Polypharmacy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of polypharmacy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the extent of polypharmacy across patients with (different stages of) CKD, as well as the association with clinical outcomes remains unknown. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy in (different subgroups of) patients with CKD and assess the association between polypharmacy and patient-important outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until July 2022. Studies that reported the prevalence of polypharmacy, medication use, or pill burden in patients with CKD (including patients receiving dialysis and kidney transplant recipients) and their association with patient-important outcomes (i.e. mortality, kidney failure, quality of life, and medication non-adherence) were included. Two reviewers independently screened title and abstract and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled in a random-effects single-arm meta-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 127 studies were included (CKD 3-5 n=39, dialysis: n=38, kidney transplant n=13, different CKD stages n=37). The pooled prevalence of polypharmacy, based on 63 studies with 484,915 patients, across all patients with CKD was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76-86%) and the pooled mean number of prescribed medications 9.7 (95%CI: 8.4-11.0). The prevalence of polypharmacy was higher in patients who received dialysis or a kidney transplant compared to patients with CKD 3-5, but did not differ between studies with regards to region, or patients' mean age or sex. In patients with CKD, polypharmacy was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, kidney failure, faster eGFR decline, lower quality of life (QoL), and higher medication non-adherence, adverse drug reactions, and potentially inappropriate medications. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of polypharmacy in patients with CKD was over 80%, and highest in patients with a kidney transplant and those receiving dialysis. No causes of heterogeneity were identified, indicating that polypharmacy is an issue for all patients with CKD. Polypharmacy is associated with worse clinical outcomes, lower QoL, and medication-related problems in patients with CKD.

Representation of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Disease Medications: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, but their systematic underrepresentation in cardiovascular randomized clinical trials (RCTs) limits the generation of appropriate evidence to guide cardiovascular risk management (CVRM). Objective: To evaluate the underrepresentation of patients with CKD in cardiovascular RCTs, and to highlight evidence gaps in CVRM medications in this population. Evidence Review: A systematic search was conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov from February 2000 through October 2021 for RCTs with full-text publications. If no full-text publications were found in ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar were also searched. Eligible RCTs were those evaluating the effectiveness of antiplatelets, anticoagulants, blood pressure-lowering drugs, glucose-lowering drugs, or cholesterol-lowering drugs in adults with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Trials with a sample size of fewer than 100 patients were excluded. Findings: In total, 1194 RCTs involving 2 207 677 participants (mean [SD] age, 63 [6] years; 1 343 970 males [64%]) were included. Since 2000, the percentage of cardiovascular RCTs excluding patients with CKD has increased from 66% to 79% (74% overall [884 RCTs]). In 864 RCTs (72%), more patients were excluded than anticipated on safety grounds (63% [306] of trials required no dose adjustment, and 79% [561] required dose adjustment). In total, 158 RCTs (13%) reported results for patients with CKD separately (eg, in subgroup analyses). Significant evidence gaps exist in most CVRM interventions for patients with CKD, particularly for those with CKD stages 4 to 5. Twenty-three RCTs (2%) reported results for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15 RCTs (1%) reported for patients receiving dialysis, and 1 RCT (0.1%) reported for recipients of kidney transplant. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this systematic review suggest that representation of patients with CKD in cardiovascular RCTs has not improved in the past 2 decades and that these RCTs excluded more patients with CKD than expected on safety grounds. Lack of reporting or underreporting of results for this patient population is associated with evidence gaps in the effectiveness of most CVRM medications in patients with all stages of CKD, particularly CKD stages 4 to 5.

