Risk factors for incident delirium among urological patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE summary of findings.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative delirium is an important, yet under-researched complication of surgery. Patients undergoing urological surgery may be at especially high risk of POD, as they are often older, and interventions can be associated with conditions that trigger delirium. The main aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence for risk factors in this patient group. METHODS: Five databases were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychInfo) between January 1987 and June 2019. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess for risk of bias. Pooled odds ratio or mean difference (MD) for individual risk factors were estimated using the Mantel-Haenzel and inverse variance methods. RESULTS: Seven articles met the inclusion criteria, giving a total population of 1937. The incidence of POD ranged from 5 to 29%. Three studies were deemed low risk of bias and four at a high risk of bias. Nine risk factors were suitable for meta-analysis, with age (MD 4.314 95% CI 1.597, 7.032 p = 0.002) and the clock drawing test (MD - 2.443 95% CI - 3.029, - 1.857 p < 0.001) having a statistically significant association with POD in pooled analyses. CONCLUSION: Delirium is common in urological patients. This review has identified a lack of studies in this surgical population, with wide heterogeneity and high risk of bias. It also highlights a number of potential risk factors for post-operative delirium, of which some are modifiable. However, the strength of evidence is weak at present and so future research should focus on assessing comparable risk factors in this patient group in order to inform future clinical practice. Review registration The review protocol was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (reference CRD42017054613).

Single centre versus multi-centre pooled morbidity data in PCNL and the implications for informed consent.

Background: National and international outcome data following PCNL have been available for many years, but multi-centre data may not reflect the outcome from an individual surgeon or hospital.Methods: A combination of retrospective and prospective single centre data was collated from 2000-2016 and are compared to large single and multi-centre series.Results: Data were available on 801 unique cases performed between 2000 and 2016, mean age = 55.2 (SD = 14.8) (range = 17-93). The mean change in haemoglobin after PCNL was 1.65 g/dL ± 0.05, n = 630. Twenty-seven patients required a blood transfusion (3.37%). In 470 cases, data on pre-operative urine culture was available. One hundred and nineteen (25%) demonstrated evidence of bacteriuria pre-operatively. The most common isolated species were E. Coli and Proteus Mirabilis. Pre-operative urine infection was associated with a greater drop in haemoglobin following surgery, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Changes in serum creatinine and eGFR rise following surgery were calculated. The mean rise was found to be 15.21 µmol/L (SE = 2.08, n = 208). The mean drop in eGFR was estimated to be 7.35 ml/min/1.73 m2 (± 0.895, n = 205). Eight cases of 801 (1%) required admission to higher level care. There was one small bowel puncture and one pleural perforation recorded. Sub-selective embolization due to bleeding occurred in six cases (0 .75%) and there were no peri-operative deaths in this series. Published data comparing single centres with > 500 cases are presented.Conclusion: To facilitate transparent consent, single-centre rather than pooled outcome data should be utilized.

The diagnostic yield of computed tomography in the management of acute flank pain and the emergency intervention rate for a proven acute ureteric stone.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic and management pathways for patients presenting with acute flank pain are complex. Although computed tomography (CT) of the kidneys, ureters and bladder (KUB) is the gold standard investigation for urolithiasis, the multitude of differential diagnoses must also be considered in the context of long-term risk from ionising radiation. This study investigated the integrated role and diagnostic yield of non-contrast CT in cases of acute flank pain. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of 1,442 consecutive patients investigated with CT KUB between March 2013 and February 2015. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield of CT with secondary outcomes being predictors of need for urological intervention. RESULTS: A cause for acute flank pain was identified in 717 patients (50%), there was an incidental finding in 389 patients (27%) and normal imaging was reported in 336 patients (23%). A diagnosis was more commonly made in male than in female patients (70% vs 40%) and with increasing age (46% in patients aged <30 years, 56% in those aged 30-49 years and 63% in those aged ≥50 years). The overall rate for an ipsilateral urinary tract stone was 41%. Factors strongly associated with emergency intervention included stone size >10mm (odds ratio [OR]: 11.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3-42.7), stones located at the pelviureteric junction (OR: 7.8, 95% CI: 2.6-22.9), C-reactive protein >50mg/l and ≤100mg/l (OR: 15.2, 95% CI: 5.1-45.3), and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30ml/min (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.5-21.8). CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary study identifies age and sex as independent variables affecting the diagnostic yield of CT KUB in cases of acute flank pain, and highlights factors associated with a need for emergency intervention in proven ureteric stones.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is being increasingly offered to the older person. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature regarding laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in older people and compare to younger adult populations. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials that compared open to laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Older people were defined as being 65 years and above. OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay, wound recurrence, disease-free survival and conversion rate. RESULTS: Seven trials included older people, average age of approximately 70 years. Two reported data specific to older patients (over 70 years): The ALCCaS study reported reduced length of stay and short-term complication rates in the laparoscopic group when compared to open surgery (8 versus 10 days, and 36.7% versus 50.6% respectively) and the CLASICC study reported equivalent 5 year survival between arms and a reduction of 2 days length of stay following laparoscopic surgery in older people. In trials which considered data on older and younger participants all five trials reported comparable overall survival and showed comparable or reduced complication rates; two demonstrated significantly shorter length of stay following laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. CONCLUSION: Large numbers of older people have been included in well-conducted, multi-centre, randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery. This systematic review suggests that age itself should not be a factor when considering the best surgical option for older patients.