Radiation oncology in a Canadian province: measures of workload and treatment complexity.

AIMS: A growing and aging population is associated with an increased incidence of cancer. Advances in radiotherapy technology have changed the way radiation is planned and delivered. This population-based study documented changes in workload and treatment complexity over a 10 year period in a Canadian province. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the population-based radiation records of a provincial Canadian cancer centre from 2000 (or from 2005 for some measures) to 2009 inclusive. We propose new measures of workload and treatment complexity currently used in our centre that can be easily adopted by other cancer centres. RESULTS: Workload measured by total new-to-doctor consultations increased 30% from 2000 to 2009 (3.3% annually, P=0.0008). Total treatment commencements increased 35% over the same time (3.9% annually, P<0.0001) but linear accelerator (linac) commencements increased at a slower rate of 2.0% annually (P=0.0002). The rates of increase in consultations and total commencements were faster than the rates of increase in the total population, the population over age 50 years, or the incidence of cancer. Implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery and increased brachytherapy treatments explain much of the increased workload. Measures of treatment complexity including simulations per linac course and radiation computer plans per linac course increased at steady rates of 3.6% (P=0.0019) and 3.2% (P=0.0088) annually, respectively, but portals (fields) per linac treatment course increased exponentially after the implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The number of fractions per linac patient declined by 2.6% annually (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study showed that radiation oncology workload increased at faster rates than the population or incidence of cancer. Measures of treatment complexity indicate an increasing investment for each course of linac treatment, but also the adoption of hypofractionated regimens. These results indicate that radiotherapy manpower requirements cannot be based on population or cancer incidence alone if current technological trends continue.

Radiation treatment waiting times for breast cancer patients in Manitoba, 2001 and 2005.

INTRODUCTION: Our study examined the wait time from ready-to-treat to radiation therapy for cohorts of breast cancer patients requiring adjuvant radiation therapy in 2001 and in 2005 after the implementation of strategies to reduce wait times for radiation treatment. We also examined the overall time from diagnosis to radiation treatment and whether distance from the cancer treatment centre or month of referral had an effect on wait times. METHODS: This population-based retrospective study looked at representative samples of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2001 and 2005. Patients who required radiation treatment to the breast or chest wall were followed from first contact to the start of radiation treatment. RESULTS: Time from ready-to-treat to first radiation treatment was significantly reduced for patients in 2005 as compared with 2001, regardless of whether chemotherapy was administered before radiation treatment. Time from diagnosis to radiation treatment was not different by year for those who received radiation only. Time from diagnosis to chemotherapy was significantly longer in 2005. No effect of month of diagnosis on wait times was observed. INTERPRETATION: A significant improvement in the median wait time from ready-to-treat to first radiation treatment was noted from 2001 to 2005. This improvement may be attributable to measures taken to reduce such waits. However, we observed an increase in the median time from diagnosis to referral and from referral to consultation with medical or radiation oncology (or both), so that the overall time from diagnosis to radiation treatment was not different. Although specific intervals related to radiation treatment delivery were improved, the entire trajectory of breast cancer care experienced by patients needs to be considered.

Long-term follow-up of axillary node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen alone: patterns of recurrence.