Both clinical trial register and electronic bibliographic database searches were needed to identify randomized clinical trials for systematic reviews: an evaluation study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether clinical trial register (CTR) searches can accurately identify a greater number of completed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) than electronic bibliographic database (EBD) searches for systematic reviews of interventions, and to quantify the number of eligible ongoing trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed an evaluation study and based our search for RCTs on the eligibility criteria of a systematic review that focused on the underrepresentation of people with chronic kidney disease in cardiovascular RCTs. We conducted a combined search of ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify eligible RCTs registered up to June 1, 2023. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for publications of eligible RCTs published up to June 5, 2023. Finally, we compared the search results to determine the extent to which the two sources identified the same RCTs. RESULTS: We included 92 completed RCTs. Of these, 81 had results available. Sixty-six completed RCTs with available results were identified by both sources (81% agreement [95% CI: 71-88]). We identified seven completed RCTs with results exclusively by CTR search (9% [95% CI: 4-17]) and eight exclusively by EBD search (10% [95% CI: 5-18]). Eleven RCTs were completed but lacked results (four identified by both sources (36% [95% CI: 15-65]), one exclusively by EBD search (9% [95% CI: 1-38]), and six exclusively by CTR search (55% [95% CI: 28-79])). Also, we identified 42 eligible ongoing RCTs: 16 by both sources (38% [95% CI: 25-53]) and 26 exclusively by CTR search (62% [95% CI: 47-75]). Lastly, we identified four RCTs of unknown status by both sources. CONCLUSION: CTR searches identify a greater number of completed RCTs than EBD searches. Both searches missed some included RCTs. Based on our case study, researchers (eg, information specialists, systematic reviewers) aiming to identify all available RCTs should continue to search both sources. Once the barriers to performing CTR searches alone are targeted, CTR searches may be a suitable alternative.

Polypharmacy and Quality of Life Among Dialysis Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: Almost all patients who receive dialysis experience polypharmacy, but little is known about their experiences with medication or perceptions toward it. In this qualitative study, we aimed to gain insight into dialysis patients' experiences with polypharmacy, the ways they integrate their medication into their daily lives, and the ways it affects their quality of life. Study Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Setting & Participants: Patients who received dialysis from 2 Dutch university hospitals. Analytical Approach: Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed independently by 2 researchers through thematic content analysis. Results: Overall, 28 individuals were interviewed (29% women, mean age 63 ± 16 years, median dialysis vintage 25.5 [interquartile range, 15-48] months, mean daily number of medications 10 ± 3). Important themes were as follows: (1) their own definition of what constitutes "medication," (2) their perception of medication, (3) medication routines and their impact on daily (quality of) life, and (4) interactions with health care professionals and others regarding medication. Participants generally perceived medication as burdensome but less so than dialysis. Medication was accepted as an essential precondition for their health, although participants did not always notice these health benefits directly. Medication routines and other coping mechanisms helped participants reduce the perceived negative effects of medication. In fact, medication increased freedom for some participants. Participants generally had constructive relationships with their physicians when discussing their medication. Limitations: Results are context dependent and might therefore not apply directly to other contexts. Conclusions: Polypharmacy negatively affected dialysis patients' quality of life, but these effects were overshadowed by the burden of dialysis. The patients' realization that medication is important to their health and effective coping strategies mitigated the negative impact of polypharmacy on their quality of life. Physicians and patients should work together continuously to evaluate the impact of treatments on health and other aspects of patients' daily lives. Plain-Language Summary: People receiving dialysis treatment are prescribed a large number of medications (polypharmacy). Polypharmacy is associated with a number of issues, including a lower health-related quality of life. In this study we interviewed patients who received dialysis treatment to understand how they experience polypharmacy in the context of their daily lives. Participants generally perceived medication as burdensome but less so than dialysis and accepted medication as an essential precondition for their health. Medication routines and other coping mechanisms helped participants mitigate the perceived negative effects of medication. In fact, medication led to increased freedom for some participants. Participants had generally constructive relationships with their physicians when discussing their medication but felt that physicians sometimes do not understand them.

Evidence for pharmacological interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk for patients with chronic kidney disease: a study protocol of an evidence map.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require a personalised strategy for cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) to reduce their high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite their high risk, patients with CKD appear to be underrepresented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for pharmacological CVRM interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk (pharmacological CVRM interventions). As a result, it remains unclear whether the efficacy of these interventions found in patients without CKD is similarly applicable to patients with CKD. This evidence map aims to provide an overview of the availability of the evidence from pharmacological CVRM trials for patients with CKD by assessing how often patients with reduced kidney function are specifically excluded or included from RCTs on pharmacological CVRM interventions and whether studies report efficacy estimates of interventions specifically for kidney patients. METHODS: We will perform a systematic literature search in ClinicalTrials.gov to identify relevant planned, ongoing, and completed RCTs on a broad range of CVRM medications after which we will retrieve the published protocols and papers via ClinicalTrials.gov itself, Embase, MEDLINE, or Google Scholar. We will include RCTs that investigate the efficacy of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, glucose-lowering medication, and lipid-lowering medication on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and end-stage kidney disease in patients with a cardiovascular history or a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Two reviewers will independently screen trial records and their corresponding full-text publications to determine eligibility and extract data. Outcomes of interest are the exclusion of patients with reduced kidney function from RCTs and whether the study population was restricted to kidney patients or subgroup analyses were performed on kidney function. Results will be visualised in an evidence map. DISCUSSION: The availability of evidence on the efficacy and safety of pharmacological CVRM interventions in patients with CKD might be limited. Hence, we will identify knowledge gaps for future research. At the same time, the availability of evidence, or lack thereof, might warrant caution from healthcare decision-makers in making strong recommendations based on the extrapolation of results from studies to patients who were explicitly excluded from participation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022296746.

