Brief Report: Long-Term Follow-Up of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab After Locally Ablative Therapy for Oligometastatic NSCLC.

Introduction: Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC benefit from locally ablative therapies (LAT); the role of adjuvant systemic therapies, however, remains less clear. In a single-arm, phase II clinical trial, we found that patients with oligometastatic NSCLC treated with a year of pembrolizumab after LAT had superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with a historical control cohort. Herein, we present long-term follow-up on PFS and overall survival (OS). Methods: From February 1, 2015, to September 30, 2017, 45 patients with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic (≤4 metastatic sites) NSCLC treated with LAT to all sites received adjuvant pembrolizumab every 21 days for up to 16 cycles. The primary efficacy end point was PFS from the start of pembrolizumab. Secondary end points included OS and safety. Median duration of follow-up was 66 months, and data cutoff was December 1, 2022. Results: A total of 45 patients were enrolled and treated with pembrolizumab after LAT (median age, 64 y [range, 46-82]; 21 women [47%]; 31 with a solitary oligometastatic site [69%]). At the data cutoff, 32 patients had progressive disease, 19 patients had died, and 13 patients had no evidence of relapse. Median PFS was 19.7 months (95% confidence interval: 7.6-31.7 mo); median OS was not reached (95% confidence interval: 37.7 mo-not reached). OS at 5 years was 60.0% (SE, 7.4%). Metachronous oligometastatic disease was associated with improved OS and PFS through Cox proportional hazard models. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab after LAT for oligometastatic NSCLC results in promising PFS and OS with a tolerable safety profile.

Plunging Into the PACIFIC: Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Definitive Chemoradiation and Durvalumab Consolidation.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) substantially improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the PACIFIC trial becoming the standard of care in locally-advanced, unresectable NSCLC. KRAS mutation may influence response to ICI. METHODS: In this single-institution, retrospective analysis, we compared treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable KRAS mutated (KRAS-mt) and wild-type (KRAS-wt) NSCLC treated with CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted comparing median progression free survival and median overall survival from completion of radiotherapy in all KRAS-mt patients and KRAS-G12C-mutated patients. Outcomes were also compared with and without ICI consolidation. RESULTS: Of 156 patients, 42 (26.9%) were KRAS-mt and 114 (73.1%) were KRAS-wt. Baseline characteristics differed only in histology; KRAS-mt NSCLC more likely to be adenocarcinoma. KRAS-mt patients had worse PFS (median 6.3 vs. 10.7 months, P = .041) but similar OS (median 23.1 vs. 27.3 months, P = .237). KRAS-mt patients were more likely to not receive ICI due to rapid disease progression post-CRT (23.8% vs. 4.4%, P = .007). Among patients who received ICI (n = 114), KRAS-mt was not associated with inferior PFS (8.1 vs. 11.9 months, P = .355) or OS (30.5 vs. 31.7 months, P = .692). KRAS-G12C patients (n = 22) had similar PFS and OS to other KRAS-mt. CONCLUSION: In one of the largest post-CRT KRAS-mt cohort published, KRAS-mt was associated with inferior PFS, largely due to rapid progression prior to ICI consolidation, but did not affect OS. Among those who received ICI consolidation, outcomes were comparable regardless of KRAS-mt status.

Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Pembrolizumab After Proton Reirradiation for Thoracic Recurrences of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer a chance of cure while minimizing toxicity for patients with isolated intrathoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, distant failure remains common, necessitating strategies to integrate more effective systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial (NCT03087760) of consolidation pembrolizumab after PBT reRT for locoregional recurrences of NSCLC. Four to 12 weeks after completion of 60 to 70 Gy PBT reRT, patients without progressive disease received pembrolizumab for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), measured from the start of reRT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 22 patients received PBT reRT. Median interval from prior radiation end to reRT start was 20 months. Most recurrences (91%) were centrally located. Most patients received concurrent chemotherapy (95%) and pencil beam scanning PBT (77%), and 36% had received prior durvalumab. Fifteen patients (68%) initiated consolidation pembrolizumab on trial and received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-17). Pembrolizumab was discontinued most commonly due to toxicity (n = 5; 2 were pembrolizumab-related), disease progression (n = 4), and completion of 1 year (n = 3). Median follow-up was 38.7 months. Median PFS and OS were 8.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-23.7) and 22.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-not reached), respectively. There was only one isolated in-field failure after reRT. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 10 patients (45%); 2 were pembrolizumab-related. There were 2 grade 5 toxicities, an aorto-esophageal fistula at 6.9 months and hemoptysis at 46.8 months, both probably from reRT. The trial closed early due to widespread adoption of immunotherapy off-protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-ever prospective trial combining PBT reRT with consolidation immunotherapy, PFS was acceptable and OS favorable. Late grade 5 toxicity occurred in 2 of 22 patients. This approach may be considered in selected patients with isolated thoracic recurrences of NSCLC.

