Evidence for direct interaction between the oncogenic proteins E6 and E7 of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV).

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are DNA tumor viruses that infect mucosal and cutaneous epithelial cells of more than 20 vertebrates. High-risk HPV causes about 5% of human cancers worldwide, and the viral proteins E6 and E7 promote carcinogenesis by interacting with tumor suppressors and interfering with many cellular pathways. As a consequence, they immortalize cells more efficiently in concert than individually. So far, the networks of E6 and E7 with their respective cellular targets have been studied extensively but independently. However, we hypothesized that E6 and E7 might also interact directly with each other in a novel interaction affecting HPV-related carcinogenesis. Here, we report a direct interaction between E6 and E7 proteins from carcinogenic HPV types 16 and 31. We demonstrated this interaction via cellular assays using two orthogonal methods: coimmunoprecipitation and flow cytometry-based FRET assays. Analytical ultracentrifugation of the recombinant proteins revealed that the stoichiometry of the E6/E7 complex involves two E7 molecules and two E6 molecules. In addition, fluorescence polarization showed that (I) E6 binds to E7 with a similar affinity for HPV16 and HPV31 (in the same micromolar range) and (II) that the binding interface involves the unstructured N-terminal region of E7. The direct interaction of these highly conserved papillomaviral oncoproteins may provide a new perspective for studying HPV-associated carcinogenesis and the overall viral life cycle.

Structure of High-Risk Papillomavirus 31 E6 Oncogenic Protein and Characterization of E6/E6AP/p53 Complex Formation.

The degradation of p53 is a hallmark of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) of the alpha genus and HPV-related carcinogenicity. The oncoprotein E6 forms a ternary complex with the E3 ubiquitin ligase E6-associated protein (E6AP) and tumor suppressor protein p53 targeting p53 for ubiquitination. The extent of p53 degradation by different E6 proteins varies greatly, even for the closely related HPV16 and HPV31. HPV16 E6 and HPV31 E6 display high sequence identity (∼67%). We report here, for the first time, the structure of HPV31 E6 bound to the LxxLL motif of E6AP. HPV16 E6 and HPV31 E6 are structurally very similar, in agreement with the high sequence conservation. Both E6 proteins bind E6AP and degrade p53. However, the binding affinities of 31 E6 to the LxxLL motif of E6AP and p53, respectively, are reduced 2-fold and 5.4-fold compared to 16 E6. The affinity of E6-E6AP-p53 ternary complex formation parallels the efficacy of the subsequent reaction, namely, degradation of p53. Therefore, closely related E6 proteins addressing the same cellular targets may still diverge in their binding efficiencies, possibly explaining their different phenotypic or pathological impacts.IMPORTANCE Variations of carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses are related to variations of the E6 and E7 interactome. While different HPV species and genera are known to target distinct host proteins, the fine differences between E6 and E7 of closely related HPVs, supposed to target the same cellular protein pools, remain to be addressed. We compare the oncogenic E6 proteins of the closely related high-risk HPV31 and HPV16 with regard to their structure and their efficiency of ternary complex formation with their cellular targets p53 and E6AP, which results in p53 degradation. We solved the crystal structure of 31 E6 bound to the E6AP LxxLL motif. HPV16 E6 and 31 E6 structures are highly similar, but a few sequence variations lead to different protein contacts within the ternary complex and, as quantified here, an overall lower binding affinity of 31 E6 than 16 E6. These results align with the observed lower p53 degradation potential of 31 E6.

Refolding and in vitro characterization of human papillomavirus 16 minor capsid protein L2.

The minor capsid protein L2 of papillomaviruses exhibits multiple functions during viral entry including membrane interaction. Information on the protein is scarce, because of its high tendency of aggregation. We determined suitable conditions to produce a functional human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 L2 protein and thereby provide the opportunity for extensive in vitro analysis with respect to structural and biochemical information on L2 proteins and mechanistic details in viral entry. We produced the L2 protein of high-risk HPV 16 in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies and purified the protein under denaturing conditions. A successive buffer screen resulted in suitable conditions for the biophysical characterization of 16L2. Analytical ultracentrifugation of the refolded protein showed a homogenous monomeric species. Furthermore, refolded 16L2 shows secondary structure elements. The N-terminal region including the proposed transmembrane region of 16L2 shows alpha-helical characteristics. However, overall 16L2 appears largely unstructured. Refolded 16L2 is capable of binding to DNA indicating that the putative DNA-binding regions are accessible in refolded 16L2. Further the refolded protein interacts with liposomal membranes presumably via the proposed transmembrane region at neutral pH without structural changes. This indicates that 16L2 can initially interact with membranes via pre-existing structural features.