RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival. METHODS: 4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/uso terapéutico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Androstadienos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Posmenopausia , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of anthracyclines has been extensively studied in adjuvant chemotherapy, but much less in the primary chemotherapy of early breast carcinoma. This study, comparing CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) with the rotational anthracycline-containing regimen CMFEV (CMF plus epirubicin and vincristine) administered as primary chemotherapy, demonstrated a significant increase in clinical complete response in premenopausal women. We report the long-term results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients with stage I or II palpable breast carcinoma and a tumour diameter of >2.5 cm were randomised to receive CMF or CMFEV for four cycles before surgery. After surgery, the patients in both arms received adjuvant CMF for three cycles. RESULTS: In the study population as a whole, there was a non-significant 20% reduction in mortality and relapse rates in the CMFEV arm. However, the effect of the experimental regimen was only found in premenopausal patients, especially in terms of relapse-free survival (P=0.07) and locoregional relapse-free survival (P=0.0009), thus mirroring the effect on response rates. After 10 years, the proportions of premenopausal patients free from locoregional relapse as a first event in the CMF and CMFEV groups were 68% and 97%, respectively. No relevant differences were found in postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSION: The overall results of this study showed that the greater activity of the experimental anthracycline-containing combination over CMF as primary chemotherapy in premenopausal patients translated into long-term effects in the same subgroup.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured. CONCLUSIONS: PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Epirrubicina/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Probabilidad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This study aimed to verify whether the advantage in terms of response rate and survival of dacarbazine plus tamoxifen over dacarbazine alone in metastatic malignant melanoma reported in a previous randomized trial was due to a specific interaction of dacarbazine with tamoxifen. A total of 125 patients with locoregional or disseminated malignant melanoma were randomized to receive dacarbazine (250 mg/m(2) days 1-5 every 3 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm A) or vindesine (3 mg/m(2) every week for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm B). Of the 125 randomized patients, 57 and 59 were evaluable in arm A and B, respectively. The complete response rates were the same (2% versus 2%) and the complete plus partial response rates were similar (11% versus 14%) in the two groups. There was no significant difference in survival. Neither response or survival correlated with gender. In conclusion, when combined with tamoxifen, dacarbazine does not have a specific effect on response or survival compared with vindesine. The lower response rate to dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (11%) than that reported in the previous trial (28%) might be explained by actual differences in patient and/or participating centre accrual characteristics in the presence of apparently identical eligibility criteria.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vindesina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
We compared a relatively short regimen of monochemotherapy with epirubicin versus polychemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant treatment for stage I and II breast cancer patients. 348 patients with oestrogen receptor negative (ER-) node negative and ER- or ER+ node-positive with <10 nodes were accrued. CMF was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks, for six courses; epirubicin was given weekly for 4 months. Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen for 3 years. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Outcome evaluation was performed both in eligible patients and in all randomised patients according to the intention-to-treat principle. 8 randomised patients were considered ineligible. At a median follow-up of 8 years, there was no difference in OS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77-1.61, P=0.58), EFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, P=0.48), and RFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.8-1.64, P=0.48) between the two arms for all of the patients. At 8 years, the RFS percentages (+/-Standard Error (S.E.)) were 65.4% (+/-4%) in the CMF arm and 62.7% (+/-4%) in the epirubicin arm; for EFS these were 64.2% (+/-4%) for CMF and 60.8% (+/-4%) for epirubicin, respectively. A significant difference in RFS (P=0.015) was observed in patients with 4-9 positive nodes in favour of the CMF arm. Toxicity in the two arms was superimposable except for more frequent grade 3 alopecia in the epirubicin-treated patients (P=0.001). Overall, at a median follow-up of 8 years, there were no differences between the two arms in terms of OS, EFS and RFS.
Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , LetrozolRESUMEN
A number of biological and predictive markers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been sought, but these have so far been mainly evaluated on surgically resected specimens. Given that fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is being increasingly used in the diagnosis of NSCLC, its application could be extended to the immunocytochemical detection of biological parameters at the time of diagnosis before surgery. In order to assess the reliability of estimating biological markers on fine needle aspirates (FNAs) from NSCLC, the aim of this study was to compare Ki67 growth fraction, p53 and bcl-2 protein expression as revealed by the immuncytochemical assessment of FNAs obtained from surgical samples with the immunohistochemical results obtained from the corresponding histological sections. FNAs were performed on surgical specimens obtained from 29 NSCLC patients. Ki67, p53 and bcl-2 were cytologically and histologically evaluable in respectively 25, 27 and 19 cases. Concordance between FNAs and corresponding paraffin sections was 84% for Ki67, 93% for p53 and 95% for bcl-2. All of the specimens whose biological parameters were studied by immunocytohistochemistry also underwent flow cytometric DNA analysis of FNAs taken from fresh surgical specimens. Of the 29 cases, 22 were aneuploid and seven diploid. The S-phase fraction (SPF) was evaluable in 62% of cases. Comparison of SPF results on FNAs with Ki67 values evaluated on the corresponding histologic and cytologic specimens, revealed a significant correlation only with histology. Good reproducibility was also found in relation to the immunocytochemical results obtained on FNAs from different areas of the same tumour, showing that tumour heterogeneity does not affect the method. The concordance between the immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical results suggests that FNAB may be a reliable procedure for the biological characterization of NSCLC. Given its limited invasiveness, FNAB could be used in vivo for the preoperative assessment of biological parameters in patients with operable or metastatic NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Biopsia con Aguja , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/metabolismo , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine (VI) and paclitaxel (TA) are among the most active single agents in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma, and both have microtubules as their cytotoxic target. This Phase I-II study combined these 2 agents and used a 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion of paclitaxel to maximize their cytotoxic activities. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who were previously treated with chemotherapy were administered increasing doses of a 96-hour paclitaxel i.v. infusion from Days 1 to 5, with a first fixed dose of vinorelbine (12.5 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 5) every 3 weeks. The dose of paclitaxel was then decreased starting from the previously established tolerated dose, and a second fixed dose of vinorelbine (15 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 5) was given. This identified 2 acceptable doses of paclitaxel (110 mg/m(2) with VI 12.5 mg/m(2) and 90 mg/m(2) with VI 15 mg/m(2)). The latter was used in the subsequent Phase II study. RESULTS: For the 50 patients treated with any dose, the complete response (CR) and the CR plus partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 14% and 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-67%). When only the 27 patients treated with the Phase II dose were considered, the figures were, respectively, 11% and 52% (95% CI, 42-62%). The median time to progression was 26 weeks, and the median survival 51 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: At the dose schedule identified for the Phase II study, the VI-TA-96 combination has considerable antitumor activity; pharmacoeconomic interest (it requires about half the doses of the agents administered singly); no major toxicity, except G4 neutropenia; and no need for premedication. This combination may be recommended as one of the most effective therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who were pretreated mainly with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Economía Farmacéutica , Femenino , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/efectos adversos , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , VinorelbinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is a well-documented procedure for the diagnosis and biologic characterization of breast carcinoma. In order to compare the immunocytochemical expression of biologic parameters on cytology and on histology, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status, p53 protein expression, and Ki67 growth fraction were evaluated on presurgical fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) from breast carcinoma patients and on the corresponding surgical samples prior to any systemic therapy. METHODS: FNAs were performed on 104 patients with primary breast carcinoma at the time of diagnosis and subjected to immunocytochemical evaluation of ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67. The same parameters were immunohistochemically evaluated on the corresponding paraffin embedded sections. RESULTS: ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67 were evaluable on FNAs and on paired tissue sections in 100, 97, 68, and 84 cases, respectively. Concordance between cytology and histology was 89% for ER, 78% for PgR, 79% for p53, and 70% for Ki67. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between the results of immunocytochemical evaluation of ER, PgR, p53, and Ki67, on both cytology and histology, underscores the reliability of the biologic characterization of breast carcinoma by FNAB. This approach could be particularly useful in predicting prognosis and response to treatment in patients who are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Inmunohistoquímica , Biomarcadores/análisis , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
