Effect of polymorphism in the human glutathione S-transferase A1 promoter on hepatic GSTA1 and GSTA2 expression.

The patterns of expression of glutathione S-transferases A1 and A2 in human liver (hGSTA1 and hGSTA2, respectively) are highly variable, notably in the ratio of hGSTA1/hGSTA2. We investigated if this variation had a genetic basis by sequencing the proximal promoters (-721 to -1 nucleotides) of hGSTA1 and hGSTA2, using 55 samples of human liver that exemplified the variability of hGSTA1 and hGSTA2 expression. Variants were found in the hGSTA1 gene: -631T or G, -567T, -69C, -52G, designated as hGSTA1*A; and -631G, -567G, -69T, -52A, designated as hGSTA1*B. Genotyping for the substitution -69C > T by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), showed that the polymorphism was widespread in Caucasians, African-Americans and Hispanics, and that it appeared to conform to allelic variation. Constructs consisting of the proximal promoters of hGSTA1*A, hGSTA1*B or hGSTA2, with luciferase as a reporter gene, showed differential expression when transfected into HepG2 cells: hGSTA1*A approximately hGSTA2 > hGSTA1*B. Similarly, mean levels of hGSTA1 protein expression in liver cytosols decreased significantly according to genotype: hGSTA1*A > hGSTA1-heterozygous > hGSTA1*B. Conversely, mean hGSTA2 expression increased according to the same order of hGSTA1 genotype. Consequently, the ratio of GSTA1/GSTA2 was highly hGSTA1 allele-specific. Because the polymorphism in hGSTA1 correlates with hGSTA1 and hGSTA2 expression in liver, and hGSTA1-1 and hGSTA2-2 exhibit differential catalysis of the detoxification of carcinogen metabolites and chemotherapeutics, the polymorphism is expected to be of significance for individual risk of cancer or individual response to chemotherapeutic agents.

Purification and characterization of a glutathione S-transferase from the fungus Cunninghamella elegans.

Cunninghamella elegans grown on Sabouraud dextrose broth had glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. The enzyme was purified 172-fold from the cytosolic fraction (120000 x g) of the extract from a culture of C. elegans, using Q-Sepharose ion exchange chromatography and glutathione affinity chromatography. The GST showed activity against 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, 1,2-dichloro-4-nitrobenzene, 4-nitrobenzyl chloride, and ethacrynic acid. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel filtration chromatography revealed that the native enzyme was homodimeric with a subunit of M(r) 27000. Comparison by Western blot analysis implied that this fungal GST had no relationship with mammalian alpha-, mu-, and pi-class GSTs, although it showed a small degree of cross-reactivity with a theta-class GST. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified enzyme showed no significant homology with other known GSTs.

Polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1 and GSTT1) and survival after treatment for breast cancer.

The response to treatment for breast cancer is likely predicted by a number of disease and tumor tissue characteristics, many of which are under active investigation. One area that has received little attention is that of endogenous capabilities to respond to reactive oxygen species and subsequent byproducts resulting from radiation therapy and a number of chemotherapeutic agents, preventing cytotoxicity toward tumor cells. The glutathione S-transferases are key conjugating enzymes in this response, and GSTM1 and GSTT1 have deletion polymorphisms that result in no enzyme activity. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the role of GSTM1- and GSTT1-null genotypes on disease-free and overall survival among 251 women who received treatment for incident, primary breast cancer. Women were identified through Tumor Registry records and normal archived tissue retrieved for genotyping. Adjusting for age, race, and stage at diagnosis, women with null genotypes for GSTM1 and GSTT1 had reduced hazard of death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.36-0.97; and HR, 0.51; CI, 0.29-0.90, respectively] in relation to those with alleles present. Furthermore, women who were null for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 had one-third the hazard of death of those with alleles for both genes present (adjusted HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70). Similar relationships were noted for risk of recurrence. These data indicate that interindividual differences in activity of enzymes that prevent therapy-generated reactive oxidant damage may have an important impact on disease recurrence and overall survival.

Association between survival after treatment for breast cancer and glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism.

