RESUMEN
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death from gynecological tumors. Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer develop recurrence after concluding first-line therapy, making further lines of therapy necessary. The choice of therapy depends on various criteria such as tumor biology, the patient's general condition (ECOG), toxicity, previous chemotherapy, and response to chemotherapy. The platinum-free or treatment-free interval determines the potential response to repeat platinum-based therapy. If patients have late recurrence, i.e. > 6 months after the end of the last platinum-based therapy (i.e., they were previously platinum-sensitive), then they are usually considered suitable for another round of a platinum-based combination therapy. Patients who are not considered suitable for platinum-based chemotherapy are treated with a platinum-free regimen such as weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), gemcitabine, or topotecan. Treatment for the patient subgroup which is considered suitable for platinum-based therapy but cannot receive carboplatin due to uncontrollable hypersensitivity reactions may consist of trabectedin and PLD. While the use of surgery to treat recurrence has long been a controversial issue, new findings from the DESKTOP III study of the AGO working group have drawn attention to this issue again, particularly for patients with a platinum-free interval of > 6 months and a positive AGO score. Clinical studies have also shown the efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and the PARP inhibitors olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib. These drugs have substantially changed current treatment practice and expanded the range of available therapies. It is important to differentiate between purely maintenance therapy after completing CTX, continuous maintenance therapy during CTX, and the therapeutic use of these substances. The PARP inhibitors niraparib, olaparib and rucaparib have already been approved for use by the FDA and the EMA. The presence of a BRCA mutation is a predictive factor for a better response to PARP inhibitors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tissue factor (TF) is involved in tumor growth and metastasis and contributes to venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer, including gynecological malignancies. The diagnostic value of microvesicle-associated TF procoagulant activity (MV TF PCA) in women with suspected ovarian cancer, however, has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MV TF PCA as a diagnostic tool in women with an ovarian mass of unknown etiology and as a predictive biomarker for perioperative VTE. METHODS: Plasma MVs were isolated by high-speed centrifugation and analyzed for TF-specific PCA by single-stage clotting assay. In addition, plasma TF antigen and soluble P-selectin (sCD62P) were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: D-Dimer, MV TF PCA, and sCD62P, but not the tumor marker, CA-125, significantly differentiated patients with malignant (n=40) from those with benign tumors (n=15) and healthy controls (n=34). In cancer patients, only D-Dimer and CA-125 correlated with the FIGO stage. An abnormal D-dimer had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of cancer, while MV TF PCA above the ROC curve-derived cut-off value of 182U/mL had the highest specificity. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, addition of MV TF PCA conferred diagnostic benefit to the single variables, CA-125 (p=0.052) and D-dimer (p=0.019). Perioperative VTE occurred in 16% of cancer patients and was associated with an advanced FIGO stage, but not MV TF PCA. There was no difference in plasma TF antigen levels between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: MV TF PCA, but not plasma TF antigen, may provide valuable additional information for the diagnostic work-up of women with suspected ovarian cancer.
