Median Lingual Foramen, a new midmandibular cephalometric landmark.

PURPOSE: In asymmetrical mandibles, it is often challenging to identify the mandibular midline. The median lingual foramen (MLF) is located at the midline of the anterior mandible. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of identifying the MLF compared to conventional landmarks on cone beam computed tomography's (CBCT's) to mark the mandibular midline. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten symmetrical class II, 10 symmetrical class III, ten asymmetrical class II and 10 asymmetrical class III patients were included. On CBCTs, the cephalometric landmarks menton, pogonion, genial tubercle and MLF were identified twice by two observers. RESULTS: A high intra- and interobserver reproducibility was found for all landmarks, the highest being the MLF. The gain in accuracy is 0.998 mm, 0.824 mm and 0.361 mm compared to pogonion, genial tubercle and menton, respectively (P-value <.05). CONCLUSION: MLF is a reliable and reproducible landmark to indicate the midline of the mandible, particularly in Class II asymmetric mandibles.

Development and validation of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index.

Aesthetic appraisal is rarely included in the objective assessment of outcome studies of impacted maxillary canines treatment. The present study aimed to validate a new index for assessing the aesthetic appearance of maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues. The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at University Hospitals Leuven. Four oral-maxillofacial surgeons, two orthodontists, two prosthodontists, and two lay persons rated 11 maxillary canines and adjacent soft tissues according to the new index. Each of the examiners repeated the examination three times with a 2-week interval. Twelve relevant aesthetic variables were selected on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the canine crown and on the basis of the anatomic form, color, and surface characteristics of the adjacent soft tissues. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient and Fleiss' kappa statistics were performed to analyze the intrarater and interrater agreement. The index proofed to be a reliable assessment tool. Considering the cumulative assessment of the Maxillary Canine Aesthetic Index (MCAI), the mean ICC value for the interrater agreement of the 10 examiners was 0.71, representing a good agreement. Intrarater agreement ranged from 0.10 to 0.91. Interrater agreement (Fleiss' kappa statistics) calculated for each variable ranged from 0.08 to 0.98. The MCAI is a tool in rating aesthetic outcome of impacted canine treatment and adjacent soft tissues. The MCAI can be used to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical exposure or transalveolar transplantation of maxillary canines.