Cosmetic Outcomes of Simple Pediatric Facial Lacerations Repaired With Skin Adhesive Compared With Skin Adhesive With Underlying Adhesive Strips: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare 2 methods of repairing simple pediatric facial lacerations. We hypothesized that wounds repaired with skin adhesive and underlying adhesive strips compared with skin adhesive alone would be superior in regard to cosmetic outcome. METHODS: Patients aged younger than 18 years presenting to the emergency department with simple facial lacerations requiring repair were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned to repair with either skin adhesive alone or skin adhesive with underlying adhesive strips. Families were contacted by phone 1 week after enrollment to discuss short-term complications. The cosmetic appearance of photographs of the scars at 2 months was analyzed using a visual analog scale by a blinded pediatric emergency physician and pediatric plastic surgeon. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were enrolled, with 92 returning for the 2-month follow-up. The visual analog scale scores for the skin adhesive with adhesive strips group were similar to the skin adhesive alone group (60 mm vs 58 mm, P = 0.540). Spearman ρ correlation coefficient between the raters was 0.669, indicating strong agreement. There was no significant difference in rates of return visits, wound dehiscence, or infection. The skin adhesive with adhesive strips group had a longer time to perform the repair (195 seconds vs 107 seconds, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using adhesive strips to first approximate a wound before applying skin adhesive leads to a similar cosmetic outcome compared with simple facial lacerations repaired with skin adhesive alone. Although the study showed longer time to complete the repair, this approach may still be useful in settings where approximation is difficult to obtain manually.

Advanced Three-Dimensional Technologies in Craniofacial Reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the evolution of three-dimensional computer-aided reconstruction and its current applications in craniofacial surgery. 2. Recapitulate virtual surgical planning, or computer-assisted surgical simulation, workflow in craniofacial surgery. 3. Summarize the principles of computer-aided design techniques, such as mirror-imaging and postoperative verification of results. 4. Report the capabilities of computer-aided manufacturing, such as rapid prototyping of three-dimensional models and patient-specific custom implants. 5. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using three-dimensional technology in craniofacial surgery. 6. Critique evidence on advanced three-dimensional technology in craniofacial surgery and identify opportunities for future investigation. SUMMARY: Increasingly used in craniofacial surgery, virtual surgical planning is applied to analyze and simulate surgical interventions. Computer-aided design and manufacturing generates models, cutting guides, and custom implants for use in craniofacial surgery. Three-dimensional computer-aided reconstruction may improve results, increase safety, enhance efficiency, augment surgical education, and aid surgeons' ability to execute complex craniofacial operations. Subtopics include image analysis, surgical planning, virtual simulation, custom guides, model or implant generation, and verification of results. Clinical settings for the use of modern three-dimensional technologies include acquired and congenital conditions in both the acute and the elective settings. The aim of these techniques is to achieve superior functional and aesthetic outcomes compared to conventional surgery. Surgeons should understand this evolving technology, its indications, limitations, and future direction to use it optimally for patient care. This article summarizes advanced three-dimensional techniques in craniofacial surgery with cases highlighting clinical concepts.

Le fort I maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis.

Treatment of maxillary hypoplasia has traditionally involved conventional Le Fort I osteotomies and advancement. Advancements of greater than 10 mm risk significant relapse. This risk is greater in the cleft lip and palate population, whose anatomy and soft tissue scarring from prior procedures contributes to instability of conventional maxillary advancement. Le Fort I advancement with distraction osteogenesis has emerged as viable, stable treatment modality correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia in cleft, syndromic, and noncleft patients. In this article, the authors provide a review of current data and recommendations concerning Le Fort I advancement with distraction osteogenesis. In addition, they outline their technique for treating severe maxillary hypoplasia with distraction osteogenesis using internal devices.

Comparison of vertical and oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for pelvic, perineal, and groin reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Wound complications after perineal and groin obliterative procedures are a significant cause of morbidity, particularly following chemoradiation therapy. Vertical and, increasingly, oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps have been used to fill potential dead space and bring healthy, vascularized tissue into the defect. The authors compared the complications and outcomes of patients undergoing perineal or groin reconstruction with vertical or oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. They hypothesized that the oblique flap offers outcomes similar to those of the vertical flap, without an increased risk of complications. METHODS: All patients who underwent immediate reconstruction of perineal, pelvic, or groin defects using vertical (n=49) or oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (n=22) flaps over the past 10 years at the University of Washington Medical Center were reviewed retrospectively. Patient, disease, and obliterative procedure characteristics and donor- and recipient-site complications were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in major or minor donor- or recipient-site complication rates, need for augmented fascial closure, need for additional flaps, flap loss, readmission, or reoperation rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate reconstruction of perineal or groin defects with oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps results in complication rates similar to those with reconstruction using with vertical flaps. Oblique flap reconstruction is a reasonable and safe alternative, providing several distinct advantages over the vertical flap, including greater arc of rotation, thinner skin paddle, less bulk, and limited fascial harvest. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Resorption of PDLLA plates as a nidus for recurrent langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Resorbable plating systems have been adapted into routine use for craniofacial reconstruction in children. After implantation in some patients, the area around the plates can develop palpable and visible fibrous capsules, with underlying bone resorption and a significant foreign-body giant cell reaction. The reaction is usually self-limited. We report a case in which Langerhans cell histiocytosis was resected, and then recurred at the sites of resorbing plate and screw placement in association with a foreign-body giant cell reaction.