Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Endoscopy ; 51(2): 169-173, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30005444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proximal esophageal stents are poorly tolerated and have a high risk of complications. We report our experience using fully covered, biliary, self-expandable metal stents (B-SEMS) and narrow-diameter, esophageal, self-expandable metal stents (NDE-SEMS) for this group of patients. METHODS: 24 patients underwent placement of B-SEMS or NDE-SEMS for proximal esophageal lesions between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2016. The outcomes included improvement of dysphagia, healing of fistulas, and adverse events. RESULTS: 10 patients received B-SEMS and 14 had NDE-SEMS. Median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 0.5 - 62 months). In both cohorts, stents were left in place for a mean of 6 weeks. The dysphagia score decreased in 7 (70 %) and 10 (71.4 %) patients, and fistulas resolved in 3/5 (60.0 %) and 5/8 (62.5 %) patients with B-SEMS and NDE-SEMS, respectively. Stent migration occurred in three patients (30.0 %) with B-SEMS and five patients (35.7 %) with NDE-SEMS. CONCLUSIONS: Both stents were well tolerated and resulted in overall improvement of dysphagia in 70.8 % of patients. B-SEMS appeared to be more favorable for cervical esophageal lesions with narrower diameters, while NDE-SEMS may be better for more distal lesions.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/prevención & control , Estenosis Esofágica/cirugía , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Adulto , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Remoción de Dispositivos , Estenosis Esofágica/complicaciones , Femenino , Florida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Clin Transplant ; 30(10): 1236-1241, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27423053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparations can necessitate early repeat of colonoscopy and increased healthcare costs. Established risk factors for suboptimal bowel preparation are known, yet data are lacking in the specific subgroup of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The primary aim of this study was to reduce inadequate bowel preparation rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplant via a quality improvement initiative targeting patient education. METHODS: A total of 121 patients undergoing evaluation at our institution prior to implementation of the quality improvement initiative and 91 patients undergoing evaluation after implementation were included. The initiative was an educational intervention via a 6-minute colonoscopy and split-prep bowel preparation educational video during the initial liver transplantation evaluation visit for all patients with scheduled colonoscopy. RESULTS: Inadequate bowel preparation was observed in 36 patients (29.8%) in the pre-intervention period compared to 29 patients (31.9%) in the post-intervention period. This corresponded to a lack of a significant difference in both single-variable analysis and multivariable analysis. Of note, there was a significantly higher rate of inadequate bowel preparation as ascites worsened (P=.028). CONCLUSION: Patient educational video failed to improve bowel preparations in patients undergoing colonoscopy with decompensated cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Trasplante de Hígado , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Catárticos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Polietilenglicoles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grabación en Video
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...