected and was confirmed by neutral aminoaciduria. Niacin was started and followed by dramatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Presence of Celiac and Hartnup disease in single individual is very rare. Complete nutritional assessment of refractory celiac patient can reveal underlying nutritional deficiency.

Comparison of light and electron microscopy in measurement of esophageal intercellular space in children.

OBJECTIVES: A good objective marker of esophageal mucosal damage from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is lacking in children. Increased esophageal epithelial intercellular (EEIC) space measured using electron microscopy (EM) has been proposed as a surrogate of esophageal mucosal damage in adults with GERD. The aim of the present study was to compare EEIC space measured using EM and light microscopy (LM) in children with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) with asymptomatic controls. METHODS: Distal esophageal mucosal biopsy was used to measure EEIC space using EM in 35 NERD subjects and 8 controls. In a subset of these patients we used phase contrast LM to measure EEIC space area (26 NERD subjects and 8 controls). RESULTS: The median (range) EEIC space measured using EM in the NERD group was 1.15 (0.74-1.64) µm compared with 0.93 (0.67-1.11) µm in the control group (P = 0.002). The median (range) EEIC space measured using LM was 14.4% (9.6%-26.3%) in the NERD group and 9.6% (8.5%-17.2%) in controls (P = 0.003). Using a cutoff value of 1.02 µm for normal EEIC space measured by EM, we obtained 73% sensitivity and 75% specificity to distinguish the NERD group from the control group, and using a cutoff value of 11.1% for EEIC space measured by LM, we obtained 96% sensitivity and 75% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: EEIC space is increased in children with NERD compared with that in controls, suggesting that changes in EEIC space can be a useful marker of esophageal mucosal injury in children with NERD. Our results suggest that the accuracy of EM and LM to evaluate EEIC space changes in NERD is comparable, and LM may be a more cost-effective option.

Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

INTRODUCTION: The most cost-effective diagnostic algorithm for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains controversial. We hypothesized that prompt referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric courses of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). DISCUSSION: A cost model was created based on a cohort of 100 patients with possible GERD who underwent pH monitoring. The additional costs incurred from pH monitoring were compared to the potential savings from avoiding unnecessary PPI usage in patients with a negative pH study. The costs of PPI therapy reach equivalence with pH monitoring after 6.4 to 23.7 weeks, depending on the PPI regimen. A total of 21,411 weeks of PPIs were prescribed beyond the recommended 8-week trial, of which 32 % were for patients who had a negative 24-h pH monitoring study. If the sensitivity of pH monitoring was 96 %, early referral for pH monitoring would have saved between $1,197 and $6,303 per patient over 10 years. This strategy remains cost-effective as long as the sensitivity of pH monitoring is above 35 %. Prompt referral for pH monitoring after a brief empiric PPI trial is a more cost-effective strategy than prolonged empiric PPI trials for patients with both esophageal and extraesophageal GERD symptoms.

One-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350: an effective regimen for colonoscopy in children.

BACKGROUND: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 is commonly used and has been proven safe and effective for the treatment of chronic constipation and as a 4-day bowel preparation in children. A 1-day PEG 3350 bowel preparation regimen has been recently developed for adults; however, data regarding its use in children are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a 1-day PEG 3350 regimen for bowel preparation in children before colonoscopy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: This study involved all children prescribed a 1-day PEG 3350 bowel preparation regimen before colonoscopy at our center in 2008. INTERVENTION: We reviewed medical records of patients (< or = 18 years of age) who underwent colonoscopy during 2008 and received the 1-day bowel preparation regimen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Adequate preparation for colonoscopy, success of colonoscopy, and factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 272 patients. The median age of the children receiving the 1-day PEG 3350 preparation regimen was 13.7 years (range 1.08-17.92 years). Fifty-two percent were male; 48% were female. The most common indications for colonoscopy included abdominal pain (65%), bloody stools (29%), diarrhea (21%), and weight loss (18%). The 1-day bowel preparation regimen was effective in 253 patients (93%). The indication for colonoscopy, the age of the child, or a history of constipation did not significantly alter the success rate of colonoscopy. LIMITATIONS: A retrospective study at one tertiary-care center. CONCLUSION: The 1-day PEG 3350 bowel preparation regimen is safe and effective and should be considered for use as preparation for colonoscopy in children.