RESUMEN
The objective of this work is to analyze the reliability and validity of the new inertial measurement unit (IMU) PUSHTM Band2.0 to measure barbell velocity. Six healthy males (24.83±3.71years; 69.88±8.36kg; 175.92±4.5cm) participated in this studyand performed several sets on the bench press. Barbell concentric mean (MV) and peak (PV) velocity were recorded witha LT and the IMU. Pearson correlation coefficient shows a very high relationship for MV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.08 m/s; 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; p< 0.001) and PV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.13 m/s; 95%CI: 0.96-0.98; p< 0.001). There was a very high agreement for the values ofMV and PV (MV: ICC = 0.945, CI = 0.8340.974, α = 0.981; PV: ICC = 0.926, CI = 0.7080.969, α = 0.977). Paired sample t-testrevealed systematic bias for MV (p< 0.001; mean difference between instruments = 0.06 ± 0.09 m/s) and PV (p< 0.001; meandifference between instruments = 0.15 ± 0.18 m/s). Bland-Altman plots showed almost trivial and moderate relationships forMV (r2 = 0.1) and PV (r2 = 0.37). In conclusion, the PUSHTM Band 2.0 was proven to be a valid alternative for measuring barbellvelocity in the bench press.(AU)
El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la fiabilidad y validez de la nueva unidad de medición inercial (IMU) PUSHTM Band 2.0para medir la velocidad de la barra. Seis hombres sanos (24.83 ± 3.71 años; 69.88 ± 8.36 kg; 175.92 ± 4.5 cm) participaron eneste estudio y realizaron varias series en el press de banca. La velocidad concéntrica de barra (MV) y la velocidad pico (PV)se registraron con un LT y la IMU. El coeficiente de correlación de Pearson muestra una relación muy alta para MV (r = 0.97;SEE: 0.08 m/s; IC 95%: 0.95-0.98; p <0.001) y PV (r = 0.97; SEE: 0.13 m/s; 95% IC: 0,96-0,98; p <0,001). Hubo un acuerdo muyalto para los valores de MV y PV (MV: ICC = 0.945, CI = 0.8340.974, α = 0.981; PV: ICC = 0.926, CI = 0.7080.969, α = 0.977). Laprueba t de muestras relacionadas reveló un sesgo sistemático para MV (p <0.001; diferencia media entre instrumentos = 0.06± 0.09 m/s) y PV (p <0.001; diferencia media entre instrumentos = 0.15 ± 0.18 m/s). Las gráficas de Bland-Altman mostraronrelaciones casi triviales y moderadas para VM (r2 = 0.1) y VP (r2 = 0.37). En conclusión, se demostró que PUSHTM Band 2.0 esuna alternativa válida para medir la velocidad de la barra en el press de banca.(AU)