Adaptation of a bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication framework by community-engaged research partnerships in rural Mississippi during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Community engagement is important for reaching populations at risk for health inequities in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A community-engaged risk communication intervention implemented by a community-engaged research partnership in Southeast Minnesota to address COVID-19 prevention, testing, and socioeconomic impacts has demonstrated high acceptability, feasibility, perceived efficacy, and sustainability. In this study, we describe the adaptation of the intervention by a community-academic partnership with rural African American populations in three Mississippi counties with high COVID-19 disparities. Intervention reach was assessed by the number of messages delivered by Communication Leaders to members of their social networks. Perceived scalability of the intervention was assessed by the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Bidirectional communication between Communication Leaders and community members within their social networks was used by the partnership to refine messages, meet resource needs, and advise statewide decision-makers. In the first 3 months, more than 8482 individuals were reached in the three counties. The intervention was deemed to be highly scalable by partnership members. Adaptation of a community-engaged pandemic CERC intervention is feasible and scalable, and it has the potential to reduce COVID-19 inequities across heterogeneous populations. This approach may be incorporated into current and future pandemic preparedness policies for community engagement.

Living through their first pandemic: Mississippi young adults reveal COVID-19 concerns and challenges.

Objective: The study aimed to understand the perceptions, knowledge, information sources, and coping skills pertaining to COVID-19 among two groups of African American young adults. Participants: African American ages 18-29 years enrolled in Historically Black Colleges and Universities and non-college enrolled young adults in Mississippi were the participants. Methods: Focus groups were conducted from February through May 2021. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Findings suggest the college students faced anxiety and stress from the loss of loved ones and the college experience. Non-college enrolled young adults dealt with maintaining employment, pros and cons of taking the vaccine to continue work, and handling the frequent flow of information. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of ensuring that reliable and trustworthy health promotion and health crisis prevention information, resources, and coping tools are available in the environments in which young adults live, learn, and work.

Isolation in Parents and Providers of Children With Chronic Critical Illness.

OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of children with medical complexity spend months or more in PICUs, lending to isolation for their parents and providers. We sought to better describe the experiences of parents and providers of children with chronic critical illness specifically around isolation during PICU admission. DESIGN: In-person interviews and surveys of pediatric critical care providers and parents of children with chronic critical illness. Interview transcripts were analyzed for themes. SETTING: Academic institution; PICU. SUBJECTS: Seven PICU physicians, eight nurse practitioners, and 12 parents of children with chronic critical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Surveys and semi-structured interviews. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PICU providers acknowledge feeling medically isolated from children with chronic critical illness, fueled by a lack of chronic critical illness training and burnout. Providers also perceive medical isolation in parents of children with chronic critical illness manifesting as a declining level of parental engagement. Parents did not feel medically isolated in our study. Providers also perceive social isolation in families of children with chronic critical illness, identifying the child's protracted disease and lack of tangible support systems as contributing factors. Parents self-reported adequate social supports but scored high on depression scales suggesting a disconnect between perceived and actual support. Both parents and providers acknowledge that the child's chronic critical illness could be a source of support. CONCLUSIONS: PICU providers perceived social and medical isolation in parents of children with chronic critical illness; however, parents did not endorse either directly. A majority of parents showed signs of depression despite reporting good social support. Providers reported feeling medically isolated from children with chronic critical illness and their families related to burnout and insufficient training. Novel methods to address these issues are needed.