Measuring the Interprofessional Health of the Pediatric Cardiovascular Operating Room Work Environment.

Introduction: Pediatric cardiac surgery is complex and has significant risk, requiring interprofessional teamwork for optimal outcomes. Unhealthy work environments have been linked to poor patient outcomes, staff dissatisfaction, and intention to leave. We describe the interprofessional health of pediatric cardiovascular operating room (CVOR) work environments in the United States and the establishment of a healthy work environment (HWE) benchmark score. Methods: Utilizing the American Association of Critical Care Nurses Healthy Work Environments Assessment Tool (HWEAT), interprofessional staff from 11 pediatric CVORs were surveyed. Responses were aggregated, summarized, and stratified by role to examine differences. The following phase used an e-Delphi approach to obtain expert consensus on a benchmark target. Results: Across 11 centers, 179 (60%) completed surveys were reviewed. The interprofessional mean HWEAT score was 3.55 (2.65-4.34). Mean scores for each standard were within the "good" range. Participants reported the highest scores for effective decision-making, with a mean of 3.69 (3.00-4.20). Meaningful recognition scored lowest, mean 3.26 (2.33-4.07). When stratified, surgeons reported higher overall HWE scores (M = 3.79, SD = 0.13) than nurses (M = 3.41, SD = 0.19; P = 0.02, two-tailed). The proposed benchmark was 3.50. Conclusions: This is the first time the American Association of Critical Care Nurses HWEAT has been used to describe the interprofessional health of work environments in pediatric CVORs in the United States. The targeted benchmark can support pediatric CVOR improvement strategies. Creating and sustaining an HWE is an interprofessional opportunity to support high-quality patient outcomes and clinical excellence.

The Voice of Travel Nurses: Facilitating Effective Staffing During Pandemic and Expansion-Related Demands in a Children's Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the experience and perceived value of travel nurses in a children's hospital. BACKGROUND: Children's hospitals face unique challenges related to highly specialized care requirements and workforce expansion limitations. Travel nurses can augment nurse staffing capacity during times of intense demand and may offer insights as organizations seek to strengthen work environments. METHODS: Pediatric travel nurses currently contracted at the hospital were invited to participate in a focus group or interview. Content analysis was used to summarize information and identify themes. RESULTS: From the 56 participants, 5 themes emerged. The themes were financial, flexibility, searching for healthy work environments, nursing care, and solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing the voices of travel nurses may offer valuable feedback to strengthen future professional practice environments.

Perceptions of Interprofessional Practitioners Regarding Pediatric Palliative Transports.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric palliative transport (PPT) is the practice of offering critically and terminally ill children requiring life-sustaining measures the opportunity to be discharged from the hospital to home or a hospice facility for end-of-life care. Although studies have shown PPT to favorably affect both children and their families, limited research exists on the perspectives of health care practitioners. OBJECTIVES: To understand the experience of interprofessional practitioners who have cared for a critically or terminally ill child during a PPT and their perception of PPT as a care option. METHODS: This study is a qualitative descriptive inquiry conducted using 8 focus groups. Participants included interprofessional staff from 4 specialty intensive care units, the pediatric advanced care team, and the critical care transport team at a quaternary, freestanding children's hospital. Content analysis was used to summarize themes and recommendations. RESULTS: Five overarching themes were identified: PPT as a care pathway, education, communication, support, and closure. Use of PPT was perceived as aligned with the hospital's mission of family-centered care and as providing a way for the health care team to support a family's choice. Participants recommended further development of information to guide communication and processes of care that would enhance the experience for families and staff and support PPT as a care pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric palliative transport is considered a feasible, valuable, and critical end-of-life intervention. The value that PPT has brought to participating families warrants continued investment in the intervention's standardization and enhancement.