Health Related Quality of Life and Psychopathological Symptoms in People with Hemophilia, Bloodborne Co-Infections and Comorbidities: An Italian Multicenter Observational Study.

Background: The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with hemophilia (PWH) is an important issue, especially considering people suffering from chronic diseases beyond hemophilia. The principal aim of this study was to investigate the presence and relevance of psychological symptoms, both internalizing and externalizing, lifestyle, and HRQoL in a group of Italian PWH with chronic bloodborne co-infections and comorbidities. Furthermore, the research describes the association between psychological aspects and the impact of disease-related characteristics (type of hemophilia, presence of co-infections, and comorbidities) on them. Methods: Seventy patients (mean age 46.77±11.3), 64 with severe hemophilia A (Factor VIII: C < 1 IU/dL) and 6 with severe hemophilia B (Factor IX <1 IU/dL), were consecutively recruited from seven Hemophilia Centers in Italy of Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE). In order to assess psychological symptoms, HRQoL, and lifestyle, three psychological questionnaires were administered (the SCL-90-R, SF-36, and PSQ, respectively). Results: A general decline in the quality of life and an increase in the tendency to adopt a lifestyle characterized by hyperactivity emerged. Inverse correlations were found between HRQoL and psychological distress. Although the SCL-90-R did not reveal symptoms above the clinical cut-off, co-infections significantly increased anxiety, depression, somatizations, paranoia, and social withdrawal. Lastly, HRQoL is impaired by co-infections as well as comorbidities. Conclusion: Our preliminary results must be confirmed to deepen the findings between mental health and hemophilia.

Emergency management in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on prophylaxis with emicizumab: AICE practical guidance in collaboration with SIBioC, SIMEU, SIMEUP, SIPMeL and SISET.

Emicizumab has been approved in several countries for regular prophylaxis in patients with congenital haemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors because it substantially reduces their bleeding risk and improves quality of life. However, although significantly less frequent, some breakthrough bleeds may still occur while on emicizumab, requiring treatment with bypassing or other haemostatic agents. Thrombotic complications have been reported with the associated use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. In addition, when surgery/invasive procedures are needed while on emicizumab, their management requires multidisciplinary competences and direct supervision by experts in the use of this agent. Given this, and in order to expand the current knowledge on the use of emicizumab and concomitant haemostatic agents, and reduce the risk of complications in this setting, the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) here provides guidance on the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery in emergency situations in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. This paper has been shared with other National Scientific Societies involved in the field.

Status of Recombinant Factor VIII Concentrate Treatment for Hemophilia a in Italy: Characteristics and Clinical Benefits.

The current interest in recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products stems from the fact that they offer a technological solution to prolonging the half-life of and reducing the risk of formation of alloantibodies (inhibitors) against FVIII in treated patients with hemophilia A (HA). The Italian health care system has authorized the use of a wide range of rFVIII concentrates of the first, second, and third generation, as well as new innovative rFVIII preparates with an extended half-life (EHL) (Kogenate FS®-Bayer, belonging to the second generation and replaced since 2017 by a product consisting of the same modified molecule; because it is only available until the end of the current year, it will not be considered in this review). Some of these products have unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, including an EHL. The first-generation full-length rFVIII (FL-rFVIII), octocog alfa (Recombinate® Baxter/BIOVIIIx), although the oldest rFVIII product, has several desirable features. Third-generation products include two modified octocog alfa molecules (Advate®, Shire; Kovaltry®, Bayer) as well as the B domain-deleted rFVIII (BDD-rFVIII) moroctocog alfa (ReFacto®-Pfizer). The B domain-truncated (BDT-rFVIII) turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®, Novo Nordisk), the BDD-rFVIII simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®, Kedrion), the single-chain BDT-rVIII lonoctocog alfa (Afstyla®, CSL Behring), and the BDD-rFVIIIFc efmoroctocog alfa (Elocta®, Sobi-Biogen) are new, innovative products. Simoctocog alfa, because its peculiarities, is considered a fourth-generation rFVIII concentrate. Turoctocog alfa, simoctocog alfa, and lonoctocog alfa have a high affinity for von Willebrand factor (vWF) that reduces renal clearance and prolongs the half-life of rFVIII. Efmoroctocog alfa, a first-in-class rFVIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), has a half-life 1.5-1.8 times longer than that of conventional plasma-derived FVIII (pd-rFVIII) and other rFVIII products. Clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy, safety, and inhibitor development of all these innovative concentrates in both previously treated (PTPs) and untreated patients (PUPs). This review considers the rFVIII products that are indicated for the treatment of patients with severe HA, focusing on those that are commercially available in Italy. Their PK characteristics, immunogenicity, and clinical benefits are discussed and compared.

Use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: one-year follow-up experience in an Italian centre.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been shown to be non-inferior to traditional vitamin K antagonists in preventing stroke and arterial thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, it is mandatory to record side effects and individual adherence to DOAC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-centre experience, patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were prospectively observed after switching from a vitamin K antagonist to dabigatran or rivaroxaban. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the novel treatment, and adherence to it, were evaluated over a period of 1 year. Clinical data were integrated with records of haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic complications. All the subjects were given an anonymous self-report questionnaire on the degree of their adherence/satisfaction with the treatment. RESULTS: Of 196 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (median age, 78.5 years) who switched from a vitamin K antagonist to DOAC, 178 completed the 1-year follow up, of whom 87 were given dabigatran and 91 rivaroxaban. The efficacy of the two DOAC was similar. Patients given dabigatran had a higher frequency (n=32) of non-haemorrhagic complications (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.7-7.8), which occurred earlier (HR: 6.1; 95% CI: 3.0-12.6) than those (n=7) recorded in subjects on rivaroxaban. The degree of satisfaction with therapy was higher among patients on rivaroxaban (mean score 9.1, SD 1.0) than among those on dabigatran (mean score 8.7; SD 0.9; p=0.01). DISCUSSION: Overall, in this experience, DOAC were shown to be effective, safe alternatives to vitamin K antagonists. Nevertheless, compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran resulted in a higher rate and earlier occurrence of non-haemorrhagic events, and a lower satisfaction score.

Successful use of rivaroxaban in postoperative deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb following instability with warfarin: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical trials shows rivaroxaban to be effective for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Switching to rivaroxaban following failure of indirect anticoagulants in deep vein thrombosis has not been demonstrated in a real-life setting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old white woman was switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban for the treatment of thrombosis of her right common femoral vein after saphenectomy. The reason for the switch was due to the instability of anti-coagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists over a period of 3 months during which she did not reach the "therapeutic range" of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio. The ineffectiveness of the conventional oral anticoagulant was confirmed by persistence of moderate-high values of fibrin D dimers (780 ng/ml) and by residual vein thrombosis at an ultrasound examination. Objectively, her right leg appeared to be still edematous and warm and pain was elicited by deep palpation. Rivaroxaban was administered after warfarin discontinuation (prothrombin time-international normalized ratio = 1.43) at a dosage of 15 mg every 12 hours for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 3 months. After this period, her objective symptoms significantly improved, with reduction of edema of her lower limb and pain relief. Her fibrin D dimer values returned to normal (210 ng/ml). An ultrasound showed recanalization of the obstructed venous segment. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report, a switch to rivaroxaban from warfarin was shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of postoperative deep vein thrombosis, whereas standard oral anticoagulation therapy, which required dose adjustments over a period of 3 months, was not able to stabilize the therapeutic range of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio nor improve our patient's outcome.