Biomarkers of systemic inflammation provide additional prognostic stratification in cancers of unknown primary.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation have been shown to predict outcomes in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). We sought to validate these findings in patients with confirmed CUP (cCUP) and explore their role alongside existing clinicopathological prognostic categories. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CUP oncologist from across the United Kingdom were invited to include patients with cCUP referred to their local CUP multidisciplinary team. Patient demographics, clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Data were available for 548 patients from four CUP services. 23% (n = 124) of patients met clinicopathological criteria for favourable-risk cCUP. On multivariate analysis c-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS: combining albumin and neutrophil count) (p < 0.001) were independently predictive of survival. CRP and SIPS effectively stratified survival in patients with both favourable-risk and poor-risk cCUP based on clinicopathological features. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are reliable prognostic factors in patients with cCUP, regardless of clinicopathological subgroup. We recommend that CRP or SIPS are incorporated into routine clinical assessments of patients with cCUP as a tool to aid investigation and/or treatment decision-making across all groups. Established clinicopathological factors can then be used to inform management pathways and specific systemic anticancer therapy selection.

Characterisation and outcomes of patients referred to a regional cancer of unknown primary team: a 10-year analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, national guidance published in 2010 recommended the establishment of specialist teams to improve clinical pathways for patients presenting with malignancies of undefined primary origin (MUO) and cancer of unknown primary (CUP). This study sought to define outcomes of patients referred to a regional MUO/CUP service. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients (n = 1225) referred to a regional CUP team over a 10-year period. Patient demographics, clinical, pathological and outcome data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Confirmed CUP (cCUP) was diagnosed in 25% of patients. A primary metastatic cancer was identified in 36%, 5% were diagnosed with provisional CUP (pCUP), 27% retained the diagnosis of MUO and in 8% a non-cancer diagnosis was made. Median survival was low in all patients with a final malignant diagnosis: primary identified 9.0 months, cCUP 4.0 months, pCUP 1.5 months and MUO 1.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with MUO have poor outcomes irrespective of the final diagnosis. These patients need a patient-centred, streamlined, rapid diagnostic pathway. There are clear benefits to primary and secondary care teams having access to a dedicated, multidisciplinary MUO/CUP service, with clinical nurse specialists supporting the patients, to help facilitate this pathway and ensure early oncology review.

Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dose-escalation studies are essential in the early stages of developing novel treatments, when the aim is to find a safe dose for administration in humans. Despite their great importance, many dose-escalation studies use study designs based on heuristic algorithms with well-documented drawbacks. Bayesian decision procedures provide a design alternative that is conceptually simple and methodologically sound, but very rarely used in practice, at least in part due to their perceived statistical complexity. There are currently very few easily accessible software implementations that would facilitate their application. METHODS: We have created MoDEsT, a free and easy-to-use web application for designing and conducting single-agent dose-escalation studies with a binary toxicity endpoint, where the objective is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose. MoDEsT uses a well-established Bayesian decision procedure based on logistic regression. The software has a user-friendly point-and-click interface, makes changes visible in real time, and automatically generates a range of graphs, tables, and reports. It is aimed at clinicians as well as statisticians with limited expertise in model-based dose-escalation designs, and does not require any statistical programming skills to evaluate the operating characteristics of, or implement, the Bayesian dose-escalation design. RESULTS: MoDEsT comes in two parts: a 'Design' module to explore design options and simulate their operating characteristics, and a 'Conduct' module to guide the dose-finding process throughout the study. We illustrate the practical use of both modules with data from a real phase I study in terminal cancer. CONCLUSION: Enabling both methodologists and clinicians to understand and apply model-based study designs with ease is a key factor towards their routine use in early-phase studies. We hope that MoDEsT will enable incorporation of Bayesian decision procedures for dose escalation at the earliest stage of clinical trial design, thus increasing their use in early-phase trials.

A first-in-human phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the oral Src/ABL inhibitor AZD0424.

BACKGROUND: Src is involved in cancer invasion and metastasis. AZD0424, an oral inhibitor of Src and ABL1, has shown evidence of anti-tumour activity in pre-clinical studies. METHODS: A phase Ia, dose escalation study was performed to assess the safety of continuous oral dosing with AZD0424 in advanced solid tumours. Secondary objectives included investigation of AZD0424 pharmacokinetics, effect on Src activity using markers of bone turnover, and anti-tumour activity. RESULTS: 41 patients were treated; 34 received AZD0424 once-daily at doses ranging from 5 mg to 150 mg, and 7 received 40 mg bi-daily 41.5% of patients experienced at least one AZD0424-related adverse event that was Grade 3-5 in severity, with patients treated at doses above 60 mg per day experiencing multiple treatment-related toxicities. The most commonly observed AZD0424-related adverse events were nausea, fatigue, anorexia and alopecia. Cmax and AUC increased linearly with dose and the mean±standard deviation t1/2 was 8.4±2.8 h. Clear evidence of Src target inhibition was seen at doses ⩾20 mg per day. No responses were observed and 7 patients (17.1%) achieved stable disease lasting 6 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: AZD0424 displayed no evidence of efficacy as monotherapy despite a clear pharmacodynamic effect. Further evaluation of AZD0424 monotherapy in patients with solid tumours is not recommended.

