Bridging and Validation of the Specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire With Health State Utility Values.

OBJECTIVE: In thyroid eye disease (TED), inflammation and expansion of orbital muscle and periorbital fat result in diplopia and proptosis, severely impacting patient quality of life (QOL). The reported health state utility (HSU) scores, which are QOL measures, allow quantification of TED impact and improvement with therapies; however, no current QOL instrument has been validated with HSU scores for TED. Here, we used the disease-specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life (GO-QOL) questionnaire and HSU scores to validate QOL impact. METHODS: The GO-QOL scores from patients in 2 randomized, masked, placebo-controlled teprotumumab trials (N=171) were compared with 6 HSU values based on severity of proptosis/diplopia in those studies. Patient GO-QOL and HSU scores were compared at baseline and after 6-month treatment via regression analyses. GO-QOL and HSU scores were correlated for validation and quantification of QOL impact by severity state and to estimate quality-adjusted life year improvement. RESULTS: GO-QOL scores were correlated with TED severity, indicating that worse severity was associated with lower (worse) GO-QOL scores. Less severe health states were represented by higher (better) GO-QOL scores. Importantly, GO-QOL scores were positively correlated with utility scores of the 6 health states, allowing for conversion of the GO-QOL scores to utility scores. A positive (improved) 0.013 utility change was found for each 1-point (positive) improvement in GO-QOL score produced by teprotumumab versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe active TED health states demonstrate increasing TED severity associated with declining utility values and worsening GO-QOL scores. These results indicate that the GO-QOL scores can be used to bridge to the HSU scores for benefit quantification.

The Role of Ophthalmology in Tele-Stroke Consults for Triaging Acute Vision Loss.

Advances in telemedicine have allowed physicians to provide care in areas that were previously geographically or practically inaccessible. Roughly 70% of all US hospital have less than 200 bed capacity and nearly 50% have fewer than 100 beds. These smaller hospitals often do not have specialists available for bedside patient care, making them potential beneficiaries of telemedicine medical specialty services. In 2005, the American Stroke Association proposed implementing telemedicine services in effort to increase access to acute stroke care in neurologically underserved areas such as small hospitals. Tele-stroke services have since become established across the country and are now utilized by approximately 30% of US hospitals. By reducing the time between presentation and evaluation by a stroke specialist, tele-stroke programs have successfully increased patient access to life-saving treatment with tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) treatments. This change has been especially profound remote and underserved community hospitals. However in the evaluation of acute vision loss, an area where ophthalmology and stroke care overlap, increased reliance on tele-stroke services has contributed to some unique challenges. Acute vision has a complex differential and is commonly a result of conditions other than stroke. When tele-stroke services are engaged for the evaluation of acute vision loss, the neurologist is asked to make medical decisions without complete information about the eye. This situation can expose patients to costly or inappropriate testing, unnecessary hospitalizations, or lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment of non-neurologic conditions of the eye. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the overlap between stroke and vision loss, highlight the challenges inherent in using tele-stroke in evaluating acute vision loss and to offer our comments on how increased communication between emergency medicine, ophthalmology, and neurology services can ensure that patients with vision loss receive the highest standard of care in all hospitals.

Teprotumumab-Related Adverse Events in Thyroid Eye Disease: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the duration, incidence, reversibility, and severity of adverse events (AEs) in patients with thyroid eye disease (TED) treated with teprotumumab. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TED of all stages and activity levels treated with at least 4 infusions of teprotumumab. METHODS: Patients were treated with teprotumumab between February 2020 and October 2022 at 6 tertiary centers. Adverse event metrics were recorded at each visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measure was AE incidence and onset. Secondary outcome measures included AE severity, AE reversibility, AE duration, proptosis response, clinical activity score (CAS) reduction, and Gorman diplopia score improvement. RESULTS: The study evaluated 131 patients. Proptosis improved by 2 mm or more in 77% of patients (101/131), with average proptosis improvement of 3.0 ± 2.1 mm and average CAS reduction of 3.2 points. Gorman diplopia score improved by at least 1 point for 50% of patients (36/72) with baseline diplopia. Adverse events occurred in 81.7% of patients (107/131). Patients experienced a median of 4 AEs. Most AEs were mild (74.0% [97/131]), 28.2% (37/131) were moderate, and 8.4% (11/131) were severe. Mean interval AE onset was 7.9 weeks after the first infusion. Mean resolved AE duration was 17.6 weeks. Forty-six percent of patients (60/131) demonstrated at least 1 persistent AE at last follow-up. Mean follow-up was 70.2 ± 38.5 weeks after the first infusion. The most common type of AEs was musculoskeletal (58.0% [76/131]), followed by gastrointestinal (38.2% [50/131]), skin (38.2% [50/131]), ear and labyrinth (30.5% [40/131]), nervous system (20.6% [27/131]), metabolic (15.3% [20/131]), and reproductive system (12.2% [16/131]). Sixteen patients (12.2%) discontinued therapy because of AEs, including hearing loss (n = 4), inflammatory bowel disease flare (n = 2), hyperglycemia (n = 1), muscle spasms (n = 1), and multiple AEs (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are commonly reported while receiving teprotumumab treatment. Most are mild and reversible; however, serious AEs can occur and may warrant treatment cessation. Treating physicians should inform patients about AE risk, properly screen patients before treatment, monitor patients closely throughout therapy, and understand how to manage AEs should they develop. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Teprotumumab for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Thyroid Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: Teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor monoclonal antibody, is FDA-approved to treat thyroid eye disease (TED). The initial clinical trials excluded patients with previous orbital irradiation, surgery, glucocorticoid use (cumulative dose >1 gm), or prior biologic treatment. Information on the use of teprotumumab for patients who failed prior therapy is limited. Our purpose is to characterize the efficacy of teprotumumab for the treatment of recalcitrant TED. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of all patients treated with teprotumumab for moderate-to-severe TED after failing conventional therapy with corticosteroids, orbital radiation, surgical decompression, biologics, or other steroid-sparing medications. Treatment failure was defined as an incomplete response to or reactivation after previous treatment. Only patients who received at least 4 infusions of teprotumumab were included in the analysis. Primary outcome measures comprised proptosis response (≥2 mm reduction in the study eye without a similar increase in the other eye), clinical activity score (CAS) response (≥2-point reduction in CAS), and diplopia response (≥1 point improvement in Gorman diplopia score in patients with baseline diplopia) following treatment. Adverse events and risk factors for recalcitrant disease were also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study, 46 females and 20 males. Average age was 59.3 years (range 29-93). The mean duration of disease from TED diagnosis to first infusion was 57.8 months. The proptosis, CAS, and diplopia responses in this recalcitrant patient population were 85.9%, 93.8%, and 69.1%, respectively. Patients experienced a mean reduction in proptosis of 3.1 ± 2.4 mm and a mean improvement in CAS of 3.8 ± 1.6. Patients who underwent prior decompression surgery experienced a statistically significant decrease in diplopia response (46.7% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.014) and proptosis response (75.0% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.045) when compared with nondecompression patients. Additionally, there were no significant differences in proptosis, CAS, and diplopia responses between patients with acute (defined as disease duration <1 year) versus chronic (disease duration ≥1 year) TED. While most adverse events were mild to moderate, 4 patients reported serious adverse events related to persistent hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recalcitrant TED demonstrated a significant improvement after teprotumumab in each of the primary study outcomes. The degree of proptosis reduction, diplopia response, and CAS improvement in the recalcitrant group were similar to those of treatment-naïve patients from the pivotal clinical trials. Patients with a prior history of orbital decompression, however, demonstrated poor improvement in diplopia and less reduction in proptosis than surgery naïve patients. These results indicate that teprotumumab is a treatment option for the treatment of patients with TED recalcitrant to prior medical therapies.

