Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 3(10): 782-7, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24039169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of inhalant allergies involves a medical history, physical exam, and allergen sensitivity testing; allergen sensitivity can be assessed by a specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) screen for inhalant allergens. Some patients with clinical suspicion for inhalant allergies have a negative specific IgE screen, but high total IgE. We theorize that elevated total IgE may indicate a false-negative screen caused by "missed allergens" not initially identified. METHODS: Study patients with a negative allergy screen and elevated IgE (>116 kU/L) were identified (n = 26). Control patients (n = 26) were defined as having a negative screen and an IgE <2.95 kU/L. Both groups were tested with an expanded specific IgE panel and completed a questionnaire about other causes of elevated IgE. RESULTS: The expanded panel was positive for inhalant allergens in 4 study patients (15%) and 0 control patients (p = 0.037). Within the study patients, 50% had asthma and 76.9% had chronic sinusitis. Only 2 control patients had asthma (11.5%), p = 0.003; 4 (19.2%) reported chronic sinusitis, p < 0.0001. Food allergen sensitivity was identified in 5 study patients and 1 control, p = 0.083. CONCLUSION: This pilot study evaluated patients clinically suspected of allergy with a negative inhalant IgE screen. Those with a high total IgE were more likely to have a missed inhalant allergen on expanded testing, as well as asthma and chronic sinusitis, compared to those with a low total IgE. Further investigation of "missed antigen" and the role of chronic respiratory inflammatory disease in patients with elevated total IgE is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico Tardío , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Prueba de Radioalergoadsorción , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
3.
Laryngoscope ; 119(2): 293-7, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19172609

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) compared to the gold standard, conventional carotid angiography, in the diagnosis of a dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Further objectives include identifying outcomes of treatment and complications as a function of pretreatment radiologic classification. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of adults diagnosed with a DAVF between 1990 and 2006. METHODS: Data collected included age, gender, presenting clinical symptoms, diagnostic imaging modalities (conventional angiography, CTA, and/or MRA), interventions (self-compression of artery, embolization, craniotomy, or a combination of these), results (symptoms resolved, improved, or same), and complications (embolic or surgical). All DAVFs were classified according to the Cognard classification. RESULTS: There were a total of 46 patients with 51 fistulas, of whom 42 patients (46 fistulas) had complete follow-up data. Using conventional angiography as the gold standard, CTA had a sensitivity of 15.4%, whereas MRA had a sensitivity of 50%. Embolization (either single or multiple treatments) was the most common treatment, being done in 36/46 (78%) fistulas. Presenting symptoms were resolved or improved in 45/46 fistulas (97.8%) regardless of treatment or Cognard classification. There were complications in 12/46 (26%) patients, most of which were transient and resolved without permanent sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: A DAVF is a vascular lesion that is best diagnosed with conventional angiography, but can often be found with MRA. Treatment with endovascular embolization is effective and has few significant complications.


Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Angiografía Cerebral , Femenino , Humanos , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 117(1): 15-7, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18254365

RESUMEN

Concha bullosa, a pneumatized middle turbinate, is a common anatomic variant found in the paranasal sinuses. When a concha bullosa becomes obstructed, it can form a mucocele and, eventually, a mucopyocele if it becomes secondarily infected. This is a rare phenomenon; only 9 concha bullosa mucopyoceles have been previously reported in the English-language literature. We present the case of a large concha bullosa mucopyocele in a pediatric patient in which the concha bullosa replaced the anterior ethmoid sinuses and was contiguous with the frontal sinus.


Asunto(s)
Senos Etmoidales/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Mucocele/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cornetes Nasales/anomalías , Niño , Endoscopía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mucocele/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/cirugía , Supuración , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Cornetes Nasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Cornetes Nasales/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA