RESUMEN
Background: Although nitrous oxide (N2O) has been used since the 1880s for labor analgesia, its popularity has only recently increased in the United States. In 2011, only 3 centers in the country offered N2O, but as of 2020, several hundred labor units have adopted its use. Methods: We reviewed the literature and summarize the mechanism of action, clinical uses, and efficacy of N2O for labor analgesia, as well as patient satisfaction related to its use. Results: N2O has several proposed mechanisms of action that make it a viable option for all 3 stages of labor and postpartum procedures. N2O has been shown to be a safe option for both mom and baby during labor and delivery. Studies support N2O as an analgesic for laboring. Even though 40% to 60% of women who use N2O convert to a labor epidural analgesia, satisfaction surveys indicate that analgesia is not the only factor contributing to the use of N2O during labor. Conclusion: The use of N2O has increased in labor and delivery units across the United States since 2011. Despite inferior analgesic properties compared to epidural analgesia, N2O offers a safe alternative for many parturients who want a greater sense of control and mobility.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cesarean deliveries are increasing, and associated postoperative adverse events are extending hospitalizations. The aims of the present study were to analyze the role of anesthestic predictors during cesarean delivery on the incidences of extended postpartum hospital length of stay (>4 postoperative days) and adverse events. METHODS: The medical records of 840 consecutive patients who underwent cesarean delivery during a 1-year period were abstracted. Previously reported anesthetic predictors underwent recursive partitioning with 5-fold cross-validation and with LogWorth values ≥2.0 statistically significant at the <0.01 level. RESULTS: In this study of 840 cesarean delivery patients, 120 parturients (14.3%; confidence interval 12.1%-16.8%) experienced extended postpartum hospital length of stay (>4 hospital days). One anesthetic predictor associated with extended postpartum hospital length of stay was type of anesthetic technique: a 25.6% incidence in parturients receiving general or epidural anesthesia compared to a 9.6% incidence in parturients receiving either spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (LogWorth value of 7.3). When the amount of intravenous fluids intraoperatively administered to Americian Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III and IV parturients was ≥2,000 mL, the incidence of extended postpartum hospital length of stay decreased from a baseline value of 30.0% to 17.3% (LogWorth value of 2.8). The incidence of adverse events ranged from 0%-5.0%. All regional anesthetic techniques were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of adverse events: 0.7% with spinal anesthesia, 1.9% with epidural anesthesia, and 3.2% with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia when compared to the 51.4% incidence associated with general anesthesia (LogWorth value of 4.0). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that type of anesthetic technique and amount of intraoperative fluids administered during cesarean delivery have important effects on the incidences of extended postpartum hospital length of stay and adverse events following cesarean delivery.