Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes With or Without Prophylactic Carpal Tunnel Release After Distal Radius Fracture Stabilization.

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are frequently complicated by acute carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), which, if unrecognized, can cause permanent median neuropathy. Some surgeons recommend "prophylactic" carpal tunnel release (CTR) during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of DRF. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety data regarding prophylactic vs symptomatic CTR strategies during DRF fixation are lacking. We conducted a retrospective review of two management strategies for DRFs at our institution (2017 to 2019). Group 1 consisted of patients operated on by two surgeons performing ORIF and symptomatic CTR only for acute CTS. Group 2 consisted of patients operated on by a third surgeon performing ORIF and prophylactic CTR on all patients irrespective of median nerve symptoms. The PROs included QuickDASH Wrist and PROMIS physical/mental health preoperatively vs at final follow-up. Demographic information, complications, and return to the operating room were recorded. Group 1 (36 patients) and group 2 (76 patients) were demographically similar. The mechanism of injury was more severe in group 1 (P<.05), but preoperative PROs were similar between the two groups. Eight patients (22.2%) in group 1 had symptomatic CTR for acute CTS. Significant improvement occurred within both groups from preoperative to final follow-up for PROMIS physical function and QuickDASH Wrist scores (P<.05). Intergroup PROs were not significantly different at either time point. One patient in group 1 (2.8%) and 2 patients in group 2 (2.6%) returned to the operating room due to median nerve symptoms (P>.05). A prophylactic CTR strategy is not associated with improved PROs compared with a symptomatic strategy during ORIF of DRF. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e362-e368.].

Should We Hire Our Current Fellow? Hiring Trends and Preferences in Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into hiring trends/preferences in Academic Orthopaedic Spine Surgery after fellowship training. METHODS: Fellowship directors (FDs) listed by the North American Spine Society were surveyed regarding new faculty hiring preferences. Surveys were analyzed/stratified by response using the Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn multiple comparisons test, the Fisher exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test for univariate comparisons. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 52 (61.5%) FDs responded. 32.3% of graduated fellows pursued academic medicine, which was preferred by FDs (3.59 ± 0.67; 1 to 5 scale). From 2015 to 2020, of the 2.25 ± 1.46 faculty members hired per program, 45.8% were former residents/fellows. Top listed hiring qualities were "strong recommendation from a trusted colleague" (84.4%), "prior personal experience, as a resident/fellow" (78.1%), and "amicable personality" (53.1%). Twelve (38%) answered "no", six (19%) "yes", and 14 (44%) "other", regarding if hiring former residents/fellows benefits the field of spine surgery. "Other" answers endorsing in-house hiring most commonly mentioned consistency/stability (28.6%) while those opposed most commonly mentioned lack of diversity of training/novel techniques (42.9%). When considering programmatic size, while the stated perception of FDs regarding in-house hiring at larger (>2 fellows) versus smaller (1 to 2 fellows) programs was equivalent, the mean percentage of in-house hires at larger programs (67.8% ± 35.8%) was significantly greater than that of smaller programs (33.3% ± 44.8%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In-house hiring in spine surgery appears to occur more commonly than perceived by program leadership, particularly at larger fellowship programs. Further study of hiring preferences and their impact on the field of spine surgery is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Survey Study.

Ultrasound Measurements of the Median Nerve at the Distal Wrist Crease Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Studies.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment neuropathy and is commonly evaluated using electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs). Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a potentially easier and more comfortable alternative to EDSs. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve via US correlate with the severity rating of CTS based on EDSs. Methods: A retrospective review of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent US and EDSs of the median nerve for CTS was performed. Sensory nerve action potential, distal motor latency, and compound muscle action potential were measured, and severity was graded on American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine guidelines. Cross-sectional area of the median nerve was measured via US at the wrist crease. Results: There was a significant association between increasing CSA and increasing EDS severity (P < .0001). The mean CSA for normal, mild, moderate, and severe CTS was 7.48 ± 2.00, 10.36 ± 2.53, 12.01 ± 3.64, and 14.34 ± 4.77 mm2, respectively. The area under the curve demonstrated the ability of median nerve CSA to discriminate between normal and abnormal EDSs with an optimal cutoff CSA of ≥10 mm2, as well as, the ability to discriminate between mild CTS and moderate to severe CTS at a cutoff CSA of greater than or equal to 12 mm2. Conclusions: The results of this study show that US measurements of the median nerve at the distal wrist crease discriminate between normal and abnormal EDSs, and between mild CTS and moderate to severe CTS.

Factors Impacting Recurrence Rate After Open Ganglion Cyst Excision.

Background: The recurrence rate after open excision of ganglion cysts is approximately 20%. However, this literature is based on a small series of subjects. This study aims to determine the rate and risk of recurrence after open excision of ganglion cysts in a large patient series. Methods: This study included 628 patients who had ganglion cyst excision from 2010 to 2018. A retrospective chart review recorded the following: age, sex, laterality, volar/dorsal location, and recurrence. An overall recurrence rate was calculated. In addition, a 1-way analysis of variance test was used to compare recurrence rates among the individual surgeons, and unpaired t tests were used to compare age of recurrence, dorsal cyst recurrence, laterality of cyst, and recurrence based on sex. Finally, a comparison of recurrence rate over time was conducted for surgeon 3. Results: The overall recurrence rate was 3.8% (24 of 628). The recurrence rates for each surgeon were 3% (9 of 353), 2% (3 of 167), and 11% (12 of 107), P = .02. The age of those with and without a recurrence did not differ (32 years vs 38 years), P = .06. The recurrence rate of dorsal ganglion cysts was 4.1% (14 of 341) compared with 3.5% (10 of 286) for volar ganglion cysts, P = .69. Male patients had a recurrence in 6.4% (13 of 204) of cases compared with 2.6% (11 of 424) of female patients, P = 0.01. There was a decrease in the rate of recurrence from 42.9% to 5.3% over 5 years for surgeon 3. Conclusion: In our sample, male sex and surgeon experience were significant risk factors in ganglion cyst recurrence.