Change in lacrimal gland volume and aqueous tear production following treatment with teprotumumab.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye syndrome occurs in up to 85% of patients with thyroid eye disease (TED). Lacrimal gland enlargement correlates with subjective tearing and a reduction in quality of life in patients with TED. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study, patients presenting for the treatment of TED were considered for eligible. Primary outcomes included a change in the volume of the lacrimal gland and the production of tears following treatment with teprotumumab. The volume of lacrimal glands and proptosis was calculated using 3D volumetric analysis. Tear production was measured by Schirmer's test and associated symptoms were assessed using the VLSQ-8. The orbit with the most proptosis was designated the study orbit and the contralateral orbit was designated the fellow orbit. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 61 (18) and mean duration of TED prior to therapy was 48 months (47). Lacrimal gland volume in the study orbit decreased from 768 mm3 (288) to 486 mm3 (173) (p < 0.01) following therapy. For the fellow orbit, volume reduced from 637 mm3 (261) to 379 mm3 (147) (p < 0.01). Schirmer's test reading (STR) in the study orbit increased from 14.5 mm (8.2) to 23 mm (10) (p < 0.01) (59%) following treatment. In the fellow orbit, STR increased from 12.7 mm (7) to 21 mm (9) post therapy (69%) (p < 0.01). There was a significant improvement on all parts of the VLSQ-8. CONCLUSION: Teprotumumab significantly reduces TED related expansion of the lacrimal gland, increases tear production, and improves dry eye symptoms.

Utility Assessment of Moderate to Severe Thyroid Eye Disease Health States.

Importance: Thyroid eye disease (TED) results in varying degrees of proptosis and diplopia negatively affecting quality of life (QoL), producing possibly substantial visual changes, disfigurement, and disability. Objective: To determine the association of varying TED severities with QoL in a non-TED population by assessing health state utility scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study, conducted from April 20, 2020, to April 29, 2021, assessed health states for active, moderate-severe TED, and values were elicited using time trade-off methods. Six health states of varying severity were determined from 2 placebo-controlled clinical trials (171 patients with TED and clinical activity score ≥4, ±diplopia/proptosis) and refined using interviews with US patients with TED (n = 6). Each health state description was validated by interviews with additional TED patient advocates (n = 3) and physician experts (n = 3). Health state descriptions and a QOL questionnaire were piloted and administered to a general population. Visual analog scales (VASs) were also administered to detect concurrence of the findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: TED health state utility scores and whether they differ from one another were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum, and paired t tests. Results: A total of 111 participants completed time trade-off interviews. The mean (SD) utility value was 0.44 (0.34). The lowest (worse) mean utility value was observed in the most severe disease state (constant diplopia/large proptosis) with 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36), followed by constant diplopia/small proptosis (0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), intermittent or inconstant diplopia/large proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no diplopia/large proptosis (0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), and intermittent or inconstant diplopia/small proptosis (0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). The highest (best) mean value, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.67), was observed for the least severe disease state (no diplopia/small proptosis). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that patients with active, moderate-severe TED may have substantial disutility, with increasing severity of proptosis/diplopia more likely to have detrimental associations with QoL. These health state scores may provide a baseline for determining QoL improvement in these TED health states (utility gains) treated with new therapies.

A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Thyroid Eye Disease How Teprotumumab Has Changed the Therapeutic Interface.

