Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 37(3): 1262-1270, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37026411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rumen juice analysis (RJA) involves analysis of a 10mL sample within minutes after sampling. However, it can be challenging to collect 10 mL of rumen juice (RJ) from some ruminants, and clinical circumstances can delay RJA. OBJECTIVES: Quantify the effect of sample volume (2, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mL), and time-to-analysis (0, 30, and 60 minutes) on RJA. ANIMALS: Cannulated cow. METHODS: Observational experimental study. Two liters of RJ were collected at 26 separate times. The samples were subdivided into 2 duplicates of each sample volume at each sampling time; and analyzed at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after collection. Rumen juice analysis included pH measurement, methylene blue reduction time (MBRT), and protozoal motility. RESULTS: The pH of 2 and 5 mL samples was significantly (P = .01) higher than the pH of 50 and 100 mL samples at all time points. The MBRT was significantly lower (faster bacterial reduction) for 100 mL samples compared to all other samples at 0 minute and to 2, 5, and 50 mL samples at 30 min. The pH and MBRT at 60 minutes were significantly higher than at 0 minute for all volumes (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). For large protozoa, small sample volumes (2 and 5 mL) had significantly lower protozoal motility (scores of 5 and 4.5, respectively) compared to 100 mL samples at 60 minutes (score of 4; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Interpretation of RJA could be affected by small sample volumes and delays to analysis. Sample volumes of ≥10 mL analyzed within 30 minutes after collection are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Rumen , Femenino , Animales , Bovinos , Rumen/microbiología , Rumen/parasitología
2.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 257(11): 1165-1170, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33226291

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize injuries and describe medical management and clinical outcomes of goats, sheep, and pigs treated at a veterinary medical teaching hospital for burn injuries sustained during wildfires. ANIMALS: Goats (n = 9), sheep (12), and pigs (7) that sustained burn injuries from wildfires. PROCEDURES: Medical records were searched to identify goats, sheep, and pigs that had burn injuries associated with California wildfires in 2006, 2015, and 2018. Data regarding signalment, physical examination findings, treatments, clinical outcomes, time to discharge from the hospital, and reasons for death or euthanasia were recorded. RESULTS: The eyes, ears, nose, mouth, hooves, perineum, and ventral aspect of the abdomen were most commonly affected in both goats and sheep. In pigs, the ventral aspect of the abdomen, distal limb extremities, ears, and tail were most commonly affected. The median (range) time to discharge from the hospital for goats and pigs was 11 (3 to 90) and 85.5 (54 to 117) days, respectively. One of 9 goats, 12 of 12 sheep, and 5 of 7 pigs died or were euthanized. Laminitis and devitalization of distal limb extremities were common complications (13/28 animals) and a common reason for considering euthanasia in sheep and pigs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Burn injuries in small ruminants and pigs required prolonged treatment in some cases. Results suggested prognosis for survival may be more guarded for sheep and pigs with burn injuries than for goats; however, further research is needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Enfermedades de las Cabras , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Enfermedades de los Porcinos , Incendios Forestales , Animales , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Cabras/terapia , Cabras , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/terapia , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...