Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Neurooncol Pract ; 8(1): 31-39, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33664967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to determine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for cerebral vasculopathy after cranial proton and photon radiation for pediatric brain tumors. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of a cohort of children treated with proton radiation for brain tumors. MRA and/or MRI were reviewed for evidence of cerebral vascular stenosis and infarcts. Twenty-one similar studies (17 photon, 4 proton) were identified by systematic literature review. RESULTS: For 81 patients with median follow-up of 3 years, the rates of overall and severe vasculopathy were 9.9% and 6.2% respectively, occurring a median of 2 years post radiation. Dose to optic chiasm greater than 45 Gy and suprasellar location were significant risk factors. Results were consistent with 4 prior proton studies (752 patients) that reported incidence of 5% to 6.7%, 1.5 to 3 years post radiation. With significantly longer follow-up (3.7-19 years), 9 studies (1108 patients) with traditional photon radiation reported a higher rate (6.3%-20%) and longer time to vasculopathy (2-28 years). Significant risk factors were neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1; rate 7.6%-60%) and suprasellar tumors (9%-20%). In 10 studies with photon radiation (1708 patients), the stroke rate was 2% to 18.8% (2.3-24 years post radiation). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood brain tumor survivors need screening for vasculopathy after cranial radiation, especially with higher dose to optic chiasm, NF-1, and suprasellar tumors. Prospective studies are needed to identify risk groups, and ideal modality and timing, for screening of this toxicity.

2.
Radiother Oncol ; 132: 155-161, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414759

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To facilitate the initiation of observational studies on late effects of proton therapy in pediatric patients, we report on current patterns of proton therapy use worldwide in patients aged less than 22 years. MATERIALS & METHODS: Fifty-four proton centers treating pediatric patients in 2016 in 11 countries were invited to respond to a survey about the number of patients treated during that year by age group, intent of treatment, delivery technique and tumor types. RESULTS: Among the 40 participating centers (participation rate: 74%), a total of 1,860 patients were treated in 2016 (North America: 1205, Europe: 432, Asia: 223). The numbers of patients per center ranged from 1 to 206 (median: 29). Twenty-four percent of the patients were <5 years of age, and 50% <10 years. More than 30 pediatric tumor types were identified, mainly treated with curative intent: 48% were CNS, 25% extra-cranial sarcomas, 7% neuroblastoma, and 5% hematopoietic tumors. About half of the patients were treated with pencil beam scanning. Treatment patterns were broadly similar across the three continents. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this survey provides the first worldwide assessment of proton therapy use for pediatric cancer management. Since previous estimates in the United States and Europe, CNS tumors remain the cancer types most commonly treated with protons in 2016. However, the proportion of extra-cranial tumors is growing worldwide. The typically low numbers of patients treated in each center indicate the need for international research collaborations to assess long-term outcomes of proton therapy in pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
3.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 59(2): 221-8, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25146003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare dosimetrically and radiobiologically 3D conformal, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), RapidArc (RA) volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton therapy techniques for early-stage glottic cancer. METHODS: Ten patients were retrospectively selected. Photon treatment planning was performed using Eclipse External Beam Planning, and proton planning was performed using CMS Xio. The minimum, mean and maximum dose values for planning target volume (PTV), mean and maximum dose values for organ at risk, % of volume of PTV receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose, and D20, D50 and D90 of carotid arteries were compared. Biological response models of tumour control probabilities and normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: IMRT, RA and proton plans versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans consistently provided superior PTV coverage and decreased mean dose to the thyroid and carotid arteries. CONCLUSION: All these three modalities showed superiority with less variation among themselves compared with 3D-CRT plans. Clinical investigation is warranted to determine if these treatment approaches will translate into a reduction in radiation therapy-induced toxicities.


Asunto(s)
Glotis/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Especificidad de Órganos , Radiometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Cancer J ; 15(1): 87-92, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19197182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate overall and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with nonmycosis fungoides (non-MF) primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with PCL excluding cases of MF treated between 1993 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Survival statistics were estimated by the methods of Kaplan and Meier, and univariate and multivariate significance testing were performed by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34.6 months (range, 2-138.3 months). The overall survival for the entire study population, at 5 and 10 years, was 97% and 78%, respectively. The RFS for the entire study population, at 5 and 10 years, was 30% and 22%, respectively. For those who received radiotherapy (RT) as a component of their initial therapy, the RFS at 5 and 10 years was 48% and 36%, respectively. Among those receiving RT who relapsed, the site of relapse was out-of-field in 82% of the cases. In our multivariate analysis, only RT as a component of the initial therapy and the absence of bulky disease had a statistically significant improvement in RFS (P = 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: RT improves the local control and RFS of patients with non-MF PCL.


Asunto(s)
Linfoma no Hodgkin/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Linfoma no Hodgkin/patología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Terapia PUVA , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA