More inclusive bipolar mixed depression definition by permitting overlapping and non-overlapping mood elevation symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and limitations of a mixed bipolar depression definition made more inclusive than that of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) by counting not only 'non-overlapping' mood elevation symptoms (NOMES) as in DSM-5, but also 'overlapping' mood elevation symptoms (OMES, psychomotor agitation, distractibility, and irritability). METHODS: Among bipolar disorder (BD) out-patients assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation, we assessed prevalence, demographics, and clinical correlates of mixed vs. pure depression, using more inclusive (≥3 NOMES/OMES) and less inclusive DSM-5 (≥3 NOMES) definitions. RESULTS: Among 153 depressed BD, counting not only NOMES but also OMES yielded a three-fold higher mixed depression rate (22.9% vs. 7.2%) and important statistically significant clinical correlates for mixed compared to pure depression (more lifetime anxiety disorder comorbidity, more current irritability, and less current antidepressant use), which were not significant using the DSM-5 threshold. CONCLUSION: To conclude, further studies with larger numbers of patients with DSM-5 bipolar mixed depression assessing strengths and limitations of more inclusive mixed depression definitions are warranted, including efforts to ascertain whether or not OMES should count toward mixed depression.

More inclusive bipolar mixed depression definitions by requiring fewer non-overlapping mood elevation symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Assess strengths and limitations of mixed bipolar depression definitions made more inclusive than that of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) by requiring fewer than three 'non-overlapping' mood elevation symptoms (NOMES). METHOD: Among bipolar disorder (BD) out-patients assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation, we assessed prevalence, demographics, and clinical correlates of mixed vs. pure depression, using less inclusive (≥3 NOMES, DSM-5), more inclusive (≥2 NOMES), and most inclusive (≥1 NOMES) definitions. RESULTS: Among 153 depressed BD, compared to less inclusive DSM-5 threshold, our more and most inclusive thresholds, yielded approximately two- and five-fold higher mixed depression rates (7.2%, 15.0%, and 34.6% respectively), and important statistically significant clinical correlates for mixed compared to pure depression (e.g. more lifetime anxiety disorder comorbidity, more current irritability), which were not significant using the DSM-5 threshold. CONCLUSION: Further studies assessing strengths and limitations of more inclusive mixed depression definitions are warranted, including assessing the extent to which enhanced statistical power vs. other factors contributes to more vs. less inclusive mixed bipolar depression thresholds having more statistically significant clinical correlates, and whether 'overlapping' mood elevation symptoms should be counted.

Hostility in schizophrenia: An integrated analysis of the combined Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) and the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) studies.

Phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study enrolled a sample of 1493 chronic schizophrenia patients. The European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) enrolled 498 patients. We have combined these two samples to study the effects of hostility on study discontinuation as well as to examine correlates and predictors of hostility. Individual data from 1154 patients with complete data were used for analyses. Survival analysis demonstrated that higher hostility was associated with earlier all-cause treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, regression analysis indicated that increased hostility was associated with more severe positive symptoms, lower adherence to pharmacological treatment, younger age, impaired insight, and more drug or alcohol consumption. The clinical implications of the results point to the importance of establishing therapeutic alliance while managing patient's symptoms of hostility with antipsychotics such as olanzapine combined with psychosocial interventions to improve insight and reduce substance use.

Brexpiprazole: a new dopamine D2receptor partial agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.

Brexpiprazole is a dopamine D2receptor partial agonist. Compared with aripiprazole, it is more potent at 5-HT1A receptors and displays less intrinsic activity at D2receptors. Brexpiprazole also has potent antagonistic activity at 5-HT2A as well as alpha-adrenergic receptors. In addition to results from phase II trials, data are available from two pivotal phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of brexpiprazole for the acute treatment of schizophrenia and two pivotal phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive brexpiprazole for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in patients with inadequate response to antidepressant medication treatment. Overall tolerability is promising, with rates of discontinuation due to adverse events lower or slightly higher than that observed for placebo. Although overall akathisia was more commonly observed with brexpiprazole than with placebo, the absolute risk increase attributable to brexpiprazole appears small. Short-term weight gain appears modest; however, outliers with an increase of ≥ 7% of body weight were evident in open-label long-term safety studies.

Brexpiprazole for schizophrenia and as adjunct for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved antipsychotic - what is the number needed to treat, number needed to harm and likelihood to be helped or harmed?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the efficacy, tolerability and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia and as adjunct for major depressive disorder (MDD). DATA SOURCES: The pivotal registration trials were accessed by querying http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ and http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, for the search terms 'brexpiprazole' OR 'OPC-34712', and by also querying the EMBASE (Elsevier) commercial database for clinical poster abstracts, and by asking the manufacturer for copies of posters presented at congresses. Product labelling provided additional information. STUDY SELECTION: All available clinical reports of studies were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Descriptions of the principal results and calculation of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) for relevant dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the available study reports and other sources of information. DATA SYNTHESIS: Brexpiprazole is a new dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist that received approval for the treatment of schizophrenia and for adjunctive use for the treatment of MDD based on a clinical trial development programme that included two pivotal Phase III trials of brexpiprazole monotherapy in acute schizophrenia, and two pivotal Phase III trials of adjunctive brexpiprazole in acute MDD in patients who demonstrated inadequate response to standard antidepressant therapy. In addition, results from a 52-week relapse prevention/maintenance randomised placebo-controlled withdrawal study in patients with schizophrenia are available. In these trials, brexpiprazole was administered once daily and titrated to target doses. The recommended dose for the treatment of schizophrenia is 2-4 mg/day and that for MDD, 2 mg/day. Pooling together all the available data for the recommended target dose of brexpiprazole for acute schizophrenia from the above studies, the percentage of responders is 45.5% vs. 31.0% for placebo, yielding a NNT of 7 (95% CI 5-12). In the relapse prevention/maintenance trial, significantly fewer patients relapsed in the brexpiprazole group compared with placebo (13.5% vs. 38.5%), resulting in a NNT of 4 (95% CI 3-8). When the results for brexpiprazole 1, 2 and 3 mg from the two Phase III MDD trials are pooled together, 23.2% of the patients receiving brexpiprazole were responders, vs. 14.5% for placebo, yielding a NNT of 12 (95% CI 8-26). Brexpiprazole was well tolerated - for schizophrenia, discontinuation rates because of an adverse event (AE) were overall lower for patients receiving brexpiprazole vs. placebo, and for MDD a total of 3% of brexpiprazole-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients discontinued because of AEs, resulting in a NNH of 53 (95% CI 30-235). Although the most commonly encountered AE noted in product labelling was akathisia (5.5% in the acute schizophrenia trials and 8.6% in the MDD trials), differences from placebo were small, generating a non-significant NNH of 112 for patients with schizophrenia and a modest NNH of 15 (95% CI 11-23) for patients with MDD. Short-term weight gain appears modest; however, more outliers with an increase of ≥ 7% of body weight were evident in open-label 52-week safety studies. Effects on glucose and lipids were small. Minimal effects on prolactin were observed, and no clinically relevant effects on the ECG QT interval were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials of brexpiprazole support its efficacy at the recommended target dose of 2-4 mg/day for the treatment of schizophrenia, and at the recommended target dose of 2 mg/day as adjunct to antidepressant medication for the treatment of MDD. Head-to-head comparisons with other available agents among patients with schizophrenia and MDD in the 'real world' are needed.