BACKGROUND: Teprotumumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED). Since its approval, aside from data on the safety and clinical efficacy of teprotumumab from Phase-2 and Phase-3 trials, only a handful of reports have been published regarding its use in the wider population. In this review, we briefly describe the mechanism of action of teprotumumab and review the literature to provide an overview of published clinical experience. This information was used to provide recommendations for patient selection, management of patient expectations, infusion details and site options, tips to optimize the authorization process, and how to monitor and mitigate side effects. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systemic review of the literature was performed regarding teprotumumab, focusing on its mechanisms of action and published reports on its use on patients with TED. A review of Embase, Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted. RESULTS: Clinical experience following the approval of teprotumumab has confirmed its efficacy in reducing inflammation and proptosis in patients with acute TED (<2 years). The reduction in proptosis occurs due to a reduction in orbital fat and muscle volume. Furthermore, there is evidence for its use in patients with compressive optic neuropathy. There are also reports that show its efficacy in reducing proptosis, inflammation, and diplopia in patients with chronic TED (>2 years). Teprotumumab was associated with side effects, such as muscle spasm, hearing loss, and hyperglycemia. To date, 2 case reports have shown a possible association with flares of inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Teprotumumab is a powerful therapeutic option for the treatment of TED. Clinical experience following FDA approval has demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with acute and chronic TED. It is the only therapeutic option that has been shown to reduce orbital soft tissue expansion in TED. However, it is expensive, and sometimes, obtaining insurance authorization can be time consuming and difficult. Further work will reveal its full side effect profile and help to establish its role in the armamentarium used to treat TED.

Thyroid dermopathy responds to teprotumumab therapy.

Summary: Thyroid dermopathy is an uncommon manifestation of thyroid disease that impairs the quality of life in certain cases. Currently, the available treatments offer limited results and a chance of recurrence. Teprotumumab, a novel medication that results in the regression of thyroid ophthalmopathy, may have similar effects on dermopathy. We describe four patients treated with teprotumumab for their thyroid ophthalmopathy who concomitantly had dermatopathy upon initiation of their infusions. Patients improved after two to three infusions and three out of the four patients have not suffered a recurrence.Teprotumumab is a monoclonal antibody (MAB) that attenuates an inflammatory response, resulting in decreased edema and tissue expansion. Given the similarities of their pathophysiology, we believe that the resolution of thyroid dermatopathy and regression of thyroid eye disease occurs via the same mechanism. We encourage further investigation utilizing teprotumumab for patients whose dermopathy is associated with impaired quality of life. Learning points: Thyroid dermopathy (TD), an uncommon manifestation of thyroid disease, may occasionally impair function and quality of life. There are only a few treatments for TD, with limited results and high rates of recurrence. Teprotumumab is a Food and Drug Administration-approved medication used for thyroid eye disease (TED). Our patients treated with teprotumumab for TED showed improvement of TD, which demonstrates its potential use for this condition.

Teprotumumab for the treatment of chronic thyroid eye disease.

BACKGROUND: Teprotumumab, a novel IGF-1R antibody was recently shown to significantly reduce the signs of active Thyroid eye disease (TED). The current study reviews its efficacy in chronic TED. METHODS: In this retrospective review, consecutive patients with chronic stable TED (>2 years), who had received ≥3 infusions of teprotumumab were included. All patients had measurements of proptosis, and calculation of the CAS and diplopia scores before and after therapy. Five-point strabismus scores were also calculated. Patients who had imaging within 4 months prior to therapy and 6 weeks post therapy underwent orbital 3D volumetric analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) duration of TED was 81 months (56) and the mean (SD) number of infusions received by each patient was 7 (2). Mean (SD) reduction in proptosis for each study orbit was 3.5 mm (0.4) and 3 mm (0.3) for the fellow orbit. The CAS response was 90% for the study orbit and 87% for the fellow orbit. Of the 15 patients who had diplopia at baseline, 67% had a clinically significant response, while 47% had complete resolution following treatment. Following teprotumumab, mean (SD) reduction of muscle tissue was 2011 mm3 (1847) in the study orbit and 1620 mm3 (1759) in the fellow orbit. The mean (SD) reduction of fat volume was 2101 mm3 (1681) in the study orbit and 1370 mm3 (1181) in the fellow orbit. CONCLUSION: Teprotumumab significantly reduces proptosis, inflammation, diplopia, strabismus and orbital soft tissue volume in patients with chronic TED.

