Risk factors for surgical site infection after abdominal hysterectomy, New York State, 2015-2018.

BACKGROUND: To identify risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) after abdominal hysterectomy (HYST) procedures using National Health care Safety Network (NHSN) data augmented with diagnosis codes available using administrative data. METHODS: We analyzed 66,001 HYST procedures in 166 New York State hospitals between January 2015 and December 2018, reported in NHSN, and matched to billing data. Risks factors for SSI after abdominal HYST were identified using logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 66,001 HYST procedures were analyzed. SSI was reported following 1,093 procedures, resulting in an infection rate of 1.66%. Risk factors associated with SSIs were open approach (not laparoscopic) with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 2.72 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.37-3.12, contaminated or dirty wound class (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.61-3.24), body mass index ≥30 (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.56-2.02), procedures lasting 186 minutes or more (AOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.56-2.02), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score ≥3 (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.52-1.99), gynecological cancer (AOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32-1.80), and diabetes mellitus (AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, prolonged procedure duration, diabetes mellitus, wound contamination, open approach, ASA score ≥3, and gynecological cancer were significant independent risk factors associated with SSI after HYST.

Infection Prevention and Control in the Podiatric Medical Setting. Challenges to Providing Consistently Safe Care.

Unsafe practices are an underestimated contributor to the disease burden of bloodborne viruses. Outbreaks associated with failures in basic infection prevention have been identified in nonhospital settings with increased frequency in the United States during the past 15 years, representing an alarming trend and indicating that the challenge of providing consistently safe care is not always met. As has been the case with most medical specialties, public health investigations by state and local health departments, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have identified some instances of unsafe practices that have placed podiatric medical patients at risk for viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. All health-care providers, including podiatric physicians, must make infection prevention a priority in any setting in which care is delivered.

Notes from the field: Adverse events associated with administration of simulation intravenous fluids to patients--United States, 2014.

On December 23, 2014, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was notified of adverse health events in two patients who had been inadvertently administered nonsterile, simulation 0.9% sodium chloride intravenous (IV) fluids at an urgent care facility. Simulation saline is a nonsterile product not meant for human or animal use; it is intended for use by medical trainees practicing IV administration of saline on mannequins or other training devices. Both patients experienced a febrile illness during product administration and were hospitalized; one patient developed sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Neither patient died. Staff members at the clinic reported having ordered the product through their normal medical supply distributor and not recognizing during administration that it was not intended for human use.

Infection Prevention and Control in the Podiatric Medical Setting: Challenges to Providing Consistently Safe Care.

Unsafe practices are an underestimated contributor to the disease burden of bloodborne viruses. Outbreaks associated with failures in basic infection prevention have been identified in nonhospital settings with increased frequency in the United States during the past 15 years, representing an alarming trend and indicating that the challenge of providing consistently safe care is not always met. As has been the case with most medical specialties, there have been public health investigations by state and local health departments, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have identified some instances of unsafe practices that have placed podiatric medical patients at risk for viral, bacterial, and fungal infections. All health-care providers, including podiatric physicians, must make infection prevention a priority in any setting in which care is delivered.

Transmission of hepatitis B virus associated with assisted monitoring of blood glucose at an assisted living facility in New York State.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission has been reported after patient-to-patient blood exposure during assisted monitoring of blood glucose (AMBG). Three assisted-living facility (ALF) residents who underwent AMBG developed acute HBV infection (HBVI) within 10 days. We investigated HBV transmission and implemented preventive measures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Infection control practices were assessed. HBVI screening was conducted for all staff and epidemiologically linked residents. Viral DNA sequences were compared for a subset of isolates. RESULTS: Lancing devices and glucometers were shared among residents without proper sanitization. Serologic testing of all 34 residents with diabetes and 12 epidemiologically linked residents present during the exposure period detected 6 residents with diabetes with current HBVI and 4 residents with diabetes and 1 epidemiologically linked resident with previous HBVI. A cohort study of 32 individuals with diabetes identified AMBG as a significant risk factor for HBVI (relative risk, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-26.3). Viral DNA sequences for 5 AMBG-exposed residents' isolates were identical, suggesting a common source. CONCLUSIONS: AMBG was significantly associated with HBVI in ALF residents with diabetes. Despite clear preventive recommendations, bloodborne pathogen transmission continues to occur in the setting of AMBG. Strengthening direct care provider, infection preventionist, and health department partnerships with ALFs is crucial to ensure safe AMBG practices and prevent HBV transmission.

Multiple clusters of hepatitis virus infections associated with anesthesia for outpatient endoscopy procedures.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be transmitted during administration of intravenous anesthesia when medication vials are used for multiple patients using incorrect technique. We investigated an outbreak of acute HBV and HCV infections among patients who received anesthesia during endoscopy procedures from the same anesthesiologist (anesthesiologist 1), in 2 different gastroenterology clinics. METHODS: Chart reviews, patient interviews, clinic site visits and infection control assessments, and molecular sequencing of patient isolates were performed. Patients treated by anesthesiologist 1 on specific procedure days were offered testing for blood-borne pathogens. Endoscopy and anesthesia procedures were reviewed; HCV quasispecies analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six cases of outbreak-associated HCV infection and 6 cases of outbreak-associated HBV infection were identified in clinic 1. One outbreak-associated HCV infection was identified in clinic 2. HCV quasispecies sequences from the patients were nearly identical (96.9%-100%) to those from source patients with chronic viral hepatitis. All affected patients in both clinics received propofol from anesthesiologist 1, who inappropriately used a single-patient-use vial of propofol for multiple patients. Reuse of syringes to redose patients, with resulting contamination of medication vials used for subsequent patients, likely resulted in viral transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve persons acquired HBV and HCV infections (6 hepatitis C, 5 hepatitis B, and 1 coinfection) in 2 separate offices as a result of receiving anesthesia from anesthesiologist 1. Gastroenterologists are urged to review carefully the injection, medication handling, and other infection control practices of all staff under their supervision, including providers of anesthesia services.