Embracing model-based designs for dose-finding trials.

BACKGROUND: Dose-finding trials are essential to drug development as they establish recommended doses for later-phase testing. We aim to motivate wider use of model-based designs for dose finding, such as the continual reassessment method (CRM). METHODS: We carried out a literature review of dose-finding designs and conducted a survey to identify perceived barriers to their implementation. RESULTS: We describe the benefits of model-based designs (flexibility, superior operating characteristics, extended scope), their current uptake, and existing resources. The most prominent barriers to implementation of a model-based design were lack of suitable training, chief investigators' preference for algorithm-based designs (e.g., 3+3), and limited resources for study design before funding. We use a real-world example to illustrate how these barriers can be overcome. CONCLUSIONS: There is overwhelming evidence for the benefits of CRM. Many leading pharmaceutical companies routinely implement model-based designs. Our analysis identified barriers for academic statisticians and clinical academics in mirroring the progress industry has made in trial design. Unified support from funders, regulators, and journal editors could result in more accurate doses for later-phase testing, and increase the efficiency and success of clinical drug development. We give recommendations for increasing the uptake of model-based designs for dose-finding trials in academia.

Targeting Carcinoembryonic Antigen with DNA Vaccination: On-Target Adverse Events Link with Immunologic and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: We have clinically evaluated a DNA fusion vaccine to target the HLA-A*0201-binding peptide CAP-1 from carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA605-613) linked to an immunostimulatory domain (DOM) from fragment C of tetanus toxin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-seven patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas were recruited: 15 patients with measurable disease (arm-I) and 12 patients without radiological evidence of disease (arm-II). Six intramuscular vaccinations of naked DNA (1 mg/dose) were administered up to week 12. Clinical and immunologic follow-up was up to week 64 or clinical/radiological disease. RESULTS: DOM-specific immune responses demonstrated successful vaccine delivery. All patients without measurable disease compared with 60% with advanced disease responded immunologically, while 58% and 20% expanded anti-CAP-1 CD8+ T cells, respectively. CAP-1-specific T cells were only detectable in the blood postvaccination but could also be identified in previously resected cancer tissue. The gastrointestinal adverse event diarrhea was reported by 48% of patients and linked to more frequent decreases in CEA (P < 0.001) and improved global immunologic responses [anti-DOM responses of greater magnitude (P < 0.001), frequency (P = 0.004), and duration] compared with patients without diarrhea. In advanced disease patients, decreases in CEA were associated with better overall survival (HR = 0.14, P = 0.017). CAP-1 peptide was detectable on MHC class I of normal bowel mucosa and primary colorectal cancer tissue by mass spectrometry, offering a mechanistic explanation for diarrhea through CD8+ T-cell attack. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that DNA vaccination is able to overcome peripheral tolerance in normal and tumor tissue and warrants testing in combination studies, for example, by vaccinating in parallel to treatment with an anti-PD1 antibody. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4827-36. ©2016 AACR.

A phase I open-label study investigating the disposition of [14C]-cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Cabazitaxel is a semisynthetic taxane approved for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer (now known as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) treated previously with a docetaxel-containing treatment regimen. The human plasma pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel have been described previously, but detailed analyses of the metabolism and excretion pathways of cabazitaxel have not yet been published. Metabolite profiling, quantification, and identification as well as excretion analyses were carried out on samples from patients with advanced solid tumors who received an intravenous infusion of 25 mg/m [C]-cabazitaxel (50 µCi, 1.85 MBq) over 1 h. In plasma, cabazitaxel was the main circulating compound. Seven metabolites were detected, but with each accounting for 5% or less of the parent drug exposure, none were considered relevant metabolites. In excreta, 76.0% of the administered dose was recovered in feces within 2 weeks and 3.7% of the dose was excreted in urine within 1 week. Approximately 20 metabolites were detected in excreta; the main metabolites corresponded to combined mono-O-demethyl or di-O-demethyl derivatives on the taxane ring, with hydroxyl or cyclized derivatives on the lateral chain. Docetaxel (di-O-demethyl-cabazitaxel) was only detected at trace levels in excreta. These results suggest an extensive hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion of cabazitaxel in humans.

