Asunto(s)
Médicos Graduados Extranjeros , Licencia Médica , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Internado y ResidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The start of a new academic year in graduate medical education will mark a transition for postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents from medical school into residency. The relocation of individuals has significant implications given the COVID-19 pandemic and variability of the outbreak across the United States, but little is known about the extent of the geographic relocation taking place. OBJECTIVE: We reported historical trends of PGY-1 residents staying in-state and those starting residency from out-of-state to quantify the geographic movement of individuals beginning residency training each year. METHODS: We analyzed historical data collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in academic years 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019, comparing the locations of medical school and residency programs for PGY-1 residents to determine the number of matriculants from in-state medical schools and out-of-state medical schools. International medical school graduates (IMGs) were shown separately in the analysis and then combined with out-of-state matriculants. US citizens who trained abroad were counted among IMGs. RESULTS: The total number of PGY-1s increased by 10.3% during the 3-year time period, from 29 338 to 32 348. When combined, IMGs and USMGs transitioning from one state or country to another state accounted for approximately 72% of PGY-1s each year. Approximately 63% of USMGs matriculated to a residency program in a new state, and IMGs made up 24.6% to 23.1% of PGY-1s over the 3-year period. CONCLUSIONS: Each year brings a substantial amount of movement among PGY-1s that highlights the need for policies and procedures specific to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Internado y Residencia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Educación Médica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Médicos Graduados Extranjeros , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
Simulation has become an integral part of physician education, and abundant evidence confirms that simulation-based education improves learners' skills and behaviors and is associated with improved patient outcomes. The resources required to implement simulation-based education, however, have led some stakeholders to question the overall value proposition of simulation-based education. This paper summarizes the information from a special panel on this topic and defines research priorities for the field. Future work should focus on both outcomes and costs, with robust measurement of resource investments, provider performance (in both simulation and real settings), patient outcomes, and impact on the health care organization. Increased attention to training practicing clinicians and health care teams is also essential. Clarifying the value proposition of simulation-based education will require a major national effort with funding from multiple sponsors and active engagement of a variety of stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/métodos , Cirugía General/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Competencia Clínica , Educación Médica/economía , Educación Médica/normas , Cirugía General/economía , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Investigación , Entrenamiento Simulado/economía , Entrenamiento Simulado/normas , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Consejo Directivo/organización & administración , Convenios Médico-Hospital/organización & administración , Relaciones Médico-Hospital , Humanos , Liderazgo , Rol del Médico , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de SaludAsunto(s)
Consejo Directivo , Administradores de Hospital , Responsabilidad Social , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies demonstrating that central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are preventable prompted a national initiative to reduce the incidence of these infections. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative cohort study to evaluate the impact of the national "On the CUSP: Stop BSI" program on CLABSI rates among participating adult intensive care units (ICUs). The program goal was to achieve a unit-level mean CLABSI rate of less than 1 case per 1,000 catheter-days using standardized definitions from the National Healthcare Safety Network. Multilevel Poisson regression modeling compared infection rates before, during, and up to 18 months after the intervention was implemented. RESULTS: A total of 1,071 ICUs from 44 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, reporting 27,153 ICU-months and 4,454,324 catheter-days of data, were included in the analysis. The overall mean CLABSI rate significantly decreased from 1.96 cases per 1,000 catheter-days at baseline to 1.15 at 16-18 months after implementation. CLABSI rates decreased during all observation periods compared with baseline, with adjusted incidence rate ratios steadily decreasing to 0.57 (95% confidence intervals, 0.50-0.65) at 16-18 months after implementation. CONCLUSION: Coincident with the implementation of the national "On the CUSP: Stop BSI" program was a significant and sustained decrease in CLABSIs among a large and diverse cohort of ICUs, demonstrating an overall 43% decrease and suggesting the majority of ICUs in the United States can achieve additional reductions in CLABSI rates.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Adulto , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Dr. Combes is senior vice president at the American Hospital Association (AHA) and president and COO of the Center for Healthcare Governance. The Interview with Dr. John Combes on Boards and Governance provides a perspective on key changes, issues, competencies, and metrics that hospital boards must address. The role of quality professionals to be effective with boards is also described.