Persistence of antiphospholipid antibodies over time and its association with recurrence of clinical manifestations: A longitudinal study from a single centre.

PURPOSE: To analyze the antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) persistence over time in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and its association with clinical recurrence and to identify predictors of aPL persistence over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 200 patients with a diagnosis of APS and at least three follow-up aPL determinations were included. Persistent aPL profile was defined as the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) and/or IgG/IgM anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I (aß2GPI) (> 99th percentile) antibodies in at least 66% of follow-up measurements. Multilevel mixed-effect generalized linear models with logit link were used. RESULTS: 112 (56%) patients maintained persistent aPL profiles over time, while 88 (44%) were transient. Median follow-up time was 172.5 months. Follow-up time did not affect the odds of aPL persistence in multivariate analysis (p = 1.00). Baseline triple aPL positivity [OR 78 (95%CI 16.9-359.7, p < 0.001)] and double aPL positivity [OR = 7.6 (95%CI 3.7-15.7, p < 0.001)] correlated with persistent aPLs over time, while isolated LAC [OR = 0.26 (95% CI 0.08-0.49, p = 0.002)] or isolated IgG/IgM aCL [OR = 0.20 (95% CI 0.11-0.59, p = 0.004)] positivity, were predictors of transient aPL profile. Patients with persistent aPLs had higher rate of clinical recurrence in comparison to patients with transient aPLs [OR = 2.48 (95%CI 1.34-4.58, p = 0.003)]. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients with baseline medium-high titer aPL positivity had persistent positive aPLs over time. Patients with persistent aPLs were more prone to present recurrence of clinical manifestations. Multiple aPL positivity increased the odds of a persistent aPL profile over time, while isolated LAC and aCL positivity decreased it.

El ingreso urgente de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: situación actual / Urgent hospitalization of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the current situation

No disponible

The growing role of precision medicine for the treatment of autoimmune diseases; results of a systematic review of literature and Experts' Consensus.

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) share similar serological, clinical, and radiological findings, but, behind these common features, there are different pathogenic mechanisms, immune cells dysfunctions, and targeted organs. In this context, multiple lines of evidence suggest the application of precision medicine principles to AIDs to reduce the treatment failure. Precision medicine refers to the tailoring of therapeutic strategies to the individual characteristics of each patient, thus it could be a new approach for management of AIDS which considers individual variability in genes, environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Precision medicine would also assist physicians in choosing the right treatment, the best timing of administration, consequently trying to maximize drug efficacy, and, possibly, reducing adverse events. In this work, the growing body of evidence is summarized regarding the predictive factors for drug response in patients with AIDs, applying the precision medicine principles to provide high-quality evidence for therapeutic opportunities in improving the management of these patients.

The European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome (EUROAPS): A survey of 247 consecutive cases.

AIM: To analyse the clinical features, laboratory data, foetal-maternal outcomes, and follow-up in a cohort of 247 women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS). METHODS: The European Registry on APS became a Registry within the framework of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibody projects and placed on a website in June 2010. Cases with obstetric complaints related to aPL who tested positive for aPL prospectively and retrospectively were included. The three-year survey results are reported. RESULTS: 338 women with 1253 pregnancy episodes were included; 915 were historical and 338 were latest episodes. All these women tested positive for aPL. 247 of the 338 fulfilled the Sydney criteria. According to the laboratory categories, 84/247 were in category I, 42 in IIa, 66 in IIb and 55 in IIc. Obstetric complications other than foetal losses, appeared in 129 cases (52.2%). 192 (77.7%) had a live birth and 55 (22.3%) did not. The latter group of only 38 cases (69%) received adequate treatment and 17 (31%) did not. 177/247 (72%) women were put on heparin plus LDA. Thrombosis appeared in two during pregnancy and in 14 during the puerperium. 7 (3%) women evolved to complete SLE. CONCLUSIONS: OAPS shows differential characteristics than classical APS. All laboratory test categories are needed to avoid false-negative diagnoses. In some cases, complement levels could act as a serological marker. OAPS has very good foetal-maternal outcomes when treated. Thrombosis and progression to SLE in mothers with OAPS are scarce compared with "classical APS", suggesting that they have different aPL-mediated pathogenic mechanisms.

Discontinuation of anticoagulation or antiaggregation treatment may be safe in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome when antiphospholipid antibodies became persistently negative.

Recommended treatment for patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) after a thrombotic event is long-term anticoagulation. Few patients with APS and previously positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may become negative over time. It is still not exactly known how to treat these patients when aPL become persistently negative. We described the follow-up of 11 primary APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative and in whom thromboprophylaxis was discontinued. The primary end-point was the recurrence of thrombosis in patients with previous thrombotic event and a first thrombotic event in women with previous obstetric APS. Ten (90%) patients were female. Seven (64%) patients had a history of deep venous thrombosis, two of them with pulmonary embolism, and four (36%) women had recurrent miscarriage. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) was the aPL most frequently detected (82%). Two patients had both LAC and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies. No new thrombotic episode was observed after a median follow-up period of 20 months. Anticoagulation or antiaggregation could be discontinued in some peculiar patients with low-risk primary APS whose aPL become persistently negative. However, studies including a larger number of patients are required to confirm these results.