Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review.

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for each surgical step of the minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) for non-locally advanced colon cancer, to define the most optimal procedure with the highest level of evidence. Background: High variability exists in the way MIRH is performed between surgeons and hospitals, which could affect patients' postoperative and oncological outcomes. Methods: A systematic search using PubMed was performed to first identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if there were none then landmark papers and consensus statements were systematically searched for each key step of MIRH. Systematic reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, and selection was based on highest quality followed by year of publication. Results: Low (less than 12 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) gives higher mean quality of recovery compared to standard IAP. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is associated with lowest recurrence and highest 5-year overall survival rates, without worsening short-term outcomes. Routine D3 versus D2 lymphadenectomy showed higher LN yield, but more vascular injuries, and no difference in overall and disease-free survival. Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with better intra- and postoperative outcomes. The Pfannenstiel incision gives the lowest chance of incisional hernias compared to all other extraction sites. Conclusion: According to the best available evidence, the most optimal MIRH for colon cancer without clinically involved D3 nodes entails at least low IAP, CME with D2 lymphadenectomy, an intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision.

National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with right-sided colon cancer. This operation has evolved during recent decades, with many innovations and improvements but this has also resulted in high variability of uptake with subsequent substantial variableness. The aim of this ongoing study is to identify current surgical variations, determine the most optimal and standardised MIRH and nationally train and implement that technique to improve short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS: The Right study is a national multicentre prospective interventional sequential cohort study. Firstly, current local practice was evaluated. Subsequently, a standardised surgical technique for right-sided colon cancer was determined using the Delphi consensus method, and this procedure was trained during hands-on courses. The standardised MIRH will be implemented with proctoring (implementation cohort), after which the performance will be monitored (consolidation cohort). Patients who will receive a minimally invasive (extended) right hemicolectomy for cT1-3N0-2M0 colon cancer will be included. The primary outcome is patient safety reflected in the 90-day overall complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes will include intraoperative complications, 90-day mortality rate, number of resected tumour-positive lymph nodes, completeness of mesocolic excision, surgical quality score, locoregional and distant recurrence and 5-year overall survival. A total number of 1095 patients (365 per cohort) will be included. DISCUSSION: The Right study is designed to safely implement the best surgical practice concerning patients with right-sided colon cancer aiming to standardise and improve the surgical quality of MIRH at a national level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889456, May 2021.

Small bowel obstruction caused by 18FDG-negative ileocecal metastasis of lobular breast carcinoma.

Breast carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. In up to 30%, distant metastases will occur; however, ileocecal metastases are rare. Although there have been cases reported that demonstrate ileocecal metastases of breast carcinoma, PET/CT-negative cases have never been described. We present a patient with a small bowel obstruction, preoperatively complicated by pulmonary embolisms. The patient underwent placement of an inferior vena cava filter followed by hemicolectomy. Pathological examination revealed ileocecal lobular breast carcinoma metastases and adjacent peritoneal carcinomatosis, which had shown no intestinal 18FDG uptake 7 weeks prior to presentation. Subsequently, symptoms of metastases and the paraneoplastic syndrome progressed, and the patient was referred to the medical oncologist for palliative therapy. Although uncommon, physicians should be aware of potential presence of 18FDG-negative gastrointestinal metastases of breast cancer.

Diagnostic value of computed tomography for detecting anastomotic or staple line leakage after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postbariatric anastomotic or staple line leakage (ASLL) is a dreaded complication with an incidence up to 1.6% and a leak-associated mortality of 5.0% to 16.7%. Feared low sensitivity of abdominal computed tomography (CT) for detecting ASLL is causing surgeons to omit CT and directly perform a diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected ASLL. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of CT in case of suspected ASLL after bariatric procedures and to identify reliable CT characteristics predicting the presence of ASLL. SETTING: A large teaching hospital and bariatric center of excellence. METHODS: All CT scans performed for suspected ASLL after bariatric surgery in the period November 2007 until August 2016 were independently reevaluated by abdominal radiologists. The diagnostic value of CT by means of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value was analyzed comparing results of reevaluation to a standard of reference. Multivariable regression was performed to identify reliable CT characteristics for the presence of ASLL. RESULTS: A total of 66 CT scans were performed because of suspected leakage. Reevaluation of CT scans revealed a sensitivity of 89% to 100%, a specificity of 69% to 78%, a positive predictive value of 39% to 50%, and a negative predictive value of 97% to 100% of CT for detecting ASLL after bariatric surgery. Multivariable logistic regression of ASLL characteristics on CT revealed 'air near the anastomosis/staple line' as the only independent predictor for the presence of ASLL. CONCLUSION: With a sensitivity of 89% to 100% and negative predictive value of 97% to 100%, a negative CT can rule out ASLL in patients with a lower suspicion of ASLL.

Trocar port scar quality in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction of scar quality and their influence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have never been investigated in morbidly obese patients. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were (1) to assess scar quality 1 year post laparoscopic bariatric surgery by means of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and (2) to examine the influence of patients' perception of scar quality on patients' HRQoL. SETTING: A large Bariatric Center of Excellence in the Netherlands. METHODS: This was a descriptive pilot study of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic bariatric surgery. One year after surgery, patients and 2 observers completed the POSAS. HRQoL was assessed by using the RAND-36. Agreement of POSAS scores between patients and observers was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficient. Correlations between POSAS scores and HRQoL scores were calculated with Spearman's rho. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included. Patients scored their scar quality worse than observers (21 versus 15-16), particularly on visual parameters (4-5 versus 2-3). Patients and observers showed poor agreement on all POSAS items (intraclass correlation coefficient = .16-.32). No significant correlations were detected between POSAS and HRQoL scores. CONCLUSION: While patient scar quality satisfaction was relatively low after bariatric surgery, these outcomes were not correlated with HRQoL. Bariatric surgeons should be aware that patients could have a different view on scar quality compared with them. This realization is important to manage patient expectations regarding scar quality after bariatric surgery. Effective communication may improve patient satisfaction as an outcome.

Patients' preferences for information in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: The decision to undergo bariatric surgery is multifactorial and made both by patient and doctor. Information is of the utmost importance for this decision. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the bariatric surgery patient's preferences regarding information provision in bariatric surgery. SETTING: A teaching hospital, bariatric center of excellence in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between September 2013 and September 2014 were approached by mail to participate. A questionnaire was used to elicit patient preferences for the content and format of information. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinicopathologic factors, and psychologic factors were explored as predictors for specific preferences. RESULTS: Of the 356 eligible patients, 112 (31.5%) participated. The mean age was 49.2 (±10.7) years, and 91 (81.3%) patients were female. Patients deemed the opportunity to ask questions (96.4%) the most important feature of the consult, followed by a realistic view on expectations-for example, results of the procedure (95.5%) and information concerning the consequences of surgery for daily life (89.1%). Information about the risk of complications on the order of 10% was desired by 93% of patients; 48% desired information about lower risks (.1%). Only 25 patients (22.3%) desired detailed information concerning their weight loss after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bariatric patients wished for information about the consequences of surgery on daily life, whereas the importance of information concerning complications decreased when their incidence lessened.

