RESUMEN
Caring for children and their families at the end-of-life is an essential but challenging aspect of care in the PICU. During and following a child's death, families often report a simultaneous need for protected privacy and ongoing supportive presence from staff. Balancing these seemingly paradoxical needs can be difficult for PICU staff and can often lead to the family feeling intruded upon or abandoned during their end-of-life experience. In this "Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Perspectives" piece, we reframe provision of privacy at the end-of-life in the PICU and describe an essential principle that aims to help the interprofessional PICU team simultaneously meet these two opposing family needs: "Supported Privacy." In addition, we offer concrete recommendations to actualize "Supported Privacy" in the PICU, focusing on environmental considerations, practical needs, and emotional responses. By incorporating the principles of "Supported Privacy" into end-of-life care practices, clinicians can support the delivery of high-quality care that meets the needs of children and families navigating the challenges and supports of end-of-life in the PICU.
Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Privacidad , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Cuidado Terminal/ética , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administración , Niño , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Familia/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Siblings are an important yet often forgotten part of the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) family experience. Commonly, siblings are supported through the experience by their parents; however, very little is known about parental experiences of providing this support. This study aims to explore parental experiences of supporting sibling inclusion in PICU. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: This study utilised a qualitative descriptive approach to conduct semi-structured interviews with 6 parents of 5 children with congenital heart disease who had spent time in PICU. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. SETTING: Australian PICUs. FINDINGS: Parental considerations and experiences for sibling inclusion were identified across three key phases: Pre-inclusion, The PICU visit, and Post-inclusion. Prior to including siblings in PICU, parents considered various ways of sharing information with siblings, and weighed up the risks and benefits of bringing siblings into PICU. Parents also recounted a number of challenges and facilitators to a positive sibling experience in PICU, including supportive staff and fun activities. Finally, parents, identified that siblings require ongoing support after their inclusion in PICU and made suggestions for ongoing availability of information and supportive resources. CONCLUSIONS: This study has illuminated key parental experiences when supporting sibling inclusion in PICU before, during and after their visit. By understanding these parental experiences, PICU staff can work with and support parents where needed, helping to achieve a positive sibling inclusion experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Parents need ongoing support to explain the PICU to siblings of critically ill children and may benefit from specific visual resources to aid communication. In addition, PICUs should aim to ensure the physical layout is supportive of sibling needs, with dedicated spaces for siblings to play and take time out during their experience.