In a retrospective analysis of a series of clinical trials by Levin and Hryniuk in 1987, the average relative dose intensity of first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer correlated significantly with clinical response and survival, and cisplatin was the only drug for which the outcome correlated with the individual drug relative dose intensity. There was a need to test whether and to what extent this evidence would be confirmed in a prospective evaluation. In this study 101 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma were randomized to receive the same total dose of cisplatin but at the conventional 3-weekly schedule (CTWS) (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for six cycles) (51 patients) or at an experimental accelerated weekly schedule (AWS) (100 mg/m2 every week for two triplets of three cycles separated by a 5-week interval) (50 patients). To benefit from a multidrug regimen at the same extent, patients in both arms sequentially received four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The median follow-up period of this study is 9.7 years. In 42 and 40 patients of the two arms having evaluable response, the clinical complete response rates to cisplatin were 14% and 22% and the complete plus partial response rates were 48% and 55% in the CTWS and in the AWS arm, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. However, the survival curves were similar during the first 2 years but clearly diverged thereafter in favor of the AWS arm (p = 0.07). At 5 years, 12% and 30% of the patients were still alive in the CTWS and in the AWS arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was not relevant in either arm of the study. Nonhematologic toxicity, especially ototoxicity, was substantial and significantly higher in the AWS arm. Although statistically nonsignificant, this AWS regimen of cisplatin is associated with long-term better survival compared to the CTWS regimen in advanced ovarian carcinoma. This accelerated approach administering cisplatin should be further investigated, especially in patients with low residual disease after primary surgery.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research tested two experimental chemotherapy strategies in an attempt to improve the results achievable with conventional chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomly allocated as follows: (a) to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimen (CMF); (b) to a rotational crossing program (ROT-CROSS); or (c) to a sequential intensification program (SEQ-INT). The same single agents (C, M, F, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin) were administered in both experimental arms, but following a different policy. The SEQ-INT program induced a significantly higher complete response (32% vs. 6%, p = 0.0006) and objective response rate (72% vs. 42%, p = 0.0047) than CMF did. There were no differences in survival between CMF and either experimental arm. A number of side effects were significantly more with both experimental chemotherapies than with CMF, but the treatments were generally tolerable. Although some caution is required when interpreting a significant advantage found between an entire chemotherapeutic strategy and a single conventional combination, this study documents the potential therapeutic advantage of administering different sequential chemotherapies, and changing each at the time of maximum result without waiting for a progression. The impressive cytoreductive effects achievable with this policy (SEQ-INT) in metastatic disease merit further investigation in the adjuvant setting.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We designed three new four-drug cisplatin-containing combinations and evaluated their activity in a randomized phase II study including patients with locally advanced (stage III) and locally recurrent breast carcinoma. All combinations included methotrexate (M) on day 1 and cisplatin (P) on day 2 (MVAC-like combinations) and differed from one another by the addition of Epirubicin (Epi), Vincristine (V), Etoposide (E), Mitomycin (Mi). Based on the administered agents, they were named MPEMi, MPEpiE, MPEpiV. The combinations were randomly assigned to 101 patients, 57 with locally advanced and 44 with locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Response was evaluated after 4 cycles. The complete response (CR) rates were 7% and 43% and the CR plus partial response (PR) rates were 84% and 89% in locally advanced and in locally recurrent disease, respectively. In locally advanced disease, a pathologic CR (pCR) was assessed in seven of 57 patients (12%). There were no significant differences among the three combinations. The toxicities were at times severe, but generally tolerable, as demonstrated by the high cumulative doses of the drugs received by the patients. In conclusion, these three innovative chemotherapy regimens induced high CR plus PR rates in the neoadjuvant treatment of stage III and of locally recurrent breast carcinoma, and a high rate of pCR in stage III disease. These regimens warrant testing in phase III trials.