A glutathione S-transferase (GST) P1 polymorphism results in an amino acid substitution, Ile105Val; the Val-containing enzyme has reduced activity toward alkylating agents. Cancer patients with the variant enzyme may differ in removal of treatment agents and in outcomes of therapy. We evaluated survival according to GSTP1 genotype among women (n = 240) treated for breast cancer. Women with the low-activity Val/Val genotype had better survival. Compared with Ile/Ile, hazard ratios for overall survival were 0.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.3) for Ile/Val and 0.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0) for Val/Val (P for trend = 0.04). Inherited metabolic variability may influence treatment outcomes.

Quantitative analysis of interindividual variation of glutathione S-transferase expression in human pancreas and the ambiguity of correlating genotype with phenotype.

Analysis of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) of the alpha, mu, and pi classes by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry in 43 samples of normal human pancreas demonstrated a wide variation in expression of subunits P1, A1, A2, A4, M1, M2, and M3 and the presence of a novel form designated GST "A5." GSTA2 consisted of three forms that were differentially expressed between individuals in a manner consistent with allelic polymorphism at the hGSTA2 locus. Expression, in terms of microg GST subunit/mg cytosolic protein, varied by 6-15-fold for subunits P1, A2, and M3 and 17-30-fold in the case of GSTs A1 and M2. Less consistently expressed were GSTs M1a, M1b, A4, and A5. Among these, GSTM1 expression (excluding M1-null samples) varied 12-fold between samples, whereas GST A4 and A5 expression varied approximately 50-100-fold between samples, well beyond the range of other subunits, suggesting that their expression is highly inducible. Linear correlations (P < 0.001-0.003) existed between levels of the most consistently expressed GST, GSTP1, and total GSTs, GSTA2 and M3, and in GSTM1-positive samples, between GSTM1, M3, and P1. The correlation between GST subunits P1 and M3 was bimodal according to M1 genotype, reflecting the presence of the regulatory element in hGSTM3*B that is linked with the hGSTM1*A genotype. It is concluded that although a degree of regulation of expression of GSTs occurs in human pancreas, the variability of phenotype is high and might obscure the effects of genetic polymorphisms on individual cancer susceptibility. Interindividual variation of GST expression is, therefore, a factor that should be taken account of in epidemiological studies.

Glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1) genetic polymorphisms do not affect human breast cancer risk, regardless of dietary antioxidants.

Glutathione-S-transferases catalyze the detoxication of carcinogen metabolites and reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced through a number of mechanisms. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) M1 is polymorphic, and the null allele results in a lack of enzyme activity. Because there are indications that ROS may be involved in breast carcinogenesis, we sought to determine whether the GSTM1 null allele was associated with increased breast cancer, particularly among women with lower consumption of dietary sources of alpha-tocopherol, carotenoids and ascorbic acid. In a study of diet and cancer in western New York, women with primary, incident, histologically confirmed breast cancer (n = 740) and community controls (n = 810) were interviewed and an extensive food-frequency questionnaire administered. A subset of these women provided a blood specimen. DNA was extracted and genotyping performed for GSTM1. Data were available for 279 cases and 340 controls. The null allele did not increase breast cancer risk, regardless of menopausal status. There were also no differences in associations between the polymorphism and risk among lower and higher consumers of dietary sources of antioxidants or smokers and nonsmokers. These results indicate that GSTM1 genetic polymorphisms are not associated with breast cancer risk, even in an environment low in antioxidant defenses.

Structural features of the antibody-A chain linkage that influence the activity and stability of ricin A chain immunotoxins.

The importance of the various structural elements constituting a ricin A chain immunotoxin to the stability of the disulfide bond between the antibody and A chain was examined using a panel of immunoconjugates prepared with the mouse monoclonal antibody Fib75. Analogues of the standard ricin A chain immunotoxin prepared with the N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate disulfide cross-linker included immunoconjugates made with N-succinimidyl 4-[(iodoacetyl)amino]benzoate the thioether cross-linker; with N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)butyrate, the hindered disulfide cross-linker; with a peptide spacer between the antibody and cross-linker; or with the dodecapeptide corresponding to the C-terminus of ricin A chain. The cytotoxic activities of the immunoconjugates and their susceptibility to reduction by glutathione in vitro were compared. The thioether-linked immunotoxin could not be cleaved by glutathione in vitro and had low cytotoxic potency, consistent with the requirement of a reducible disulfide linkage for activity. The hindered disulfide-linked immunotoxin was 3-fold more stable to reduction than the immunotoxin containing a standard unhindered disulfide linkage, but the cytotoxic activities of the two constructs were indistinguishable. The introduction of a flexible peptide Ala-Ala-Pro-Ala-Ala-Ala-Pro-Ala-Pro-Ala between Fib75 and the disulfide linkage introduced by SPDP had no deleterious effect on cytotoxic activity and no effect on the susceptibility of the disulfide linkage to reduction. This finding suggests that the enforced proximity of the A chain to the antibody caused by the use of a short chemical cross-linker in a conventional immunotoxin has no influence on either of these properties in this system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biological and chemical studies on 8,9-dihydroxy-8,9-dihydro-aflatoxin B1 and some of its esters.

A number of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) derivatives have been synthesized including 8-acyloxy- and 8-benzoyloxy-9-hydroxy-8,9-dihydro-AFB1 compounds, AFB1-8,9-diol and [3H] AFB1 labelled at the 9 position. AFB1-hydroxyesters appear to be models of AFB1-8,9-oxide in that they are bacterial mutagens, stimulate unscheduled DNA synthesis in HeLa cells and react with DNA to give trans-8,9-dihydro-8(7-guanyl)-9-hydroxy-AFB1 as the major adduct after hydrolysis. The potency of the hydroxyesters increases with ease of release of the ester grouping at position 8. Absence of the hydroxyl at position 9 gives compounds which are readily hydrolysed in water but are not biologically active. The hydroxyesters hydrolyse in water to give AFB1-diol, providing a convenient means of synthesis of this compound. Studies with AFB1-diol show that it reacts with one molecule of Tris base, probably through the ring-opened furan form, with the amino group of the Tris. Acidification results in ring closure in an analogous manner to AFB1-diol. AFB1-diol binds to DNA in vitro as well as to liver slice DNA. The compound is mutagenic towards S. typhimurium TA100 without metabolic activation. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the mechanisms of AFB1 carcinogenicity.

Comparison of aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1 binding to cellular macromolecules in vitro, in vivo and after peracid oxidation; characterisation of the major nucleic acid adducts.

A comparison between [14C]aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and [14C]aflatoxin G1 (AFG1) binding to rat liver and kidney cellular macromolecules has shown AFG1-DNA and-ribosomal RNA binding to be lower in both organs. For both mycotoxins more was bound to nucleic acids than to protein. Two hours after intraperitoneal injection (60 microgram/100 g) of [14C] AFB1, 40 ng, 151 ng/mg. Loss of radioactivity bound to liver DNA for both [14C]AFB1 and protein respectively and for [14C]AFG1 the respective figures were 10, 7 and 1 ng/mg. Loss of liver bound radioactivity to DNA for both [14C]AFG1 and [14C]AFG1 appeared to be biphasic indicating that an enzymic DNA repair process may be operating. In vitro binding studies also showed less AFG1 was bound to exogenous DNA after microsomal activation than AFB1. This difference was not a result of differences in the chemical reactivity of the "ultimate" electrophilic species, the respective expoxides, since chemical activation studies using 3-chloroperbenzoic acid showed similar amounts of AFG1 and AFB1 to be converted to the epoxides and to bind to DNA. Studies on the distribution coefficients of the two mycotoxins showed AFB1 to be more lipophilic than AFG1 and this may be an important factor in determining the weaker carcinogenicity of the latter compound. Characterisation of the major AFG1-DNA adduct formed in vitro, in vivo and after peracid oxidation showed it to have the structure trans-9,10-dihydro-9-(7-guanyl)-10-hydroxy-aflatoxin G1. This adduct is similar to that obtained from AFB1 by activation in vivo, in vitro and after peracid oxidation.