Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; : 102286, 2023 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37972692

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether reinforcing cerclage following ultrasound evidence of cerclage failure before 24 weeks is an effective method to delay gestational age at delivery, and to decrease the rate of preterm and peri-viable delivery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all patients who underwent any cervical cerclage procedure at a single tertiary care centre in Toronto, Canada between 1 December 2007 and 31 December 2017. RESULTS: Of 1482 cerclage procedures completed during the study period, 40 pregnant persons who underwent reinforcing cerclage were compared with 40 pregnant persons who were found to have cerclage failure before 24 weeks but were managed expectantly. After adjusting for the shortest cervical length measured prior to 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between the reinforcing cerclage and control group for gestational age at delivery, preterm, or peri-viable birth (P = 0.52, P = 0.54, P = 0.74, respectively). In an unadjusted model, there was a statistically significant increase in placental infection identified on postpartum placenta pathology in the reinforcing cerclage group compared with the expectant management group, 92.9% compared with 66.7% (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Reinforcing cerclage is unlikely to successfully delay the gestational age at delivery and reduce rates of preterm and pre-viable birth, especially if irreversible and progressive cervical change has begun. Future work should examine the role of preoperative amniocentesis to explore the impact of pre-existing intra-amniotic infection and reinforcing cerclage success.

2.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 25(3): 529-538, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637689

RESUMEN

Pregnant refugee patients are especially vulnerable to adverse perinatal outcomes. Detailed characterization of this heterogenous population will identify risk factors and thus guide contextualized initiatives for improved patient care. A retrospective cohort study of obstetrical refugee patients at a tertiary-care hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Of 196 pregnant refugees, 48% were fluent English speaking, 57% had poor social support, and 42% lived in a shelter. Eighty-seven percent started prenatal care after the first trimester, which was associated with delivery of a large-for-gestational-age infant (p = 0.043). Sixteen percent experienced family violence, which was associated with poor fetal aggregate outcomes (p = 0.03). There were significantly higher rates of pre-eclampsia and Cesarean sections in refugee versus non-refugee patients (p < 0.05). Pregnant refugees are at risk for psychosocial challenges and experience significantly worse obstetrical outcomes compared with non-refugees. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on access to early prenatal care, stable housing, and support for victims of family violence.


Asunto(s)
Atención Prenatal , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ontario/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Demografía
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 45(1): 21-26, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Create a process map for emergency department (ED) presentations of surgical ectopic pregnancy, and identify areas of management amenable to quality improvement. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgical management of ectopic pregnancy at a large, urban, academic tertiary care centre from 2015 to 2017 was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. There were 6 (8.2%) unstable A cases (recommended time to operating room [OR] 0-2 hours), 23 (31.5%) stable A cases, and 44 (60%) B cases (recommended time to OR 2-8 hours). The percent of patients who were in the OR within the recommended time window were 6 (100%) for unstable A cases, 13 (56%) stable A cases, and 29 (65.9%) stable B cases, respectively (P = 0.139). Notable time delays include the time from gynaecology referral to the time seen by gynaecology (29.7% of total wait time for stable A cases from ED to OR) and the time the OR was booked to the time the patient was brought to the OR (53.2% of total wait time for stable B cases). Of the patients seen by physician at the emergency department first, the time from triage to the OR was significantly shorter for patients that received bedside ultrasound only (0.67 ± 0.5 hours vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 hours [P = 0.007]). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to map the ED presentation of surgical ectopic pregnancy. The management of ectopic pregnancy would benefit from the development of surgical triage decision aids, a surgical care pathway, and increased use of screening bedside ultrasound.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo Ectópico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embarazo Ectópico/diagnóstico , Embarazo Ectópico/cirugía , Ultrasonografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Triaje
5.
Curr Oncol ; 29(3): 2132-2140, 2022 03 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35323372

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death among women with gynecologic malignancy. Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 1 (BRCA 1) and Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene 2 (BRCA 2) germline mutations confer an estimated 20 to 40 times increased risk of OC when compared to the general population. The majority of BRCA-associated OC is identified in the late stage, and no effective screening method has been proven to reduce mortality. Several pharmacologic and surgical options exist for risk-reduction of gynecologic malignancy in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers. This review summarizes up-to-date research on pharmacologic risk-reducing interventions, including the oral contraceptive pill, acetylsalicylic acid/nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (ASA/NSAID) therapy, and denosumab, and surgical risk-reducing interventions, including risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, and hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Ováricas , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Mutación , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética
6.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 119, 2022 Feb 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35148698