Patterns of Failure in Metastatic NSCLC Treated With First Line Pembrolizumab and Use of Local Therapy in Patients With Oligoprogression.

INTRODUCTION: The patterns of failure (POF) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy are not well established. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mNSCLC that received first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at a single academic center from 2015 to 2021. We defined POF with 2 classifications: 1) local, regional, or distant failure, or 2) failure in existing lesions, new lesions, or a combination. Oligoprogression was defined as disease progression (PD) in ≤3 sites of failure. Overall survival (OS) was measured via Kaplan-Meier and modelled with Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 298 patients identified, 198 had PD. Using POF classification 1, most failures were distant (43.9%) or a combination of locoregional and distant (34.4%). For POF classification 2, failures occurred in a combination of new and existing lesions (45.0%), existing lesions alone (33.3%), or in new lesions only (21.7%). Oligoprogression occurred in 39.9% (n = 79) cases. Median OS was higher in the following: PD in existing lesions vs. new or new + existing lesions (28.7 vs. 20.2 vs. 13.9 months, P < .001) and oligoprogression vs. polyprogression (35.1 vs. 12.2 months, P < .001). In oligoprogression, median OS was better for those who received radiation to all sites of PD (62.2 months) than for those who changed systemic therapy (22.9 months, P = .007). On multivariable analysis, radiation for oligoprogression (HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62, P < .001) was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: In mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab, oligoprogression is relatively common. Randomized data are needed to define the benefits of radiation in oligoprogressive mNSCLC.

Synchronous Primary Lung Cancers Containing Discrete Driver Mutations in a Never-Smoker: Case Report.

Although most lung cancer patients present with one primary cancer, some present with multiple lung cancers of different clonal origin. Timely recognition of synchronous multifocal primary lung cancer (MPLC) enables distinct treatment regimens that reflect the unique genotypic makeup and location of each cancer. However, recognition of synchronous MPLCs is challenging given the prevalence of multifocal disease. Here, we report a case of a patient diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase, termed ALK, positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma whose follow-up computerized tomography (CT) imaging identified one lesion, present since the patient's initial presentation, with a distinctly different response to treatment than other lesions. Biopsy results showed a distinct MPLC, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive adenocarcinoma with no evidence of an ALK mutation. The EGFR lesion was treated with curative intent via surgical resection while the ALK disease was managed with palliative intent via targeted therapy. To our knowledge, there have been no other reports of two synchronous MPLCs of an adenocarcinoma subtype with completely distinct EGFR and ALK driver mutations. This case highlights the importance of serial follow-up imaging, combined with biopsy of lesions with atypical treatment responses, as a method for identifying synchronous MPLCs and adjusting treatment to optimize patient outcomes.

Brief Report: Second-line treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with first-line immunotherapy regimens.

CLINICAL PRACTICE POINTS: In the United States of America, nearly all patients with advanced NSCLC, absent oncogenic drivers, receive some form of immunotherapy (IO) as part of initial treatment. Current national guidelines currently recommend against IO re-challenge if there is disease progression on IO in the first line, but re-treatment with IO is attractive given its favorable toxicity profile and descriptions of durable clinical benefit in a subset of patients treated beyond disease progression on initial IO (Gandara, J Thorac Oncol, 2018). Data in the non-clinical trial setting on the efficacy of IO in sequential lines of treatment after initial IO are lacking. In our large cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, we find that outcomes after second-line treatment did not differ statistically by type of treatment used in the second line. While current prospective clinical trials are investigating several aspects of the utility of continuing immunotherapy and adding novel agents, our study offers data outside of a clinical trial. In addition, with the increased prevalence of adjuvant immunotherapy we urgently need to wrestle with whether to continue immunotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting if a patient experiences disease progression on adjuvant immunotherapy. While this analysis does not directly investigate that question, it does provide hypothesis-generating evidence for further evaluations.

