Acute hospital care: how much activity is attributable to caring for patients with dementia?

BACKGROUND: People with dementia are among the most frequent service users in the acute hospital. Despite this, the acute hospital is not organized in a manner that best addresses their needs. METHODS: We examined acute dementia care over a 3-year period from 2010 to 2012 in a 600-bed university hospital, to clarify the service activity and costs attributable to acute dementia care. RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty-nine patients with dementia were admitted during the study period, accounting for 1433/69 718 (2%) of all inpatient episodes, comprising 44 449/454 169 (10%) of total bed days. The average length of stay was 31.0 days in the dementia group and 14.1 days in those >65 years without dementia. The average hospital care cost was almost three times more (€13 832) per patient with dementia, compared with (€5404) non-dementia patients, accounting for 5% (almost €20 000 000) of the total hospital casemix budget for the period. DISCUSSION: Service activity attributable to dementia care in the acute hospital is considerable. Moreover, given the fact that a significant minority of cognitive impairment goes unrecognized after acute admissions, it is likely that this is under-representative of the full impact of dementia in acute care. Although the money currently being spent on acute dementia care is considerable, it is being used to provide a service that does not meet its user needs adequately. It is clear that acute hospitals need to provide a more 'dementia friendly' service for acutely unwell older persons.

Does admission via an acute medical unit influence hospital mortality? 12 years' experience in a large Dublin hospital.

BACKGROUND: Following an emergency medical admission, patients may be admitted an acute medical assessment unit (AMAU) or directly into a ward. An AMAU provides a structured environment for their initial assessment and treatment. METHODS: All emergency admissions (66,933 episodes in 36,271 patients) to an Irish hospital over an 12-year period (2002-2013) were studied with 30-day in-hospital mortality as the outcome measure. Univariate Odds Ratios, by initial patient allocation, and the fully adjusted Odds Ratios were calculated, using a validated logistic regression model. RESULTS: Patients, by design, were intended to be admitted initially to the AMAU (<= 5 day stay). Capacity constraints dictated that only 39.8% of patients were so admitted; the remainder bypassed the AMAU to a ward (60.2%). All patients remained under the care of the admitting consultant/team. We computed the risk profile for each group, using a multiple variable validated model of 30-day in-hospital mortality; the model indicated the same risk profile between these groups. The univariate OR of an in-hospital death by day 30 for a patient initially allocated to the AMAU, compared with an initial ward allocation was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.82- p<0.001). The fully adjusted risk for patients was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.73- p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients, with equivalent mortality risk, allocated initially to AMAU or a more traditional ward, appeared to have substantially different outcomes.