Influence of continuous positive airway pressure on postoperative leakage in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects two third of morbidly obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. Perioperative usage of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is advised for moderately and severe OSA to avoid respiratory failure and cardiac events. CPAP increases the air pressure in the upper airway, but also may elevate the air pressure in the esophagus and stomach. Concern exists that this predisposes to mechanical stress resulting in suture or staple line disruption (further referred to as suture line disruption). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether perioperative CPAP usage is associated with an increased risk of suture line disruption after bariatric surgery. SETTING: Obesity Center Amsterdam, OLVG-west, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: All patients who underwent bariatric surgery including a suture line were eligible for inclusion. Only patients with information regarding OSA severity as defined by the apnea-hypopnea-index and postoperative CPAP usage were included. RESULTS: From November 2007 to August 2016, postoperative CPAP status was documented in 2135 patients: 497 (23.3%) used CPAP postoperatively, whereas 1638 (76.7%) used no CPAP. Mean body mass index was 44.1 kg/m2 (standard deviation 6.6). Suture line disruption occurred in 25 patients (1.2%). The leakage rate was not associated with CPAP usage (8 [1.6%] in CPAP group versus 17 [1%] in non-CPAP group, P = .300). CPAP was no risk factor for suture line disruption in multivariable analysis as well. CONCLUSION: Postoperative CPAP does not appear to increase the risk of suture line disruption in bariatric surgery. CPAP is recommended in all patients with moderate or severe OSA who undergo bariatric surgery.

Perioperative management of obstructive sleep apnea in bariatric surgery: a consensus guideline.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasing worldwide, with over 500,000 cases performed every year. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is present in 35%-94% of MBS patients. Nevertheless, consensus regarding the perioperative management of OSA in MBS patients is not established. OBJECTIVES: To provide consensus based guidelines utilizing current literature and, when in the absence of supporting clinical data, expert opinion by organizing a consensus meeting of experts from relevant specialties. SETTING: The meeting was held in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: A panel of 15 international experts identified 75 questions covering preoperative screening, treatment, postoperative monitoring, anesthetic care and follow-up. Six researchers reviewed the literature systematically. During this meeting, the "Amsterdam Delphi Method" was utilized including controlled acquisition of feedback, aggregation of responses and iteration. RESULTS: Recommendations or statements were provided for 58 questions. In the judgment of the experts, 17 questions provided no additional useful information and it was agreed to exclude them. With the exception of 3 recommendations (64%, 66%, and 66% respectively), consensus (>70%) was reached for 55 statements and recommendations. Several highlights: polysomnography is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA; continuous positive airway pressure is recommended for all patients with moderate and severe OSA; OSA patients should be continuously monitored with pulse oximetry in the early postoperative period; perioperative usage of sedatives and opioids should be minimized. CONCLUSION: This first international expert meeting provided 58 statements and recommendations for a clinical consensus guideline regarding the perioperative management of OSA patients undergoing MBS.

Unexplained abdominal pain in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is an overall complication rate of 6.3%-10% after bariatric surgery. After ruling out anatomic/physical causes, there is a substantial group of patients who develop unexplained postsurgical abdominal pain. OBJECTIVES: To inventory the prevalence of unexplained abdominal pain after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and to determine predictive factors for unexplained abdominal pain. SETTING: Obesity Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: A retrospective study in a prospective database was performed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative course were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1788 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between November 2007 and April 2015. The average follow-up consisted of 33.5 months, without loss to follow-up. Abdominal pain was presented in 387 patients (21.6%). The study population consisted of 337 women (87.1%) and 50 men (12.9%); the mean age was 43.3 years (standard deviation 10.1) and the median preoperative body mass index was 43.7 kg/m². An explanation for abdominal pain was found in 246 of 387 patients (63.6%), whereas no explanation was found in 133 patients (34.4%). Revisional surgery was a significant predictor for unexplained pain (odds ratio 1.7; confidence interval 1.0-2.8; P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: A total of 133 patients (7.4%) experienced unexplained abdominal pain after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Revisional surgery was found to be a significant predictive factor for this outcome. Present study results suggest that postoperative unexplained abdominal pain is a significant morbidity and should be part of the informed consent. More research is needed regarding further diagnosis and management and treatment.

Predicting postoperative complications after bariatric surgery: the Bariatric Surgery Index for Complications, BASIC.