A Phase II Open-Label Trial of Binimetinib and Hydroxychloroquine in Patients With Advanced KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In RAS-mutant tumors, combined MEK and autophagy inhibition using chloroquine demonstrated synthetic lethality in preclinical studies. This phase II trial evaluated the safety and activity of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included KRAS-mutant NSCLC, progression after first-line therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate end-organ function. Binimetinib 45 mg was administered orally (p.o.) bid with HCQ 400 mg p.o. bid. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). A Simon's 2-stage phase II clinical trial design was used, with an α error of 5% and a power ß of 80%, anticipating an ORR of 30% to proceed to the 2-stage expansion. RESULTS: Between April 2021 and January 2022, 9 patients were enrolled to stage I: median age 64 years, 44.4% females, 78% smokers. The best response was stable disease in one patient (11.1%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months. Overall, 5 patients (55.6%) developed a grade 3 adverse event (AE). The most common grade 3 toxicity was rash (33%). Pre-specified criteria for stopping the trial early due to lack of efficacy were met. CONCLUSION: The combination of B + HCQ in second- or later-line treatment of patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC did not show significant antitumor activity. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04735068).

Utilization and Factors Precluding Receipt of Checkpoint Inhibitor Consolidation for Stage III NSCLC in a Large US Academic Health System.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the proportion of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initiate consolidation durvalumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), as well as reasons for nonreceipt and prognostic implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT between October 2017 and December 2021 within a large US academic health system. Patients either received consolidation ICIs (ICI group) or did not (no-ICI group). Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the groups were assessed. Factors predictive of ICI nonreceipt were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 333 patients who completed cCRT, 229 (69%) initiated consolidation ICIs; 104 (31%) did not. Reasons for ICI nonreceipt included progressive disease post-cCRT (N = 31, 9%), comorbidity or intercurrent illness (N = 25, 8%), cCRT toxicity (N = 23, 7%; 19/23 pneumonitis), and EGFR/ALK alteration (N = 14, 4%). The no-ICI group had worse performance status and a higher rate of baseline pulmonary comorbidity. Larger planning target volume was associated with post-cCRT progressive disease, and higher lung radiation dose with cCRT toxicity. Median OS was 16 months in the no-ICI group and 34.4 months in the ICI group. In the no-ICI group, OS was superior among those with EGFR/ALK alterations (median 44.5 months) and worst among those with progressive disease (median 5.9 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 31% of patients who completed cCRT for stage III NSCLC did not receive consolidation ICIs. Survival amongst these patients is poor, especially for those with progressive disease post-cCRT.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Among Adults With Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Importance: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Pembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Results: This study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

A single-center retrospective cohort study of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare variant of malignant mesothelioma, representing 10-15% of malignant mesothelioma cases. The preferred therapeutic approach is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) accompanied by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); the role of systemic chemotherapy is not well established. While some limited retrospective studies report worse outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, our institution has favored the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for symptom relief and surgical optimization. The aim of our study was to assess the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to those receiving adjuvant or no perioperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of treatment-naïve, non-papillary DMPM patients seen at our institution between 1/1/2009 and 9/1/2019. We explored the effect of type of systemic therapy on clinical outcomes and estimated median overall survival (mOS) using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HR) calculated by Cox proportional hazard model were used to estimate effect of the exposures on overall survival. RESULTS: 47 patients were identified with DMPM (median age at diagnosis 61.2 years, 76.6% epithelioid histology, 74.5% white race, 55.3% known asbestos exposure). CRS was performed in 53.2% of patients (25/47); 76.0% of surgical patients received HIPEC (19/25). The majority received systemic chemotherapy (37/47, 78.7%); among patients receiving both CRS and chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was more common than adjuvant chemotherapy (12 neoadjuvant, 8 adjuvant). Overall mOS was 84.1 months. Among neoadjuvant patients, 10/12 underwent surgery, and 2 were lost to follow-up; the majority (9/10) had clinically stable or improved disease during the pre-operative period. There were numerical more issues with chemotherapy with the adjuvant patients (4/8: 2 switches in platinum agent, 2 patients stopped therapy) than with the neoadjuvant patients (2/10: 1 switch in platinum agent, 1 delay due to peri-procedural symptoms). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with worse mOS compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (mOS NR vs 95.1 mo, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18-4.5, p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: When used preferentially, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in DMPM patients was not associated with worse outcomes compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. It was well-tolerated and did not prevent surgical intervention.

Plasma Genotyping at the Time of Diagnostic Tissue Biopsy Decreases Time-to-Treatment in Patients With Advanced NSCLC-Results From a Prospective Pilot Study.