Impact of phosphate binders on quality of life in dialysis patients: Results from the prospective Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Phosphate binders cause high pill burden for dialysis patients, complicate medication regimens, and have unpleasant taste and large size which may affect patients' quality of life. This study explores the association between phosphate binder pill burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional multi-centre cohort study in 21 Dutch dialysis centres. Phosphate binder pill burden was extracted from electronic patient records. Primary outcome was HRQoL measured with the Short Form 12 physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS). Secondary endpoints were severity of gastro-intestinal symptoms, itching, dry mouth, and mental health symptoms, measured with the Dialysis Symptom Index. RESULTS: Of 388 included patients, aged 62 ± 16 years, 77% underwent haemodialysis. PCS scores were comparable for patients with and without phosphate binders. Patients using 1-3 pills reported lower scores for decreased appetite (ß -0.5; 95%CI -0.9 to -0.2), implying better appetite, than patients without phosphate binders. Patients using 4-6 pills also reported lower scores for decreased appetite (ß -0.5; 95%CI -0.8 to -0.1) and for itching (ß -0.5; 95%CI -0.9 to -0.1). Patients using >6 pills reported lower MCS (ß -2.9; 95%CI -6.2-0.4) and higher scores for feeling nervous (ß 0.6; 95%CI 0.1-1.1) and feeling sad (ß 0.4; 95%CI 0.0-0.9). CONCLUSION: Phosphate binder pill burden is not associated with physical quality of life. A higher pill burden is associated with better appetite and less itching. Patients using >6 pills per day report lower mental quality of life and felt nervous and sad more often.

Impact of Polypharmacy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Dialysis patients are often prescribed a large number of medications to improve metabolic control and manage coexisting comorbidities. However, some studies suggest that a large number of medications could also detrimentally affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, this study aims to provide insight in the association between the number of types of medications and HRQoL in dialysis patients. METHODS: A multicentre cohort study was conducted among dialysis patients from Dutch dialysis centres 3 months after initiation of dialysis as part of the ongoing prospective DOMESTICO study. The number of types of medications, defined as the number of concomitantly prescribed types of drugs, was obtained from electronic patient records. Primary outcome was HRQoL measured with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (range 0-100) of the Short Form 12. Secondary outcomes were number of symptoms (range 0-30) measured with the Dialysis Symptoms Index and self-rated health (range 0-100) measured with the EuroQol-5D-5L. Data were analysed using linear regression and adjusted for possible confounders, including comorbidity. Analyses for MCS and number of symptoms were performed after categorizing patients in tertiles according to their number of medications because assumptions of linearity were violated for these outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included. Mean age of patients was 58 ± 17 years, 35% were female, and 80% underwent haemodialysis. The mean number of medications was 12.2 ± 4.5. Mean PCS and MCS were 36.6 ± 10.2 and 46.8 ± 10.0, respectively. The mean number of symptoms was 12.3 ± 6.9 and the mean self-rated health 60.1 ± 20.6. In adjusted analyses, PCS was 0.6 point lower for each additional medication (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.9 to -0.2; p = 0.002). MCS was 4.9 point lower (95% CI: -8.8 to -1.0; p = 0.01) and 1.0 point lower (95% CI: -5.1-3.1; p = 0.63) for the highest and middle tertiles of medications, respectively, than for the lowest tertile. Patients in the highest tertile of medications reported 4.1 more symptoms than in the lowest tertile (95% CI: 1.5-6.6; p = 0.002), but no significant difference in the number of symptoms was observed between the middle and lowest tertiles. Self-rated health was 1.5 point lower for each medication (95% CI: -2.2 to -0.7; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: After adjustment for comorbidity and other confounders, a higher number of medications were associated with a lower PCS, MCS, and self-rated health in dialysis patients and with more symptoms.