Bridging the Gap between Ophthalmology and Emergency Medicine in Community-Based Emergency Departments (EDs): A Neuro-Ophthalmology Guide for ED Practitioners.

Coordination of care for patients with neuro-ophthalmic disorders can be very challenging in the community emergency department (ED) setting. Unlike university- or tertiary hospital-based EDs, the general ophthalmologist is often not as familiar with neuro-ophthalmology and the examination of neuro-ophthalmology patients in the acute ED setting. Embracing image capturing of the fundus, using a non-mydriatic camera, may be a game-changer for communication between ED physicians, ophthalmologists, and tele-neurologists. Patient care decisions can now be made with photographic documentation that is then conveyed through HIPAA-compliant messaging with accurate and useful information with both ease and convenience. Likewise, external photos of the anterior segment and motility are also helpful. Finally, establishing clinical and imaging guidelines for common neuro-ophthalmic disorders can help facilitate complete and appropriate evaluation and treatment.

Infusion Center Guidelines for Teprotumumab Infusions: Informed Consent, Safety, and Management of Side Effects.

Teprotumumab was the first and only medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of thyroid eye disease in January 2020. Thyroid eye disease is a complex autoimmune inflammatory disease that can be sight-threatening, debilitating, and disfiguring to affected patients. Although biologic therapies are a preferred treatment option for many complex immunologic and oncologic conditions, their use in ophthalmology and endocrinology may be more novel. The goals of this article are to introduce this new therapeutic option; discuss its mechanism of action, indications for use, administration protocol, infusion precautions, and informed consent; and review common side effects and management.

Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Thyroid Eye Disease in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune condition producing ocular pain, dysmotility, and ocular structure and function changes. As disease activity changes, redness, swelling, and pain can improve, but eye comfort, appearance, and motility alterations often persist. There are limited data on chronic TED patient-reported outcomes. This study examined chronic US TED patient-reported symptoms and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Existing data from an online survey regarding chronic TED signs/symptoms and patient QOL were retrospectively examined. The Graves' Ophthalmopathy QOL instrument (GO-QOL; 0-100, 100 = highest QOL) evaluated overall, appearance, and vision-related QOL. Influencing factors were examined by stratifying patients into low (overall QOL ≤ 50), moderate (> 50 and < 75), and high (≥ 75) QOL categories. RESULTS: One hundred patients (47 women, 81 Caucasian, 45.2 ± 7.6 years) were included. The duration of inactive TED was 3.0 ± 4.6 years and total duration of TED was 5.8 ± 5.9 years. Patients reported an average of 20 doctor visits/year and high prevalence of anxiety (34%) and depression (28%). Prior TED treatments for the polled population included systemic corticosteroids during active TED (25%), orbital radiation (5%), and surgery (25%). The overall GO-QOL score was 60.5 ± 21.8 (vision-related: 58.6 ± 24.0, appearance-related: 62.3 ± 25.1). Patients with low QOL more frequently reported hypothyroidism, anxiety, and a larger number of chronic TED signs/symptoms (average: 4.2). Compared to high QOL patients, low QOL patients had more pain (39% vs. 13%), blurry vision (30% vs. 17%), and diplopia (27% vs. 3%, all p ≤ 0.025). Additionally, the low QOL group more often had TED-specific surgical history (45% vs. 10%, p = 0.002), more often reported disability/unemployment (21% vs. 3%, p = 0.055), and had a higher number of doctor visits (40 vs. 5 visits/person/year, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TED severely impacts patient QOL, despite becoming stable and chronic. Patients reported vision and appearance impairment and psychosocial impact long after acute TED had subsided.