A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and various degrees of hepatic function.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of hepatic function. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies, acceptable bone marrow and renal function, and normal or impaired hepatic function, per NCI-ODWG criteria, were eligible. Initially patients received a single oral dose of 30 mg panobinostat for a 1-week pharmacokinetic study (core phase). Subsequently, patients received thrice-weekly panobinostat for as long as beneficial (extension phase safety assessment). Core phase serial blood samples for panobinostat and metabolite BJB432 assay were collected pre-dose and up to 96 h post-dose. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, median age 58 years (range 45-76). Fifteen patients had hepatic dysfunction (8 mild, 6 moderate, and 1 severe). Reductions in panobinostat plasma clearance were 30 and 51 %, with concomitant 43 and 105 % increase in exposure, for patients with mild and moderate hepatic dysfunction, respectively. Median peak plasma concentrations were 1.4-(mild) and 1.8-(moderate) fold higher than the normal group. Hepatic impairment did not alter panobinostat absorption with Tmax unchanged at 2 h. Geometric mean ratios of BJB432 to panobinostat plasma AUC0-∞ were similar in patients with normal, mild, or moderate hepatic impairment. Safety data were consistent with known safety profile of panobinostat in patients with advanced cancers and normal liver function. CONCLUSION: Despite increased plasma exposure, patients with mild or moderate hepatic dysfunction could be safely treated with the same starting dose of panobinostat as patients with normal hepatic function, with careful monitoring and dose adjustments as required.

A phase I/II, multiple-dose, dose-escalation study of siltuximab, an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II study evaluated safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of escalating, multiple doses of siltuximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin (IL)-6 monoclonal antibody derived from a new Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line in patients with advanced/refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the phase I dose-escalation cohorts, 20 patients with advanced/refractory solid tumors received siltuximab 2.8 or 5.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 11 or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously (i.v.). In the phase I expansion (n = 24) and phase II cohorts (n = 40), patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma-2 (KRAS)-mutant tumors, ovarian, pancreatic, or anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) refractory/resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, or H&N cancer received 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The phase II primary efficacy endpoint was complete response, partial response, or stable disease >6 weeks. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (35 colorectal, 29 ovarian, 9 pancreatic, and 11 other) received a median of three (range, 1-45) cycles. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 5.5 mg/kg. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were hepatic function abnormalities (15%), physical health deterioration (12%), and fatigue (11%). Ten percent of patients had siltuximab-related grade ≥3 adverse events. Neutropenia (4%) was the only possibly related adverse event grade ≥3 reported in >1 patient. Serious adverse events were reported in 42%; most were related to underlying disease. The pharmacokinetic profile of CHO-derived siltuximab appears similar to the previous cell line. No objective responses occurred; 5 of 84 patients had stable disease >6 weeks. Hemoglobin increased ≥1.5 g/dL in 33 of 47 patients. At 11 and 15 mg/kg, completely sustained C-reactive protein suppression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Siltuximab monotherapy appears to be well tolerated but without clinical activity in solid tumors, including ovarian and KRAS-mutant cancers. The recommended phase II doses were 11 and 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

Randomized phase 2 study of pegylated SN-38 (EZN-2208) or irinotecan plus cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is cytotoxic in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). SN-38 (10-hydroxy-7-ethyl-camptothecin) is the active metabolite of irinotecan. Attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer chains (pegylation) to SN-38 (EZN-2208) increases the solubility, exposure, and half-life of SN-38. Preclinical studies demonstrated superior in vitro efficacy of EZN-2208 when it was tested in irinotecan-refractory human CRC cell lines. METHODS: Patients with metastatic or locally recurrent CRC who had previously received 5-flurouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan were assigned to receive EZN-2208 monotherapy (9 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for patients with KRAS-mutant tumors only [arm A]), and patients with KRAS wild-type tumors were randomized (2:1) to receive either EZN-2208 plus cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose on day 1 followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly starting on day 8 [arm B]) or irinotecan 125 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days plus cetuximab at the same doses indicated above (arm C). RESULTS: The overall response rate and progression-free survival were 0% and 1.8 months, respectively, in arm A; 10.7% and 4.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-5.8 months), respectively, in arm B; and 14.3% and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.8 months), respectively, in arm C. EZN-2208 was well tolerated in combination with cetuximab. No statistically significant difference in survival was observed between arm B (9.8 months; 95% CI, 7.2-11.2 months) and arm C (9.1 months; 95% CI, 6.0-13.0 months). CONCLUSIONS: EZN-2208, either as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab, was well tolerated in patients with refractory CRC. Overall survival and progression-free survival were similar in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm and the EZN-2208 arm.

Principles of dose finding studies in cancer: a comparison of trial designs.