BACKGROUND: Around 20% of bariatric surgery patients develop a short- or long-term complication. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to develop a risk model predicting complications: the Bariatric Surgery Index for Complications (BASIC). SETTING: The Obesity Center Amsterdam, located in a large teaching hospital, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS: A prospective consecutive database including patients operated between November 2007 and February 2015 was used. For the BASIC, analysis according to the TRIPOD statement was performed to identify risk factors for complications. Class I included patients with zero to one risk factor, class II patients with two risk factors, and class III patients with three or more risk factors. RESULTS: Of 1709 analyzed patients, mean age was 45 years (±SD 10.7), 1393 (81.5%) were female; mean body mass index was 44.5 kg/m2 (6.8). Overall, 271 (15.9%) patients developed a complication of which 197 (72.5%) occurred within 30 days. Predictors in multivariable analysis were use of anticoagulants (odd's ratio (OR) 1.5); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.3); dyslipidemia (OR 1.4); gender (OR 1.4); psychiatric history (OR 1.3); and revisional surgery (OR 1.5). In class I, 13.5% (181 out of 1338) experienced complications, in class II 58 (21.6%) of the 269 patients and in class III 32 (31.4%) of the 102 patients, respectively. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in both overall and 30 day complications. CONCLUSION: The BASIC uses six preoperative variables to classify patients in a low-, intermediate-, or high-risk group for postoperative complications after bariatric surgery.

Value of routine polysomnography in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), present in 60-70 % of bariatric surgery patients, is a potentially life-threatening condition when not detected and managed appropriately. The best available method to identify the severity of OSA is polysomnography. However, routine polysomnography measurements have not been accepted as standard modality in bariatric surgery. We report our experience with routine polysomnography in a cohort of patients undergoing bariatric surgery to determine the true prevalence of OSA with respect to the different severity levels as determined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). METHODS: AHI data were retrospectively collected from all patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2012 onward, when the performance of preoperative polysomnography became mandatory. Mild, moderate and severe OSA were defined as an AHI ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30/h, respectively. Prevalence and number needed to screen (NNS) were calculated for all OSA severity levels. RESULTS: A total of 1358 patients were included. OSA was detected in 813 (59.9 %; NNS: 2) patients. Moreover, 405 (29.8 %; NNS: 4) patients were diagnosed with an AHI ≥15/h and 213 (15.7 %; NNS: 7) with severe OSA (AHI ≥30/h). Extreme AHI thresholds of ≥60 and ≥90/h were detected in 79 (5.8 %; NNS: 18) and 17 (1.3 %; NNS: 77) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: One-third of the bariatric surgery patients have an AHI ≥15/h and would benefit from continuous positive airway pressure therapy. In order to increase perioperative safety and avoid the preventable risk of perioperative complications, we recommend mandatory P(S)G prior to bariatric surgery.

Evaluation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score for the prediction of postoperative complications after primary and revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: The Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) is a validated instrument for mortality risk prediction in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures classifying patients into low risk (class A), intermediate risk (class B), and high risk (class C). OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the OS-MRS in predicting postoperative complications after LRYGB. Secondarily, the postoperative complication rate between primary and revisional LRYGB was systematically analyzed. SETTING: The Obesity Center Amsterdam, located in a large teaching hospital, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS: The OS-MRS was applied to a consecutive database of patients who underwent LRYGB from November 2007 onwards. Postoperative complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Revisional LRYGB was separately analyzed. RESULTS: LRYGB was performed in 1667 patients either as a primary (81.5%) or revisional (18.5%) procedure. The majority (n = 1371, 82.2%) were female, mean age 44.6 (standard deviation 14.4) years and mean body mass index 44.2 (6.5) kg/m2. Nine hundred and four (54.2%) were OS-MRS class A, 642 class B (38.5%), and 121 (7.3%) class C. Complications occurred in 143 (10.5%) and 44 (14.2%) patients after primary and revisional surgery, respectively. In both primary and revisional LRYGB, there was no association between complications and the OS-MRS classification. Subanalysis comparing primary with revisional LRYGB found a significant association between revisional surgery and the development of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo≥3) (P = .003) and mortality (P = .017). CONCLUSION: The OS-MRS was not an accurate predictor for postoperative complications in patients who underwent primary or revisional LRYGB. As in other studies, revisional surgery is an independent risk factor for the development of severe complications.

