Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 12: 1337937, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38544820

RESUMEN

Culture of oocytes and embryos in media under oil is a cornerstone of fertility treatment, and extensively employed in experimental investigation of early mammalian development. It has been noted anecdotally by some that certain small molecule inhibitors might lose activity in oil-covered culture systems, presumably by drug partitioning into the oil. Here we took a pseudo-pharmacological approach to appraise this formally using mouse oocytes and embryos. Using different culture dish designs with defined media:oil volume ratios, we show that the EC50 of the widely employed microtubule poison nocodazole shifts as a function of the media:oil ratio, such that nocodazole concentrations that prevent cell division in oil-free culture fail to in oil-covered media drops. Relatively subtle changes in culture dish design lead to measurable changes in EC50. This effect is not specific to one type of culture oil, and can be readily observed both in oocyte and embryo culture experiments. We subsequently applied a similar approach to a small panel of widely employed cell cycle-related inhibitors, finding that most lose activity in standard oil-covered oocyte/embryo culture systems. Our data suggest that loss of small molecule activity in oil-covered oocyte and embryo culture is a widespread phenomenon with potentially far-reaching implications for data reproducibility, and we recommend avoiding oil-covered culture for experiments employing inhibitors/drugs wherever possible.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982092

RESUMEN

Background: An intersectional approach to health research provides an analytical foundation to explain the multidimensionality of health status, resource accessibility, privilege, oppression, and current and historical context. The use of intersectionality in health research has known limitations. Its use in health-related fields too often focuses on outcomes, such as health disparities, rather than processes, such as power structures and social determinants. Objective: This scoping review serves to examine how intersectionality has been implemented by nurses in the peer-reviewed literature. We offer insight into how it may be incorporated to inform future nursing research and healthcare provision. Design & Methods: Systematic searches of PubMed (n = 257), SCOPUS (n = 807), EMBASE (n = 396), CINAHL (n = 224), and Health Source: Nursing and Academics (n = 491), published since the seminal publication on intersectionality (1989 - 2023), identified 131 research articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis were used to describe the breadth and depth of the literature specific to the application of intersectionality in nursing research. Results: The included studies used intersectionality to examine the intersections of numerous identities, such as race, gender, and immigration status. However, most studies were descriptive/observational in nature, underreported their methods, and conducted deficit-based research instead of strength-based inquiries. Of note, the vast majority of included articles were published within the last five years. Conclusions: Future researchers using intersectionality as a framework can improve their approach by reporting clear definitions and operationalization of intersectionality. Observational science dominated the included studies; future research should focus on intervention development and evaluation using an intersectional lens. Lastly, caution should be placed on research that focuses solely on deficits among marginalized communities, which places scientists at risk of perpetuating stereotypes or enhancing already-existing stigmas.

3.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 8(2): 219-229, 2021 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33610139

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Factors responsible for poor sleep quality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes the effects of medications. This study evaluates the effect of the inhaled triple therapy of budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium versus placebo-tiotropium on sleep quality in COPD patients. METHODS: Twenty-three patients (11 [48%] males; age 55 [51-60, 48--5] years; body mass index [BMI] 25 [22-30, 18-40] kg/m2; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]1.10 [0.80 -1.90, 0.60-2.80] L, 42 [31-62, 24-75] % predicted) were studied. Ten patients were randomized to budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium and 13 patients to placebo-tiotropium. At baseline and after 28 days, patients completed spirometry, polysomnography, an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), COPD-specific St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C) and short form 36 (SF 36). RESULTS: After 28 days, there was a significant 29% increase in the bedtime FEV1 in the budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium group (from 0.75 [0.55-1.30, 0.50-2.40] L to 1.00 [0.75-1.55, 0.50-3.00] L, p=0.031), with no change in the placebo-tiotropium group (from 1.20 [0.80-1.50, 0.60-1.90] L to 1.15 [0.75-1.55, 0.50-1.80] L, p=0.91). No significant change was found post treatment in sleep efficiency or total sleep time in both the budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium group (from 78 [72-92, 62-98]% to 88 [77-92, 40-98]%, p=0.70 and 290 [268-358, 252-382] min to 342 [303-358, 157-372] min, p=0.77, respectively) and the placebo-tiotropium group (from 82 [75-88, 46-93]% to 84 [77-87, 62-94]%, p=0.96 and 320 [292-350, 180-378] min to 339 [303-349, 241-366] min, p=0.79, respectively). While there was no significant change in the arousal index in the budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium group (9 [5-16, 0-48] arousals/hour to 14 [9-17, 2-36] arousals/hour, p=0.43), a significant increase was seen in the placebo-tiotropium group (11 [4-13, 3--2] arousals/hour to 17 [11-21, 2-33] arousals/hour, p=0.027). Similarly, there was no change in the ESS in the budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium group (6 [3-8, 0-11] to 6 [5-8, 0-1]), p=0.44), but a marginally significant increase in the placebo-tiotropium group (8 [5-12, 2-18] to 10 [7-13, 5-18], p=0.07), with a significant difference in the ESS 28 days post treatment between the 2 groups (6 [5-8, 0-11] versus 10 [7-13, 5-18], p=0.043). There was no significant change in nocturnal oxygenation, sleep architecture, PSQI, SGRQ-C, or SF 36 in both groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with COPD, inhaled triple therapy with budesonide-formoterol-tiotropium as compared to placebo-tiotropium improves pulmonary function while preserving sleep quality and architecture.

4.
Nature ; 324(6097): 521, 1986 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517742
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...