Introduction: The availability of targeted therapies has transformed the management of advanced NSCLC; however, most patients do not undergo guideline-recommended tumor genotyping. The impact of plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed simultaneously with diagnostic biopsy in suspected advanced NSCLC has largely been unexplored. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with suspected advanced lung cancer on the basis of cross-sectional imaging results. Blood from the time of biopsy was sequenced using a commercially available 74-gene panel. The primary outcome measure was time to first-line systemic treatment compared with a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC with reflex tissue NGS. Results: We analyzed the NGS results from 110 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC: cohorts 1 and 2 included 55 patients each and were well balanced regarding baseline demographics. In cohort 1, plasma NGS identified therapeutically informative driver mutations in 32 patients (58%) (13 KRAS [five KRAS G12C], 13 EGFR, two ERRB2, two MET, one BRAF, one RET). The NGS results were available before the first oncology visit in 85% of cohort 1 versus 9% in cohort 2 (p < 0.0001), with more cohort 1 patients receiving a guideline-concordant treatment recommendation at this visit (74% versus 46%, p = 0.005). Time-to-treatment was significantly shorter in cohort 1 compared with cohort 2 (12 versus 20 d, p = 0.003), with a shorter time-to-treatment in patients with specific driver mutations (10 versus 19 d, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Plasma-based NGS performed at the time of diagnostic biopsy in patients with suspected advanced NSCLC is associated with decreased time-to-treatment compared with usual care.

Phase II Trial of Combination Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Platinum and Pemetrexed.

BACKGROUND: Better therapies are needed to improve survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the synergy of combination nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer and their individual activity in advanced NSCLC, we sought to determine whether the same combination would confer a therapeutic benefit in the second-line therapy of recurrent or metastatic non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-arm phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was performed from June 2015 to April 2020 at an academic referral cancer center. Patients with advanced NSQ-NSCLC whose disease progressed on first-line pemetrexed plus platinum +/- immunotherapy were enrolled. Patients received intravenous nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (15 men [41%] and 22 women [59%]; median age, 66 years [range, 41-81 years]) were accrued. ORR was 13.5% (95% CI, 2.5-24.5%). DCR was 59.5% (95% CI, 43.5-75.5%). Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.8 months). Median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.2 months). 1-year OS was 24% (95% CI, 10-38%). Safety and tolerability were similar to other second-line chemotherapies, although there was an 11% incidence of grade 2-3 pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Combination nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine after platinum and pemetrexed for NSQ-NSCLC was not associated with greater efficacy than would be expected for single-agent chemotherapy in this setting. The higher-than-expected risk of pneumonitis was also concerning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02303977 MICRO-ABSTRACT: In this phase II trial, 37 patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were treated with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine in second-line. ORR = 13.5% (95% CI, 2.5%-24.5%). Median PFS = 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.8 months). Median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.2 months). Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine was not associated with greater efficacy than would be expected for single-agent chemotherapy in this setting.

Platinum Re-Exposure as a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treatment Strategy in the Age of Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy has prolonged the time that NSCLC patients are off platinum-based (PB) chemotherapy. However, the significance of the platinum-free-interval (PFI) is unclear. We evaluated whether an optimal PFI exists in NSCLC for PB re-exposure in contemporary treatment settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with 1st-line PB chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy. Using multivariable Cox models stratified by treatment strategies, we evaluated whether salvage PB vs. nonPB chemotherapy resulted in superior outcomes and whether this was modulated by the PFI. RESULTS: A total of 751 patients treated with salvage chemotherapy after PB chemoimmunotherapy were identified in 2 treatment strategy cohorts: 3rd-line after sequential chemotherapy and immunotherapy (Sequential Chemo IO, n = 604); 2ndline after chemoimmunotherapy (Concurrent ChemoIO, n = 147). An optimal PFI of 5 and 6 months was identified in the Sequential Chemo IO and Concurrent ChemoIO cohorts, respectively, but there was no overall survival or progression free survival advantage for PB vs. nonPB chemotherapy in long or short PFI groups. CONCLUSION: An optimal PFI was identified in this contemporary NSCLC cohort treated with two common immunotherapy-containing treatment approaches, but PFI threshold did not predict benefit from platinum re-exposure as it has in other malignancies.

Landscape and Clonal Dominance of Co-occurring Genomic Alterations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping.

MET exon 14 skipping alterations (METex14) comprise a diverse set of actionable oncogene drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have established the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this patient population. The landscape of co-occurring genetic alterations in METex14 NSCLC and their potential impact to therapeutic sensitivities has not yet been fully described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: METex14 NSCLC cases were collected from three cohorts: the VISION trial, and data sets from Guardant360 and GenePlus. Clinicopathologic characteristics and METex14 mutation sites were analyzed and compared across data sets. Co-occurring genetic alterations and the clonality relationships to METex14 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 40,824 NSCLCs, 692 METex14 cases (1.7%) were identified, including 332 in Guardant360, 188 in VISION, and 172 in GenePlus. The demographics and mutation type and/or sites were similar in the Asian versus Western cohorts. MET amplification, which were found to be associated with sensitivity to MET kinase inhibitors, co-occurs in 7.6%-13.8% of cases, whereas kinase domain secondary mutation of MET co-occurs in 5%-6%. When co-occurring with METex14, EGFR mutations were often identified as the dominant clone (78%, 7 of 9), whereas when co-occurring, METex14 (39%, 7 of 18) and KRAS (44%, 8 of 18) had similar rates of clonal dominance. PIK3CA and PTEN mutations were almost always subclones (89%, 16 of 18) to METex14. Moreover, RET-CCDC6 fusion and EGFR mutation were detected following crizotinib treatment in two patients, suggesting novel mechanisms of resistance. CONCLUSION: METex14 mutations frequently co-occur with other potential driver oncogenes with differing patterns of clonal dominance observed among the drivers. This cellular context can provide insights into whether METex14 is acting as a primary oncogenic driver or resistance mechanism and help guide treatment choices.

Serial Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA by Next-Generation Gene Sequencing as a Biomarker of Response and Survival in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Receiving Pembrolizumab-Based Therapy.

Although the majority of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) lacking a detectable targetable mutation will receive pembrolizumab-based therapy in the frontline setting, predicting which patients will experience a durable clinical benefit (DCB) remains challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mNSCLC receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy underwent a 74-gene next-generation sequencing panel on blood samples obtained at baseline and at 9 weeks. The change in circulating tumor DNA levels on-therapy (molecular response) was quantified using a ratio calculation with response defined by a > 50% decrease in mean variant allele fraction. Patient response was assessed using RECIST 1.1; DCB was defined as complete or partial response or stable disease that lasted > 6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were recorded. RESULTS: Among 67 patients, 51 (76.1%) had > 1 variant detected at a variant allele fraction > 0.3% and thus were eligible for calculation of molecular response from paired baseline and 9-week samples. Molecular response values were significantly lower in patients with an objective radiologic response (log mean 1.25% v 27.7%, P < .001). Patients achieving a DCB had significantly lower molecular response values compared to patients with no durable benefit (log mean 3.5% v 49.4%, P < .001). Molecular responders had significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.64) compared with molecular nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Molecular response assessment using circulating tumor DNA may serve as a noninvasive, on-therapy predictor of response to pembrolizumab-based therapy in addition to standard of care imaging in mNSCLC. This strategy requires validation in independent prospective studies.

Case Report of Acute Splenic Sequestration Crisis in an Adult Patient with Hb S Disease and Suspected Hereditary Persistence of Fetal Hemoglobin.

Acute splenic sequestration crisis (ASSC) is a life-threatening complication of sickle cell disease characterized by acute splenic enlargement and a rapid drop in hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Although ASSC is predominantly a disease of childhood, rare cases of ASSC have been reported in adults, frequently in association with heterozygous sickle cell disease. We describe a case of ASSC in a 29-year-old woman with homozygous Hb S (HBB: c.20A>T) disease and suspected hereditary persistence of fetal Hb (HPFH), which was accompanied by marked leukocytosis.

Outcomes in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases Treated With Pembrolizumab-based Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and untreated brain metastases (BM) have been excluded from most trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Real-world evidence on efficacy and survival outcomes of ICIs in patients with BM is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without BM using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. We also characterized systemic and intracranial objective response rate (ORR) and treatment details, including timing of cranial irradiation. RESULTS: Between Augutst 2013 and December 2018, 570 patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy were analyzed. Of 126 (22.1%) patients with BM, 96 (76.2%) had treated BM (local therapy prior to pembrolizumab), and 30 (23.8%) had untreated BM. Of patients with untreated BM, 17 (56.7%) underwent radiation within 30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. In the remaining 13 (43.3%) treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy alone, intracranial ORR was 36.4%. Patients with and without BM did not have significantly different systemic ORR (27.8% vs. 29.7%; P = .671), PFS (mPFS 9.2 vs. 7.7 months; P = .609), or OS (mOS 18.0 vs. 18.7 months; P = .966). Factors associated with improved survival on Cox analysis included female gender, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and first-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BM did not have inferior survival to patients without BM after treatment with pembrolizumab-based therapy. In the current era, BM may not automatically confer inferior survival, and should not exclude patients from receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy.