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The provision of care to pregnant persons and neonates must continue through pandemics. To maintain quality of care, while minimizing physical contact during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic, hospitals and international organizations issued recommendations on maternity and neonatal care delivery and restructuring of clinical and academic services. Early in the pandemic, recommendations relied on expert opinion, and offered a one-size-fits-all set of guidelines. Our aim was to examine these recommendations and provide the rationale and context to guide clinicians, administrators, educators, and researchers, on how to adapt maternity and neonatal services during the pandemic, regardless of jurisdiction. METHOD: Our initial database search used Medical subject headings and free-text search terms related to coronavirus infections, pregnancy and neonatology, and summarized relevant recommendations from international society guidelines. Subsequent targeted searches to December 30, 2020, included relevant publications in general medical and obstetric journals, and updated society recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 846 titles and abstracts, of which 105 English-language publications fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in our study. A multidisciplinary team representing clinicians from various disciplines, academics, administrators and training program directors critically appraised the literature to collate recommendations by multiple jurisdictions, including a quaternary care Canadian hospital, to provide context and rationale for viable options. INTERPRETATION: There are different schools of thought regarding effective practices in obstetric and neonatal services. Our critical review presents the rationale to effectively modify services, based on the phase of the pandemic, the prevalence of infection in the population, and resource availability.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/organización & administración , Atención Perinatal , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Centros Médicos Académicos , COVID-19/terapia , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pacientes Internos , Política Organizacional , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(4): 367.e1-367.e39, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as the standard of care for surgical staging in low-grade endometrial cancer, but its value in high-grade endometrial cancer remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the performance characteristics of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with endometrial cancer with high-grade histology (registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with identifying number CRD42020160280). DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase databases all through the OvidSP platform. The search was performed between January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing registered clinical trials. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included prospective cohort studies in which sentinel lymph node biopsy were evaluated in clinical stage I patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, mixed, undifferentiated or dedifferentiated, and high-grade not otherwise specified) with a cervical injection of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node detection and at least a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. If the data were not reported specifically for patients with high-grade histology, the authors were contacted for aggregate data. METHODS: We pooled the detection rates and measures of diagnostic accuracy using a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a logit and assessed the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. RESULTS: We identified 16 eligible studies of which the authors for 9 of the studies provided data on 429 patients with high-grade endometrial cancer specifically. The study-level median age was 66 years (range, 44-82.5 years) and the study-level median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m2 (range, 19.4-43.7 kg/m2). The pooled detection rates were 91% per patient (95% confidence interval, 85%-95%; I2=59%) and 64% bilaterally (95% confidence interval, 53%-73%; I2=69%). The overall node positivity rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 19%-34%; I2=44%). Of the 87 patients with positive node results, a sentinel lymph node biopsy correctly identified 80, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 92% per patient (95% confidence interval, 84%-96%; I2=0%), a false negative rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 4%-16%; I2=0%), and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% confidence interval, 95%-99%; I2=0%). CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately detect lymph node metastases in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer with a false negative rate comparable with that observed in low-grade endometrial cancer, melanoma, vulvar cancer, and breast cancer. These findings suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy can replace complete lymphadenectomies as the standard of care for surgical staging in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinosarcoma/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/cirugía , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirugía , Carcinosarcoma/cirugía , Colorantes , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias Quísticas, Mucinosas y Serosas/cirugía
9.
PLoS One ; 16(1): e0243782, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at high risk of anemia, and phlebotomy is a potentially modifiable source of blood loss. Our objective was to quantify daily phlebotomy volume for ICU patients, including blood discarded as waste during vascular access, and evaluate the impact of phlebotomy volume on patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study between September 2014 and August 2015 at a tertiary care academic medical-surgical ICU. A prospective audit of phlebotomy practices in March 2018 was used to estimate blood waste during vascular access. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate phlebotomy volume as a predictor of ICU nadir hemoglobin < 80 g/L, and red blood cell transfusion. RESULTS: There were 428 index ICU admissions, median age 64.4 yr, 41% female. Forty-four patients (10%) with major bleeding events were excluded. Mean bedside waste per blood draw (144 draws) was: 3.9 mL from arterial lines, 5.5 mL central venous lines, and 6.3 mL from peripherally inserted central catheters. Mean phlebotomy volume per patient day was 48.1 ± 22.2 mL; 33.1 ± 15.0 mL received by the lab and 15.0 ± 8.1 mL discarded as bedside waste. Multivariable regression, including age, sex, admission hemoglobin, sequential organ failure assessment score, and ICU length of stay, showed total daily phlebotomy volume was predictive of hemoglobin <80 g/L (p = 0.002), red blood cell transfusion (p<0.001), and inpatient mortality (p = 0.002). For every 5 mL increase in average daily phlebotomy the odds ratio for nadir hemoglobin <80 g/L was 1.18 (95% CI 1.07-1.31) and for red blood cell transfusion was 1.17 (95% CI 1.07-1.28). CONCLUSION: A substantial portion of daily ICU phlebotomy is waste discarded during vascular access. Average ICU phlebotomy volume is independently associated with ICU acquired anemia and red blood cell transfusion which supports the need for phlebotomy stewardship programs.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Daño del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Flebotomía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/etiología , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Flebotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...