Thyroid eye disease (TED) occurs when loss of immune tolerance results in orbital and retro-orbital inflammation. Fat and muscle tissue can swell severely, causing debilitating symptoms, including pain around/behind the eyes, eye movement abnormalities, bulging eyes (proptosis), and double vision (diplopia), manifesting in appearance and vision quality of life (QOL) changes. Some improvement can occur as inflammation quiets and TED becomes chronic/inactive. However, appearance and visual changes often remain due to persistent proptosis and eye muscle and eyelid changes. This study examined TED symptoms and QOL in 100 chronic TED patients. They answered questions about symptoms, how TED affected them, and their medical care. The average duration of TED was 6 years (3 years inactive), patients had an average of 20 TED-related doctor visits/year, and nearly one-half (42%) of patients reported having anxiety and/or depression. Prior TED treatments included steroids (25% when TED-related inflammation was present), orbital radiation (5%), and surgery (25%). Disease-specific QOL scores (average score: 60.5 of 100) indicated that these chronic patients reported similar QOL impact as those with moderate-to-severe, active disease. Compared with the least impacted group, the most impacted patients reported higher rates of hypothyroidism (18% vs. 0%), anxiety (48% vs. 17%), disability/unemployment (21% vs.3%), number of doctor visits (40 vs. 5 visits/person/year), pain (39% vs. 13%), blurry vision (30% vs. 17%), diplopia (27% vs. 3%), and surgical treatment for TED (45% vs. 10%). This study demonstrates that QOL continues to be severely impacted by TED long after TED-related inflammation has quieted.

Early efficacy of teprotumumab for the treatment of dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To study post-interventional findings in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) treated with teprotumumab. OBSERVATIONS: In this multicenter observational Case series, patients with DON were treated with teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor I receptor inhibitor (10 mg/kg for the first infusion then 20 mg/kg for subsequent infusions, every three weeks for a total 8 infusions). This study included patients with acute and chronic thyroid eye disease (TED) with DON who had failed conventional therapies and were not candidates for surgical decompression. Data collected included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), color vision, RAPD when present, and orbital CT or MRI. Proptosis, clinical activity score (CAS), Gorman diplopia score (GDS), and Humphrey visual fields (HVF) were also evaluated.Ten patients (6 women, 4 men) with an average age 64 years old were included in this study. Mean follow up after completion of infusions was 15 weeks. Baseline visual acuity (VA) impairment ranged from hand motion (HM) to 20/25 in affected eyes. All patients had pre-treatment orbital CT or MRI that confirmed orbital apex compression. Seventy percent of patients had objective improvement in DON after 2 infusions of teprotumumab measured as significant improvement in visual acuity, resolution of RAPD, or both. After completion of treatment, affected eyes had a mean BCVA improvement of 0.87 logMAR (p=0.0207), proptosis reduction of 4.7 mm (p<0.00001), CAS improvement of 5.25 points (p<0.00001), and GDS improvement of 0.75 points (p=0.160). All 6 patients who presented with an RAPD had resolution or improvement of RAPD. All 7 patients who presented with color vision deficits had normalization or improvement of color vision. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Teprotumumab infusions resulted in medical decompression and objective resolution or improvement of dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Most patients had rapid improvement of visual acuity and reversal of RAPD. Post-infusion imaging demonstrated reduction in extraocular muscle size that correlated with improvement in visual dysfunction. However, patients who presented with longstanding severe visual loss had limited improvement. There was no recurrence of DON after completion of teprotumumab in our cohort.

Primary Malignant Orbital Tumors.

Objective Primary orbital malignancy is rare. Awareness of the characteristic clinical and imaging features is imperative for timely identification and management. Surgery remains an important diagnostic and treatment modality for primary orbital malignancy, but determining the optimal surgical approach can be challenging. The purpose of this article is to explore recent advances in the diagnosis, management, and surgical approaches for primary orbital malignancies. Design In this review, the clinical presentation, imaging features, and medical and surgical management of primary orbital malignancies with representative cases will be discussed. Setting Outpatient and inpatient hospital settings. Participants Patients with diagnosed primary orbital malignancies. Main Outcome Measures Descriptive outcomes. Results Advancements in orbital imaging, microsurgical techniques, and multimodal therapy have improved the diagnosis and management of primary orbital malignancies. Special considerations for biopsy or resection are made based on the tumor's location, characteristics, nearby orbital structures, and goals of surgery. Minimally invasive techniques are supplanting traditional approaches to orbital surgery with less morbidity. Conclusions Advances in imaging technologies and surgical techniques have facilitated the diagnosis and management of primary orbital malignancies. Evolution toward less invasive orbital surgery with focus on preservation and restoration of function is underway.

