Twenty-four months of follow-up in women with rebound-associated vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a single-centre case series.

Evidence on the management of rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation is scarce. This study describes seven patients retreated with denosumab, teriparatide or zoledronate for 24 months. Their bone mineral density remained stable or improved and no new fractures occurred suggesting that all three options might be adequate for their treatment. PURPOSE: To describe the densitometric and biochemical changes achieved with osteoactive treatment after 24 months of follow-up in patients who suffered rebound-associated vertebral fractures (RAVFs) after Dmab discontinuation, and to report the occurrence of new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients with RAVFs who received retreatment (RT) for 24 months were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH), along with C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase. Data were collected at the start of the RT and after 24 months. RESULTS: Seven female patients were included. RT consisted in Dmab (n = 3), teriparatide (TPT) (n = 3) and zoledronate (Zol) (n = 1). At 24 months, the mean BMD change was 2.2% at LS, 6.8% at FN and 3.8% at TH in the Dmab group, 7.5% at LS, 1.4% at FN and 3.7% at TH in the TPT group and, 5.0% at LS, 0.6% at FN and 3.9% at TH in the patient with Zol. After 24 months of follow-up, no patient suffered new fractures. CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with RAVFs, we did not observe any new fractures and the BMD remained stable after 24 months of RT. Future studies are needed to evaluate the most suitable treatment approach after RAVFs but these preliminary data suggest that all denosumab, zoledronate and teriparatide might be adequate options.

[Pituitary cryptococcoma: a strange case of secondary granulomatous hypophysitis]. / Cryptococcoma hipofisiario: un extraño caso de hipofisitis granulomatosa secundaria.

Hypophysitis is a pathology with low incidence and prevalence. Likewise, deep fungal infections in immunocompetent patients also represent a rare phenomenon. Even rarer is the case described below, where these two mentioned elements are combined, namely: pituitary cryptococcoma or granulomatous hypophysitis caused by said pathogen in a host without altered immune response. After research in PubMed, there are limited cases in the medical literature of granulomatous hypophysitis caused by Cryptococcus spp., which simulated a pituitary macroadenoma by clinical and imaging manifestations. We did not find reports in which there is no evidence of involvement of the meningeal tissue. The fungal etiology is scarcely described in the reference guidelines for hypophysitis and we believe that Cryptococcus spp. it should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of secondary granulomatous hypophysitis since it is a ubiquitous pathogen and the treatment is substantially different from other entities. It becomes more relevant given the current trend towards the use of high-dose systemic glucocorticoids for the treatment of hypophysitis, which could have generated greater damage if the correct diagnosis had not been made.

La hipofisitis es una afección con baja incidencia y prevalencia. Asimismo, las infecciones profundas por hongos en pacientes inmunocompetentes también representan un fenómeno infrecuente. Más raro aún es el caso que se describe a continuación, en donde se conjugan estos dos elementos mencionados, a saber: cryptococcoma hipofisario o hipofisitis granulomatosa causado por dicho patógeno en un huésped sin alteración de la respuesta inmune. Luego de una búsqueda realizada en PubMed, existen limitados casos en la literatura médica de hipofisitis granulomatosa por Cryptococcus spp., que simuló por manifestaciones clínicas e imagenológicas un macroadenoma hipofisario. No encontramos informes en los que no haya evidencia de afectación del tejido meníngeo. La etiología micótica está escasamente descrita en las guías de referencia para hipofisitis y creemos que Cryptococcus spp. debe ser tenido en cuenta en el diagnóstico diferencial de las hipofisitis granulomatosas secundarias dado que es un patógeno ubicuo y el tratamiento es sustancialmente diferente a otras entidades. Cobra mayor relevancia ante la tendencia actual al uso de glucocorticoides sistémicos a altas dosis para el tratamiento de la hipofisitis, que podría haber generado mayor daño de no haberse hecho el diagnóstico correcto.

Cryptococcoma hipofisiario: un extraño caso de hipofisitis granulomatosa secundaria / Pituitary cryptococcoma: a strange case of secondary granulomatous hypophysitis

Resumen La hipofisitis es una afección con baja incidencia y prevalencia. Asimismo, las infecciones profundas por hongos en pacientes inmunocompetentes también re presentan un fenómeno infrecuente. Más raro aún es el caso que se describe a continuación, en donde se conjugan estos dos elementos mencionados, a saber: cryptococcoma hipofisario o hipofisitis granulomatosa causado por dicho patógeno en un huésped sin altera ción de la respuesta inmune. Luego de una búsqueda realizada en PubMed, existen limitados casos en la literatura médica de hipofisitis granulomatosa por Cryptococcus spp., que simuló por manifestaciones clínicas e imagenológicas un macro adenoma hipofisario. No encontramos informes en los que no haya evidencia de afectación del tejido meníngeo. La etiología micótica está escasamente descrita en las guías de referencia para hipofisitis y creemos que Cryp tococcus spp. debe ser tenido en cuenta en el diagnóstico diferencial de las hipofisitis granulomatosas secundarias dado que es un patógeno ubicuo y el tratamiento es sustancialmente diferente a otras entidades. Cobra mayor relevancia ante la tendencia actual al uso de glucocorticoides sistémicos a altas dosis para el tratamiento de la hipofisitis, que podría haber gene rado mayor daño de no haberse hecho el diagnóstico correcto.

Abstract Hypophysitis is a pathology with low incidence and prevalence. Likewise, deep fungal infections in immuno competent patients also represent a rare phenomenon. Even rarer is the case described below, where these two mentioned elements are combined, namely: pituitary cryptococcoma or granulomatous hypophysitis caused by said pathogen in a host without altered immune response. After research in PubMed, there are limited cases in the medical literature of granulomatous hypophysitis caused by Cryptococcus spp., which simulated a pituitary macroadenoma by clinical and imaging manifestations. We did not find reports in which there is no evidence of involvement of the meningeal tissue. The fungal etiology is scarcely described in the reference guidelines for hypophysitis and we believe that Cryptococcus spp. it should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of secondary granuloma tous hypophysitis since it is a ubiquitous pathogen and the treatment is substantially different from other entities. It becomes more relevant given the current trend towards the use of high-dose systemic glucocorticoids for the treatment of hypophysitis, which could have generated greater damage if the correct diagnosis had not been made.