Persistent moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: which patients?

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might decide to undergo bariatric surgery to improve this disease or, more specifically, to become independent of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, which is generally indicated in case of moderate and severe OSA. Knowledge of this topic is important for patient education on expectations of surgical outcome. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and phenotypes of patients with persistent moderate to severe OSA after bariatric surgery. SETTING: Obesity Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients who underwent a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, had a preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥15/hr, and of whom a follow-up AHI/hr was available were included. RESULTS: Out of 437 patients, 205 underwent pre- and postoperative polysomnography; 232 (53.1%) were lost to follow-up. Median AHI was 32.3/hr (range, 15-138) and mean body mass index was 46 (standard deviation 7.2) kg/m2. A postoperative AHI<15/hr was achieved in 152 patients (74.1%), whereas 53 (25.9%) still had moderate or severe disease 8.6 (standard deviation 4.8) months postoperatively. Predictive factors for persistent moderate to severe disease were age≥50 years, preoperative AHI≥30/hr, excess weight loss (EWL)<60%, and hypertension (area under the curve: .772). CONCLUSION: After bariatric surgery, around three quarters of the moderate to severe OSA patients had no or mild OSA, whereas one quarter (25.9%) still had moderate to severe OSA. Age≥50 years, preoperative AHI≥30/hr, EWL<60%, and hypertension were predictive factors for this persistent postoperative AHI≥15/hr.

Is fear for postoperative cardiopulmonary complications after bariatric surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnea justified? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on postoperative cardiopulmonary complications in bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane central register databases were searched. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used for reviewing. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included (n = 98,935). OSA was documented in 36,368 (37%) patients. The cardiopulmonary complication rate varied between .0% and 25.8%; no clear association with OSA was found (rate .0% to 18%), possibly because of optimized situations such as continuous positive airway pressure. OSA appeared to be no independent risk factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, death, or longer length of stay in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, presented data showed no clear association of OSA with cardiopulmonary morbidity, ICU admissions, mortality, and length of stay after bariatric surgery. Although this questions the justification of admitting OSA patients to the ICU, future studies are required investigating the effect of monitoring strategies and optimizing treatments including continuous positive airway pressure use.

Predictive Factors for Insufficient Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea Influence Weight Loss?

BACKGROUND: Important endpoints of bariatric surgery are weight loss and improvement of comorbidities, of which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the highest accompanying comorbidity (70%). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of OSA on weight loss after bariatric surgery and to provide predictive factors for insufficient weight loss (defined as ≤50% excess weight loss (EWL)) at 1 year follow-up. METHODS: All consecutive patients, who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with data on preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pre- and postoperative body mass index (BMI) were included. After surgery, the percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) and BMI changes were compared between preoperatively diagnosed OSA-, subdivided in mild, moderate, and severe OSA, and non-OSA patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated predictive factors for ≤50% EWL. RESULTS: A total of 816 patients, 522 (64%) with and 294 (36%) without OSA, were included. After 1 year, OSA patients achieved less %EWL than non-OSA patients (65.5 SD 20.7 versus 70.3 SD 21.0; p < 0.01). The lowest %EWL was seen in severe OSA patients (61.7 SD 20.2). However, when adjusted for waist circumference, BMI, and age, no effect of OSA was seen on %EWL or changes in BMI. Although AHI, gender, age, BMI, type of surgery, and type II diabetes were predictive factors for ≤50% EWL (area under the curve 0.778), the AHI as variable was of little importance. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of OSA does not individually impair weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Routine Postoperative Monitoring after Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients with Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: ICU Admission is not Necessary.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs in 70-80% of bariatric surgery patients. Patients with severe OSA (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) >30/h) are postoperatively admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for continuous monitoring, to prevent complications. The aim of this study was to assess the necessity of routine postoperative monitoring at an ICU of severe OSA patients after bariatric surgery, attempting to prevent and detect cardiorespiratory complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery from November 2010 to July 2013 were entered into a database. Minimal follow-up was 1 month. Poly(somno)graphy (P(S)G) was routinely performed. Patients with severe OSA were admitted to the ICU for the first postoperative night. Oxygen saturation was continuously measured. The database was reviewed regarding patient characteristics, CPAP use, re-intubations, desaturations (saturation <90% and severe <85%), and complications. RESULTS: Severe OSA was present in 151 of the 794 patients, and all 151 were admitted to the ICU. Thirty who underwent revisional surgery were excluded. Forty-seven percent was male, median age was 51 years (27.0-68.0), and median body mass index (BMI) was 46.6 (kg/m(2)) (34.0-77.6). No deaths, re-intubations, or cardiopulmonary complications occurred. Eighty-two (67.8%) patients used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Twenty-one (17.4%) patients experienced desaturations with a median of 2.0 (1-8). Six patients (5.0%) had one episode of severe desaturation. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe OSA and adequate CPAP use are at low risk of cardiopulmonary complications after (laparoscopic) bariatric surgery. Routine admission to an ICU might be superfluous. However, continuous digital oximetry remains essential.