Management of Lung Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a devastating impact around the world. With high rates of transmission and no curative therapies or vaccine yet available, the current cornerstone of management focuses on prevention by social distancing. This includes decreased health care contact for patients. Patients with lung cancer are a particularly vulnerable population, where the risk of mortality from cancer must now be balanced by the potential risk of a life-threatening infection. In these unprecedented times, a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach is required to streamline but not compromise care. We have developed guidelines at our academic cancer center to standardize management of patients with lung cancer across our health care system and provide guidance to the larger oncology community. We recommend that general principles of lung cancer treatment continue to be followed in most cases where delays could result in rapid cancer progression. We recognize that our recommendations may change over time based on clinical resources and the evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. In principle, however, treatment paradigms must continue to be individualized, with careful consideration of risks and benefits of continuing or altering lung cancer-directed therapy.

Baseline Plasma Tumor Mutation Burden Predicts Response to Pembrolizumab-based Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The role of plasma-based tumor mutation burden (pTMB) in predicting response to pembrolizumab-based first-line standard-of-care therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has not been explored. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A 500-gene next-generation sequencing panel was used to assess pTMB. Sixty-six patients with newly diagnosed mNSCLC starting first-line pembrolizumab-based therapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, were enrolled (Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT03047616). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Associations were made for patient characteristics, 6-month durable clinical benefit (DCB), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 66 patients, 52 (78.8%) were pTMB-evaluable. Median pTMB was 16.8 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb; range, 1.9-52.5) and was significantly higher for patients achieving DCB compared with no durable benefit (21.3 mut/Mb vs. 12.4 mut/Mb, P = 0.003). For patients with pTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb, median PFS was 14.1 versus 4.7 months for patients with pTMB < 16 mut/Mb [HR, 0.30 (0.16-0.60); P < 0.001]. Median OS for patients with pTMB ≥ 16 was not reached versus 8.8 months for patients with pTMB < 16 mut/Mb [HR, 0.48 (0.22-1.03); P = 0.061]. Mutations in ERBB2 exon 20, STK11, KEAP1, or PTEN were more common in patients with no DCB. A combination of pTMB ≥ 16 and absence of negative predictor mutations was associated with PFS [HR, 0.24 (0.11-0.49); P < 0.001] and OS [HR, 0.31 (0.13-0.74); P = 0.009]. CONCLUSIONS: pTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb is associated with improved PFS after first-line standard-of-care pembrolizumab-based therapy in mNSCLC. STK11/KEAP1/PTEN and ERBB2 mutations may help identify pTMB-high patients unlikely to respond. These results should be validated in larger prospective studies.

Early Tumor and Nodal Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Predict for Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Treated with Concurrent Proton Therapy and Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: There are no established imaging biomarkers that predict response during chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. At our institution, proton therapy (PT) patients undergo repeat computed tomography (CT) simulations twice during radiation. We hypothesized that tumor regression measured on these scans would separate early and late responders and that early response would translate into better outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients underwent CT simulations before starting PT (CT0) and between weeks 1 to 3 (CT1) and weeks 4 to 7 (CT2) of PT. Primary tumor volume (TVR) and nodal volume (NVR) reduction were calculated at CT1 and CT2. Based on recursive partitioning analysis, early response at CT1 and CT2 was defined as ≥20% and ≥40%, respectively. Locoregional and overall progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival by response status were measured using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma underwent definitive PT to a median dose of 66.6 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. Median TVR and NVR at CT1 were 19% (0-79%) and 19% (0-75%), respectively. At CT2, they were 33% (2-98%) and 35% (0-89%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the median overall survival and PFS for the entire cohort was 24.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. Compared with patients with TVR and NVR <20% at T1 and <40% at T2, patients with TVR and NVR ≥20% at CT1 and ≥40% at CT2 had improved median locoregional PFS (27.15 vs 12.97 months for TVR ≥40% vs <40%, P < .01, and 25.67 vs 12.09 months for NVR ≥40% vs <40%, P < .01) and median PFS (22.7 vs 9.2 months, P < .01, and 20.3 vs 7.9 months, P < .01), confirmed on multivariate Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly improved outcomes in patients with early responses to therapy, as measured by TVR and NVR, were seen. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment intensification will improve outcomes in slow-responding patients.