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Vincristina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The bcl-2 gene encodes for a protein that is involved in cell death regulation. It frequently is expressed in breast tumors, in which it is associated with favorable prognostic factors. It has been suggested that bcl-2 also may act as a modulator of response to chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy. Because fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy has been established as a reliable method for the diagnosis and biologic characterization of breast carcinoma, we assessed Bcl-2 expression on FNAs from primary breast carcinoma and evaluated its correlations with other prognostic variables. METHODS: Bcl-2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), p53 protein expression, and Ki-67 growth fraction were evaluated by immunocytochemistry on FNAs from 130 patients with primary breast carcinoma. Nuclear cytologic grade was assessed on FNA smears. RESULTS: Bcl-2 was expressed in 99 of 130 FNAs (76%). Bcl-2 expression was correlated with positive ER (P < 0.001) and PgR (P < 0.001) status and inversely correlated with p53 (P = 0.0036), Ki-67 (P = 0.0073), and nuclear cytologic grade (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bcl-2 expression, evaluated by immunocytochemistry on FNAs from primary breast carcinoma, correlates with favorable prognostic features such as ER and PgR expression, p53 negativity, a low Ki-67 index, and high tumor differentiation. These results are in agreement with those found on histologic samples. As FNA biopsy is used increasingly as a primary tool in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma, Bcl-2 evaluation by immunocytochemistry on FNA may provide, in addition to other biologic variables, useful information for prognostic and predictive purposes, particularly in patients considered to be candidates for neoadjuvant treatments. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma/química , Carcinoma/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Antígeno Ki-67/análisis , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/análisis , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The conventional treatment of brain metastases not amenable to surgery is most often radiotherapy. Until now, pharmacologic issues related to the blood brain barrier (BBB) prevented a wide evaluation of chemotherapy. The authors previously reported that the combination of cisplatin (P) and etoposide (E) had strikingly high activity in patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to assess, in a larger prospective study, the front-line activity of that combination against brain metastases from breast carcinoma (BC), nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and malignant melanoma (MM) in patients previously untreated with radiotherapy. METHODS: From December 1986 to July 1993, 116 patients received P 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 and E 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 3, and 5 or on Days 4, 6, and 8 every 3 weeks. An insignificant change in the E schedule using the same dose on a random basis assured the prospective enrollment and the registration of all cases. Six patients were not eligible and three patients were excluded from the analysis because they were lost to follow-up shortly after the date of registration. One-hundred seven patients were considered for analysis. The distribution according to the primary tumor site was BC in 56 patients (52%), NSCLC in 43 (40%), and MM in 8 (8%). The first evaluation of response was performed after two cycles. In cases of no disease progression, chemotherapy was continued to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Among the 56 patients with BC, 7 achieved complete response (CR) (13%), 14 achieved partial response (PR), 12 had no change (NC), 15 had progressive disease (PD), and 8 had insufficient treatment or response was not assessed. The CR plus rate was 38%. Among the 43 patients with NSCLC, 3 achieved CR (7%), 10 achieved PR, 15 had SD, 7 had PD, and 8 had insufficient treatment or response was not assessed. The CR plus PR rate was 30%. None of the eight patients with MM achieved an objective response. The median survival was 31 weeks for patients with BC (range, 0-287), 32 for patients with NSCLC (0-392+), and 17 for patients with MM (2-48). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of P and E is effective for patients with brain metastases from BC and NSCLC. In this study, the response rate was of the same order as that reported for disseminated disease without central nervous system involvement. The survival figures compare favorably with some others reported in the literature for patients given radiotherapy. A randomized study is warranted to compare this chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for patients with brain metastases from BC or NSCLC not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An emotional campaign promoting the Di Bella cancer therapy was launched by the Italian media in 1997. Its effects on patients' hopes, feelings, and decision-making processes were largely unknown. We undertook an investigation of this issue. METHODS: Between Feb 25 and March 31, 1998, a ten-item questionnaire was distributed to 1300 unselected adult patients attending 13 cancer centres throughout Italy. Four expert psycho-oncologists reviewed the design and validity of the contents of the questionnaire. Sociodemographic information was also collected. FINDINGS: 1120 (86%) questionnaires were returned and analysed. The main sources of information were television/radio (62%) and newspapers (26%); only 5% cited doctors. The campaign induced optimism in the patients about the efficacy of the method (ineffective 1%, effective 42%, uncertain 57%), and 53% said their hope of cure was increased. However, 48% felt more confused. 24% do not discuss new treatments with their oncologists, and 20% would like to but cannot. When choosing a treatment, the advice of a trusted doctor was judged more important than scientific progress (53% vs 32%) and 63% would try even unproven treatments in the hope of a cure. Replies to many of the questions were influenced by patients' educational attainment and by the degree of communication with their oncologists. INTERPRETATION: Science cannot prevent the harm caused by such campaigns and their psychological consequences, particularly for less educated patients. When making decisions, patients are looking for hope from the treatment and trust in their doctor, both of which depend on effective doctor-patient communications that therefore need to be improved.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Medios de Comunicación de Masas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Escolaridad , Ética Profesional , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Second-look laparotomy and CA-125 are the gold standard in follow-up of ovarian carcinoma. Since no definite role seems established for cross-sectional imaging in assessment of recurrence we employed thin-section computed tomography (CT), correlated with CA-125 levels and detailed knowledge of the clinical history as a follow-up protocol One hundred seventy-seven patients with ovarian carcinoma were selected because of: (a) pathologically proven remission after first-line chemotherapy, (b) follow-up by means of thin-section CT every 6 months for the fist 3 years and every 10 months subsequently, (c) monitoring CA-125 serum levels every 3 months for the first 3 years and every 6 months subsequently; (d) pathologic confirmation or clinical and laboratory follow-up after 12 months or longer for the CT findings. Fifty percent of the patients showed recurrence of disease. Our protocol yielded 93.2% true positive, dubious findings in 5.6% 1.0% false negatives, 97.7% true negative, and 2.3% false positive. With a tailored technique, CT was particularly sensitive in early diagnosis of peritoneal seeding, even in the absence of ascites or increases in the levels of CA-125. Repeated administration of contrast medium, water enemas, and repeated scanning of suspicious volumes with differing scanning parameters were the factors managed by the radiologist. We conclude that thin-section CT, correlated with CA-125 levels and careful review of the clinical history could represent a valid alternative to repeated explorative laparotomies in the follow-up of ovarian carcinomas.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare raltitrexed (Tomudex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) a direct, specific thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus high-dose leucovorin (LV) as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 495 patients were randomized to raltitrexed (3 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks or 5-FU (400 mg/m2) plus LV (200 mg/m2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The randomized groups were well balanced demographically. With a minimum 17-month follow-up, median survival was comparable between groups (10.9 months raltitrexed v 12.3 months 5-FU/LV; hazards ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.42; P=.197), although time to progression was statistically significantly shorter in the raltitrexed group. Overall objective responses were comparable (19% raltitrexed v 18% 5-FU/LV), with more than 50% of patients in each group having stable disease. Significantly less World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 stomatitis (2% v 16%, P < .001) and a reduced incidence of leukopenia (6% v 13%) and diarrhea (10% v 19%) occurred in the raltitrexed group (particularly at cycle 1 ). This resulted in fewer dose reductions at cycle 2 (4% raltitrexed v 28% 5-FU/LV) and early quality-of-life (QoL) benefits for raltitrexed patients. Reversible, clinically insignificant increases in transaminases were reported in 13% of raltitrexed patients. Palliative benefits of weight gain, improved performance status, and reduced disease-related symptoms were evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Raltitrexed is confirmed as an effective option in the first-line palliative management of ACC, with comparable efficacy to and tolerability advantages (in terms of reduced incidence of stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia) over 5-FU/LV. Raltitrexed has the added convenience of an every 3 weeks dosing schedule.