Trocar Port Hernias After Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is increasingly being performed worldwide. It is estimated that trocar port hernias occur more often in obese patients due to their obesity and because the ports are not closed routinely. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and management of patients with trocar port hernias after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: All patients who were operated between 2006 and 2013 were included. During the study period, the trocar ports were not closed routinely. All patients who had any symptomatic abdominal wall hernia during follow-up were included. RESULTS: Overall, 1524 laparoscopic bariatric procedures were performed. There were 1249 female (82 %) and 275 male (18 %) patients. The mean age was 44 years, and median body mass index was 43 kg/m(2). Patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) (n = 859), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) (n = 364), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (n = 68), revisional surgery (n = 226), and other procedures (n = 7). Three hundred and one patients (20 %) had one or more postoperative complications and the overall mortality was 0.3 % (four patients). There were 14 patients (0.9 %) with an abdominal wall hernia, of which eight (0.5 %) had a trocar port hernia, three (0.2 %) an incisional hernia from other previous surgery, and three (0.2 %) an umbilical hernia. Gender, age, BMI, smoking, type II diabetes, procedure type, complications, and weight loss were not associated with the occurrence of abdominal wall hernias. CONCLUSIONS: Trocar port hernias after bariatric surgery occur seldom if the trocar port is not routinely closed.

The influence of prophylactic proton pump inhibitor treatment on the development of symptomatic marginal ulceration in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients: a historic cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Marginal ulceration at the gastrojejunostomy is a serious complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) and occurs in 1%-16% of patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might lower the occurrence of these ulcers. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 6 months prophylactic usage of PPIs on the development of marginal ulceration and compare this with a historic patient control group. SETTING: A single institution cohort at a bariatric center of excellence, The Sint Lucas Andreas Zienkenhuis, Amsterdam METHODS: A consecutive database of patients who underwent LRYGB from November 2007 to September 2012 in a single institution was retrospectively reviewed. From August 2011, patients received a standard dose of pantozol 40 mg once daily directly postoperatively for 6 months. No standard PPI prophylaxis was administered before August 2011, and the patients not using PPIs in this historic cohort served as the control group. RESULTS: A total of 610 patients underwent LRYGB, of which 128 patients (21.0%) underwent revisional surgery. Postoperative PPIs were administered in the intervention group of 337 patients, compared with the historic control group consisting of 273 patients. Six patients (1.2%) who received postoperative PPIs versus 20 patients (7.3 %) in the historic control group developed marginal ulceration (P = .001). Patients using proton pump inhibitors developed fewer gastrointestinal complaints postoperatively (P< .001). CONCLUSIONS: Routine usage of PPIs reduced the occurrence of marginal ulceration after LRYGB.