Implementation of the My Abilities First Tool: A qualitative study on the perceptions of professionals, caregivers, children, and adolescents with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the perceptions of professionals, caregivers, children, and adolescents with disabilities regarding the implementation of the My Abilities First (MAF) tool in Specialized Child Rehabilitation Centers (CERs). METHOD: This is a qualitative research based on Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA). The study involved twenty-seven intentionally selected individuals, comprising 12 physiotherapists, 4 occupational therapists, 11 caregivers, 9 children and 2 adolescents. Participants completed sociodemographic and clinical questionnaires and took part in semi-structured online interviews, focusing on two themes: Positive health approaches and the MAF tool. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (opinion 4.779.175). RESULTS: Reflexive Thematic Analysis of the interviews resulted in two themes: (1) Perceptions regarding the MAF tool as an educational and contributory process to enhance the inclusion and participation of children and adolescents with disabilities, and (2) Barriers and facilitators for the implementation process of the MAF tool. The implementation of MAF was identified as a driving factor in promoting equity and increased participation of children and adolescents with disabilities in various settings, including health, education, and leisure. Interviewees highlighted the need to confront attitudinal, communication, and social barriers that may hinder the implementation of the tool. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the MAF tool was perceived as an innovation due to its focus on the abilities of individuals with disabilities. However, there is a need to restructure it to broaden its scope and access to different contexts in order to confront barriers and enhance the inclusion and participation of children and adolescents with disabilities.

The burden of global outbreaks: Photos of the daily lives of children with congenital Zika syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In Brazil, more than 3500 children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) face difficulties participating in activities of daily living, which may be aggravated by health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Participation could be defined as the individual's involvement in daily life situations, and participation restrictions are problems that may arise in involvement in everyday situations. AIM: To explore the daily lives of children with CZS during the COVID-19 pandemic using photographic narratives captured by mothers and discuss possible strategies to improve participation results. METHODS: In this participatory action research, seven young Brazilian mothers acted as co-researchers using photovoice to describe the experiences of their children with CZS (from 2 to 5 years old). Also, mothers contributed to validate the contents. The research was conducted online and included the following steps: pilot study, recruitment, individualized training, sociodemographic interview, photovoice training, photo taking, focus group for contextualization, data transcription and analysis and validation of analyses by the mothers. RESULTS: Content analysis revealed five categories that influenced the participation of the children: participation preferences, family relationships, access to healthcare, access to education and social isolation. Regarding participation preferences, mothers reported their children's desire to play with peers and family members and have autonomy. Mothers described the family environment as a happy, peaceful and safe place for the children. Lack of therapy was perceived to negatively impact the health of children; thus, treatments were considered essential for child development. Access to education included accessibility of remote education and a perceived lack of infrastructure and pedagogical preparation. Last, social isolation due to COVID-19 directly affected the daily lives and behaviour of the children, interrupting therapies and medical appointments. CONCLUSION: The photos and narratives captured several aspects of the daily lives of children with CZS impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, reinforcing the importance of considering the negative effects of social isolation and offering education and social assistance to promote participation and integral health. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Consistent with a participatory action research framework, Mothers acted as co-researchers and participated in all stages of the research, especially in validating the data analysed by the researchers.

My child is growing and now? Exploring the environmental needs of children with congenital Zika syndrome according to their caregivers' perceptions.

INTRODUCTION: Promoting social inclusion of children with congenital Zika virus syndrome (CZS) is challenging, mostly, when there is a transport problem, low access to information and a long distance between the house and health services. Participation can be understood as involvement in a life situation and is strongly influenced by physical, social and attitudinal environmental factors; however, was still little explored in the case of children with CZS. In this sense, this study aimed to explore the perception of caregivers about the environmental needs of children with CZS, differentiating barriers and facilitators. METHODS: This is qualitative research. Thematic analysis was used to identify the environmental needs perceived by caregivers of children with CZS. The patient public involvement (PPI) approach was incorporated with the purpose of validating the data analysis performed by the researchers. After this step, the data were categorized in terms of barriers and facilitators and validated by the group of researchers. RESULTS: A relevant environmental need reported by caregivers as a barrier was social support for children with CZS. Ableism was also evidenced as an important attitudinal barrier. Health services were essential for the lives of children with CZS and the availability of auxiliary devices as facilitators of participation. Environmental factors related to medication and food routines were, for the most part, facilitators. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to critical approaches to the impacts linked to environmental factors of children with CZS, recognition of these children is an evolving process and fundamental to basic rights for adequate living in society. The data point to the need to implement public policies aimed at children with CZS, as well as the availability of qualified professionals to apply family-centred care and skills-focused management. Building friendly environments that promote broad social participation will contribute to the healthy growth of children with CZS. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Six caregivers (20% of the caregivers) as part of the PPI approach were contacted and participated in individual virtual meetings to discuss the results of the thematic analysis regarding the environmental needs of children with CZS.