Loss of BAP1 expression in metastatic tumor tissue is an event of poor prognosis in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of the protein expression of both PBRM1 and BAP1 in metastatic tissue of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all 124 consecutive cases of metastatic ccRCC, who underwent metastasectomy or biopsy of metastatic tumor tissue between 2007 and 2016 were selected from the medical records of our institution. Additionally, 38 paired cases with tissue from the primary tumor involving radical or partial nephrectomy for ccRCC were also selected. All cases were reviewed for uniform reclassification and the most representative tumor areas were selected for the construction of a tissue microarray. RESULTS: PBRM1 nuclear staining of the 124-immunostained metastases of ccRCC specimens showed that 98 (79.0%) had negative expression and 26 (21.0%) positive expression of PBRM1. Regarding BAP1 expression, we observed that 77 (62.1%) specimens were negative and 47 (37.9%) showed positive nuclear staining. When we compared the expression of both markers on primary tumor and tumor metastasis, we found disagreement in half of the cases. Five-year overall survival rates in patients with positive expression and negative expression of BAP1 were 53.2% and 35.1%, respectively (P = 0.004). Five-year progression-free survival rates in patients with positive expression and negative expression of BAP1 were 14.9% and 3.9%, respectively (P = 0.003). Conversely, PBRM1 expression did not significantly influence either overall survival or progression-free survival rates. In multivariate analysis, negative expression of BAP1 tumors also presented higher risks of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.913, P = 0.041) and disease progression (HR = 1.656, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The use of prognostic biomarkers identified in the primary tumor tissue might be not reliable in the metastatic disease scenario. Patients with metastatic ccRCC that present loss of BAP1 expression in metastatic tissue demonstrated poor survival rates and represent a relevant risk group for tumor recurrence and death.

Prognostic impact of concomitant loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 protein expression in early stages of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical expression of BAP1 and PBRM1 in patients with early stage (pT1-pT2N0M0) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 441 consecutive patients treated surgically for stages I and II (TNM-AJCC 2010) ccRCC between 1990 and 2016 were selected. All cases were reviewed for uniform reclassification and the most representative tumor areas were selected for the construction of a tissue microarray. Sixty-two patients had frozen tumoral tissue available in the tumor bank of our institution for quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. RESULTS: Of the 441-immunostained ccRCC specimens, 91 (20.6%) and 107 (24.3%) showed negative-expression of PBRM1 and BAP1, respectively. Fifty-eight (13.2%) showed negative-expression of both markers (PBRM1-/BAP-). There was an association between both markers expression pattern and classical parameters, such as pT stage (P<0.001), tumor size (P<0.001), and tumor grade (P<0.001). Both independent PBRM1 and BAP1 negative-expression were associated with lower rates of disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival. When patients were grouped into presence of positive expression of one or both markers vs. PBRM1-/BAP1- patients, disease-specific survival and rates were 95.3% vs. 77.6%, respectively (P<0.001). PBRM1-/BAP1-group presented a higher risk of cancer specific death (hazard ratio = 2.722, P = 0.007) and disease recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.467, P = 0.004) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with early stage tumors that present concomitant loss of both PBRM1 and BAP1 demonstrated worse survival rates and represent a relevant risk group for tumor recurrence and death.

Assessment of Treatment Patterns for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Although multiple therapies have emerged for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it is unclear whether application of these agents is consistent in developed and developing countries. We sought to determine patterns of care for mRCC in Brazil as a representative developing country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A commercial database was used to acquire information pertaining to patients with mRCC receiving treatment at private or public hospitals in Brazil between March 2013 and October 2016. Basic clinical and demographic criteria were available, as well as information to ascertain the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk. Treatment-related data across multiple lines of therapy were collected. RESULTS: Of 4,379 patients assessed, 3,990 (91%) had metastatic disease, and 26%, 48%, and 26% of patients had good, intermediate, and poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk disease, respectively. Although 3,149 patients (79%) received first-line therapy, only 641 (20%) and 152 (5%) received second- and third-line therapy, respectively. In the first-line setting, vascular endothelial growth factor-directed agents represented the most commonly used therapy, whereas in the second-line setting, vascular endothelial growth factor- and mammalian target of rapamycin-directed agents were used with similar frequency. Marked differences were seen in receipt of systemic therapy on the basis of treatment in private or public hospitals. CONCLUSION: Relative to developed countries, marked attrition is noted between each subsequent line of therapy in Brazil. Patterns of care also vary greatly in private and public settings, pointing to financial constraints as a potential cause for discordances in treatment.

Tissue Expression of Erythropoietin Predicts Survival Rates in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate immunohistochemical erythropoietin (EPO) expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), its association with major clinicopathological variables and its prognostic impact. METHODS: A total of 220 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) surgically treated between 1989 and 2009 were evaluated in this multi-institutional study. All the cases were reviewed by a single pathologist and the immunohistochemical reactivity to EPO was analysed using tissue microarray. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with ccRCC were considered, with an average of 48 months of follow-up. Of the tumours evaluated, 47 (26.7%) were negative for EPO expression, and 129 (73.3%) were positive. EPO expression was associated with incidental tumour (p = 0.016), tumour size (p = 0.015), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) (p = 0.016), blood transfusion (p = 0.009) and adrenal involvement (p = 0.038). The median ages of the patients with positive and negative EPO expression were 56.2 years and 66.6 years. Immunohistochemical EPO expression affected overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates. The DSS rates of the patients whose tissue was positive and negative for EPO expression were 85.3% and 76.1%, respectively (p = 0.044). In a multivariate analysis, the absence of EPO expression proved to be a bad prognostic factor and negatively affected the OS (p < 0.001) and DSS (p < 0.001) rates. CONCLUSION: The absence of tumour EPO expression is an independent predictive factor with a negative effect on survival rates. The use of EPO as possible marker in the management of ccRCC patients requires further studies and a better understanding of the role of EPO in tumour biology.