PURPOSE: One key aim of Phase I cancer studies is to identify the dose of a treatment to be further evaluated in Phase II. We describe, in non-statistical language, three classes of dose-escalation trial design and compare their properties. METHODS: We review three classes of dose-escalation design suitable for Phase I cancer trials: algorithmic approaches (including the popular 3 + 3 design), Bayesian model-based designs and Bayesian curve-free methods. We describe an example from each class and summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the design classes. RESULTS: The main benefit of algorithmic approaches is the simplicity with which they may be communicated: it may be for this reason alone that they are still employed in the vast majority of Phase I trials. Model-based and curve-free Bayesian approaches are preferable to algorithmic methods due to their superior ability to identify the dose with the desired toxicity rate and their allocation of a greater proportion of patients to doses at, or close to, that dose. CONCLUSIONS: For statistical and practical reasons, algorithmic methods cannot be recommended. The choice between a Bayesian model-based or curve-free approach depends on the previous information available about the compound under investigation. If this provides assurance about a particular model form, the model-based approach would be appropriate; if not, the curve-free method would be preferable.

Characterizing the disposition, metabolism, and excretion of an orally active pan-deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat, via trace radiolabeled 14C material in advanced cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Elucidating the metabolic profile of anticancer agent panobinostat is essential during drug development. Disposition, metabolism, and excretion profiles were characterized using trace radiolabeled (14)C-panobinostat in four patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Oral (14)C-panobinostat was administered and serial blood, plasma, and excreta samples were collected up to 7 days postdose for radioactivity and pharmacokinetic analyses. Metabolites in plasma and excreta were profiled using liquid chromatography (LC) with radiometric detection, and their structures elucidated using LC-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Radioactivity (≥87 %) was recovered in excreta within 7 days: 44-77 % dose recovery in feces and 29-51 % in urine. Circulating radioactivity was localized in plasma, with minor partitioning to blood. Minimal recovery in feces (<3.5 % of dose) suggested near-complete oral absorption. Maximum concentrations (median, 21.2 ng/mL; range, 13.4-41.5 ng/mL) were achieved within 1 h, and median (range) terminal half-life, apparent oral, and renal clearance was 30.7 h (27.6-33.2 h), 209 L/h (114-248 L/h), and 3.20 L/h (2.4-5.5 L/h), respectively. Approximately 40 metabolites were circulating in plasma, with biotransformation occurring primarily at the hydroxamic acid side chain and ethyl-methyl indole moiety. Metabolites derived from modification of the hydroxamic acid side chain were inactive for deacetylase inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Panobinostat and its metabolites were excreted in similar amounts through the kidneys and liver with good dose recovery. Panobinostat was rapidly absorbed and cleared primarily through metabolism. Over half of its clearance was attributed to non-CYP-mediated pathways. Thus, CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions with panobinostat are predicted to be minor.

Capecitabine (oral 5-fluorouracil pro-drug) treatment for colorectal carcinoma causing ischaemic chest pain.

We present a case of cardiac ischaemia associated with capecitabine chemotherapy. An elderly female receiving capecitabine chemotherapy developed acute onset severe anterior chest pain associated with ischaemic changes on ECG. The pain and ECG changes failed to respond to thrombolysis and she proceeded to coronary angiogram and stenting of a thrombosed right coronary vessel. She inadvertently recommenced her capecitabine with a further episode of chest pain. On cessation of capecitabine she had no further episodes of chest pain.

The value of adjuvant treatment in young women with breast cancer.

The postoperative management of breast cancer is an ever-changing field. Young patients, in particular, have attracted recent interest as it has become apparent that age alone is a poor prognostic indicator for breast cancer. Adjuvant therapies indisputably delay breast cancer recurrence and save lives, and should be considered for all young patients. Chemotherapy is increasingly being considered appropriate for all women under the age of 35 years, regardless of other risk factors, but poses the particularly difficult problem of infertility for these young women. As the additional benefits of anthracyclines and taxanes in the adjuvant setting become clear, chemotherapy regimens are also becoming increasingly intensive and the risk of myocardial damage and leukaemia should not be ignored. The benefits of chemotherapy need to be weighed against the possible dangers, and therapy should be individualised according to cancer pathology and patient circumstance. Tamoxifen should be given for 5 years to all women whose cancer is estrogen receptor positive, regardless of whether the patient has received chemotherapy. If chemotherapy is not given, the addition of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists to tamoxifen in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancers appears to be beneficial. The addition of LHRH agonists to chemotherapy and tamoxifen is currently being evaluated in randomised trials. Radiotherapy should be given after breast conservation surgery, and should include the axilla if nodes are involved and the axilla has not been surgically cleared. Chest wall radiotherapy should be considered following mastectomy in young women considered at high risk of local recurrence, but the long-term morbidity and mortality of local radiation therapy, which is increased in young women, needs to be considered.