RESUMEN
The extent to which evidence-based practices (EBPs) are considered cost-effective influences educators' adoption decisions. However, what it means to be cost-effective and how to interpret cost-effectiveness ratios may be unclear. This systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of EBPs in schools illuminates the many sources of variability in published estimates. Studies were limited to peer-reviewed, school-based studies conducted in the United States between 2000 and 2020. Seven studies examining eight programs were identified and then coded for program descriptions, outcomes, research designs, and cost-effectiveness methodology. Secondary analyses illustrated how published estimates can be adjusted to reduce methodological variability and increase the utility of comparisons. The small number of studies highlights the need for research to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of more EBPs. Implications for research and practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
RESUMEN
Schools are the most common site to implement evidence-based prevention programs and practices (EBPs) to improve behavioral and mental health outcomes among children and adolescents. Research has highlighted the critical role of school administrators in the adoption, implementation, and evaluation of such EBPs, focusing on the factors they should consider during the adoption decision and the behaviors needed for successful implementation. However, scholars have only recently begun to focus on the de-adoption or de-implementation of low-value programs and practices to make room for evidence-based alternatives. This study introduces escalation of commitment as a theoretical framework for understanding why school administrators may stick with ineffective programs and practices. Escalation of commitment is a robust decision-making bias in which people feel compelled to continue with a course of action even when performance indicators suggest it is not going well. Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 building- and district-level school administrators in the Midwestern United States. Results suggested that escalation of commitment occurs when administrators attribute the underlying causes of poor program performance not to the program itself but instead to issues related to implementation, leadership, or the limitations of the performance indicators themselves. We also identified a variety of psychological, organizational, and external determinants that accentuate administrators' continuance of ineffective prevention programs. Based on our findings, we highlight several contributions to theory and practice.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Instituciones Académicas , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Medio Oeste de Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Despite decades of research, much is still unknown regarding how specific learning disability (SLD) identification decisions are made, particularly how language related to sociodemographic and psychosocial factors may impact decision-making. This study employed the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) method to examine the language used in school psychological reports to better understand how sociodemographic (i.e., race, socioeconomic background, and gender) and psychosocial factors (e.g., positive and negative emotion, student effort, and student social processes) related to SLD identification within a Response to Intervention (RtI) identification method. The reports of students identified as SLD contained significantly more achievement-related language (e.g., hardworking, motivated, exerting effort) compared to students who were not identified as SLD, and achievement-related language was associated with SLD identification above and beyond RtI evaluation data (i.e., academic achievement and slope). Implications for research and practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
