Video-Based Assessment of Microsurgical Trainees: An Evaluation of Gender Bias.

BACKGROUND: Gender bias in graduate medical evaluations remains a challenging issue. This study evaluates implicit gender bias in video-based evaluations of microsurgical technique, which has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: Two videos were recorded of microsurgical anastomosis; the first was performed by a hand/microsurgery fellow and the second by an expert microsurgeon. A total of 150 surgeons with microsurgical experience were recruited to evaluate the videos; they were told these videos depicted a surgical trainee 1 month into fellowship followed by the same trainee 10 months later. The only variable was the name ("Rachel" or "David") that each participant was randomly assigned to evaluate. Participants were asked to score each video for quality, technique, efficiency, as well as overall progression and development after the second video compared with the initial video. To focus on bias, these outcome measures were selected to be purposefully subjective and all ratings were based on a subjective 1to 10 scale (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The analysis included 150 participants (75% male). There were no statistically significant differences in scores between the "female" and "male" trainee. The trainees received the same median initial (1-month video) and final (11th-month video) scores for all criteria except initial technique, in which the female trainee received a 7 and the male trainee received an 8. Notably, 11-month scores were consistently the same or lower than 1-month scores for both study groups (p < 0.001). There were also no differences within either study group based on participant sex. Microsurgery practitioners overall rated both groups lower than those who do not currently practice microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify a gender bias in this evaluation method. Further investigation into how we assess and grade trainees as well as the presence and impact of implicit biases on varying surgical assessment methods is warranted.

The Treatment of Complex Extremity Wounds Using External Tissue Expansion: A Case Series.

SUMMARY: The goal of wound reconstruction is the approximation of soft tissue and re-establishment of an acceptable appearance with minimal risk of complications. For large wound closure in the extremities, skin graft and flap reconstruction are common treatments but are associated with a variety of complications. Comparatively, tissue expansion can provide the opportunity to reconstruct large wounds with native, durable, and sensate tissue without significant donor site morbidity. External tissue expansion is less invasive and avoids complications associated with internal expansion. The authors treated 11 patients with varying extremity wound types and sizes with an external tissue expansion device. Patient age ranged from 18 to 68 years with an average age of 43.7 years (SD, ± 13.1 years). Average wound surface area was approximately 235 cm 2 (SD, ± 135.3 cm 2 ). Devices were affixed and left for 7 to 11 days before closure of the wounds. Outcomes were assessed at 2 to 36 weeks postoperative follow-up. All wounds were fully closed after treatment without need for secondary reconstructive procedures. No patient experienced major complications. All patients demonstrated intact sensation within the area of reconstruction equivalent to surrounding tissues. External tissue expansion, an excellent treatment option in extremity reconstruction, is efficacious and associated with lower complication rates compared with internal tissue expansion, skin grafts, and flap reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

External Tissue Expansion in Complex Extremity Reconstruction.

Skin grafting and flap-based reconstruction have been the conventional treatments for complex extremity wounds. However, these methods can be associated with relatively high complication rates and involve increasing levels of complexity. External tissue expansion has recently emerged as an attractive alternative to its conventional counterparts. It is a technically simple and low-morbidity technique for complex wound reconstruction. This article provides a review of internal and external tissue expansion with a focus on the evolution, indications, and recent successes of external expansion for soft tissue coverage.

The Impact of Dividing the Flexor Tendon Pulleys on Tendon Excursion and Work of Flexion in a Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: The A2 and A4 pulleys of the flexor tendon system have traditionally been considered critical components of efficient digital flexion. This dogma has recently been challenged. Using fresh human cadaveric hands and a model to measure force and excursion, we sought to clarify the clinical importance of releasing different pulleys. METHODS: Combinations of A1, A2, and A4 pulleys were released on the index, middle, ring, and little fingers of fresh, cadaveric hands. The excursion was measured as the distance the tendon was pulled by the motor to achieve palm touchdown. The force applied by the motor was constant (25 N); work was derived from the product of force and excursion (distance). The change in excursion and work needed to achieve palm touchdown before and after pulley release was measured. Excursion varies among digits and specimens at baseline; therefore, the percentage change from the intact state was used to compare groups. We compared A2 versus A1, A4 versus A1, A4 versus A2, A1 + A2 versus A2, and A1 + A4 versus A4. RESULTS: Isolated A2 or A4 release had the greatest individual impact on the excursion (4.77% ± 1.52% and 3.88% ± 1.93%, respectively). When A1 was released with A2 (9.90% ± 2.52%), the additional impact on the excursion was significant; however, when A1 was released with A4 (2.63% ± 2.81%), the impact was marginal. No clinically or statistically significant change in the work of flexion was detected. CONCLUSIONS: A1 release was clinically significant when added to A2 release but not when added to A4 release. Sacrifice of the A2 and A4 pulleys resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, difference in flexor tendon excursion. These data suggest that the A1 pulley should be preserved when other proximal pulley components are likely to be compromised. These data also add further support to the concept that the A2 pulley or the A4 pulley can be released as needed for optimal tenorrhaphy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During flexor tendon repair, the length of contiguous pulley release may have more impact on final tendon excursion than which specific pulleys are released.

The Effects of Capitate Height Alteration on Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability.

Question/Purpose Carpal kinematics may be influenced by the manipulation of carpal dimensions. This may provide a surgical alternative to unpredictable soft tissue reconstruction for scapholunate dissociation. The purpose of this study was to determine if altering capitate height can correct dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI). Materials and Methods Five cadaveric wrists had baseline radiolunate (RL) angles and scapholunate (SL) intervals measured fluoroscopically, confirming no baseline DISI. We simulated open- and clenched-fist testing via a constant load of the wrist extensors and sequential loading of the digital flexors. We confirmed no baseline static/dynamic DISI. The SL ligament and secondary stabilizers (scapho-trapezio-trapezoid [STT] and dorsal intercarpal ligaments) were transected. Repeat loading and fluoroscopic measurements confirmed creation of static DISI. Capitate height was altered in three interventions: 2 mm shortening osteotomy of capitate waist, 7 mm shortening osteotomy of capitate waist, and 2 mm lengthening of original capitate height by insertion of a spacer at capitate waist. The osteotomized capitate was stabilized with a Kirschner wire; RL angles and SL intervals were measured via fluoroscopy during open- and clenched-fist testing. Primary and secondary outcomes were change in RL angle and SL interval, from the DISI stage to each capitate shortening and lengthening stage. Results SL ligament and secondary stabilizers sectioning created a DISI pattern, with abnormal RL angles (>15°) and widened SL intervals. Neither capitate shortening nor overexpansion corrected RL angles or SL intervals in any DISI-induced wrists. Conclusions Under the conditions studied, isolated capitate shortening or lengthening did not correct radiographic DISI posturing of the lunate following sectioning of the SL and STT interosseous ligaments. Further study of carpal kinematics with more substantial bone changes and loading of adjacent joints may be beneficial. Clinical relevance Surgeons performing capitate shortening osteotomy in isolation should not expect to improve DISI.