Putting the Pieces Back Together: Optimizing Function and Appearance after Orbital Surgery.

Objectives To describe medical and surgical options and techniques for functional and aesthetic abnormalities after orbital surgery and multidisciplinary approaches that include the orbit. Design A review of current management options in outpatient clinics and ambulatory surgery centers with selected illustrative cases. The rationale for choosing specific medical and surgical interventions will be discussed with a focus on eyelid malposition and double vision. Setting Outpatient clinics and ambulatory surgery centers. Participants Patients with eyelid, orbital, eye muscle, and scalp contour abnormalities as a result of medical and surgical interventions for brain and/or orbital tumors. Main Outcome Measures Descriptive outcomes. Results A variety of medical and surgical options are available to optimize eyelid, orbit, extraocular muscle, and scalp structure and function.

Perioperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in 1,250 Orbital Surgeries.

PURPOSE: Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is used for many clean-contaminated surgeries or clean surgeries with an implant, but its value for clean orbital surgery has not been determined. This study investigated infection risks and adverse effects related to antibiotics in patients undergoing orbital surgery. METHODS: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative case series of all patients undergoing orbital surgery with participating surgeons between October 1, 2013, and March 1, 2015. Types of surgery, antibiotic regimens, corticosteroid use, antibiotic side effects, and surgical site infections (SSIs) were entered into an electronic database and subsequently analyzed. Cases in which patients received postoperative oral antibiotics were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Of 1,250 consecutive orbital surgeries, 1,225 met inclusion criteria. A total of 1208 patients were included in the primary analysis: 603 received no antibiotic prophylaxis (group A), and 605 received a single dose of intravenous antibiotic (group B). Five patients (0.42%) developed an SSI, 3 in group A and 2 in group B. The difference in SSI rates was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (p = 0.66). Antibiotic prophylaxis, alloplastic implants, paranasal sinus entry, and corticosteroid use were not associated with differences in SSI rates. All SSIs resolved on a single course of oral antibiotics; an implant was removed in 1 case. There were no complications associated with a single dose of intravenous prophylaxis. However, 12% of 17 patients (group C) who received 1 week of oral postoperative prophylactic antibiotics developed antibiotic-related complications (diarrhea, renal injury), yielding a number needed to harm of 8.5. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series, antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear to have reduced the already low incidence of SSI following orbital surgery. Given the detriments of systemic antibiotics, the rarity of infections related to orbital surgery, and the efficacy of treating such infections should they occur, patients undergoing orbital surgery should be educated to the early symptoms of postoperative infection and followed closely, but do not routinely require perioperative antibiotics.

Disseminated silicone granulomatosis in the face and orbit.

PURPOSE: To report a case of disseminated silicone granulomatosis presenting with ptosis, proptosis and vision loss. OBSERVATIONS: A 56-year-old female presented with ptosis, proptosis, and vision loss and was noted to have palpable, erythematous masses involving the orbit, face, trunk, and body. She had a history of bilateral silicone breast implants and cosmetic facial filler injections. Orbital biopsy demonstrated non-caseating granulomas with foreign-body giant cells and vacuoles containing material consistent with silicone. Removal of the patient's breast implants and systemic immunosuppression led to dramatic granuloma regression. CONCLUSIONS: Silicone can induce a severe, systemic inflammatory response and should be considered in the differential for facial and periorbital granulomas in patients with a history of silicone breast implants. Management of disseminated silicone granulomatosis is challenging and requires multimodal treatment with silicone removal and systemic immunomodulation.