PURPOSE: To determine the patterns, incidence and risk factors for local-regional recurrence in patients with Stage II and III breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen alone, without adjuvant radiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The records of patients referred to the London Regional Cancer Centre with a diagnosis of breast cancer between 1980-1989 were reviewed. During this time period, it was the policy of the institution to omit local-regional radiation to patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. One hundred and fifty axillary node-positive Stage II and III breast cancer patients received adjuvant tamoxifen alone without postoperative local-regional radiation; these patients form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 67 months for the entire patient group and 85 months for the living patients. During this time, 42% of patients developed a recurrence, 22% first recurred in local-regional sites. The total incidence of local-regional recurrence (including those patients who first relapsed with systemic metastases) was 30%. Of the segmental mastectomy patients, 13% had recurrences in the intact breast. Of the modified radical mastectomy patients, 10% developed chest wall recurrences. Five percent of recurrences were first in the axilla and 6% in the supraclavicular nodes. Five-year actuarial survival for the entire patient group was 79% and disease-free survival was 60%, with a median disease-free survival time of 87 months. Five-year local-regional relapse-free survival was 76%. Five-year local-regional relapse-free survival was < 76% for those patients with 4 or more positive axillary nodes, regardless of tumor size. On univariable analysis, positive resection margins, number of positive axillary nodes, menopausal status, and negative estrogen and progesterone receptors were significant for isolated local-regional recurrence. On multivariable analysis, only positive resection margins and negative receptors remained significant. In terms of regional recurrence specifically, negative estrogen and progesterone-receptor status and positive resection margins were, again, prognostically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen who have positive resection margins, > or = 4 positive axillary nodes and/or negative estrogen and progesterone receptors, are at higher risk of local and regional recurrence and should, therefore, receive local-regional radiation.

Long-term follow-up of axillary node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy alone: patterns of recurrence.

PURPOSE: Prognostic factors for locoregional failure have been poorly documented. The purpose of this retrospective review is to examine the patterns of failure of 320 patients with Stage II or III axillary node-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy without locoregional radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 735 patients who were referred to the London Regional Cancer Centre between 1980 and 1989 with a diagnosis of Stage II or III breast cancer were reviewed. Three hundred and twenty patients were identified who underwent segmental mastectomy with axillary dissection or modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy without adjuvant locoregional radiation. Seventy-one percent of these patients had undergone a modified radical mastectomy, 40% had T1 tumors, 49% T2, and 11% T3. Resection margins were positive in 13 patients. The median number of axillary nodes removed was 11. Fifty-four percent had one to three positive axillary nodes, 27% had four to seven positive nodes, and 19% had in excess of seven positive nodes. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the 320 patients was 77 months. One hundred and fourteen patients developed a locoregional recurrence as the site of first relapse (31 in the intact breast, 29 on the chest wall, 21 in the axilla, 22 in the supraclavicular fossa, 1 in the internal mammary chain, and 10 in multiple sites). Thirty-three percent of segmental mastectomy patients and 13% of modified radical mastectomy patients developed local recurrence. Seven percent of patients recurred in axillary or supraclavicular nodes each. Factors with regard to locoregional recurrence which on univariate analysis were significant included type of mastectomy (i.e., segmental vs. modified radical), size of primary tumor, positive resection margins, and percentage of ideal chemotherapy dose intensity (< 66% vs. > or = 66%). After multivariate analysis, only type of mastectomy, size of primary tumor, and percentage of ideal chemotherapy dose intensity retained significance. The number of positive axillary nodes was not a significant factor. Number of positive axillary nodes plus the above four clinical factors were analyzed in terms of regional recurrence specifically. By univariate and multivariate analysis, only size of primary tumor retained significance. Again, the number of positive axillary nodes was not a relevant factor. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who are at high risk of locoregional recurrence include those who undergo segmental mastectomy and those with larger tumors (> 5 cm in diameter). Breast or chest wall radiation is recommended for these groups. Supraclavicular radiation is recommended for patients with tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter. Axillary recurrences were relatively infrequent in patients who had undergone an adequate Level I and II axillary dissection, and therefore, axillary radiation was not recommended.

Extracapsular axillary node extension in patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy: an indication for radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective review into the patterns of failure of 82 patients with Stage II or III breast cancer who had extracapsular extension (ECE) of axillary nodal metastases and who received systemic chemotherapy or hormonal therapy without loco-regional radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical records of patients with axillary node positive (T1-T3, N1, 2) Stage II or III breast cancer seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre between 1980-1989 were reviewed. Patients were identified who underwent segmental mastectomy with axillary node dissection or modified radical mastectomy and received adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen but did not undergo loco-regional radiation. Eighty-two patients within this group had pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension (ECE). For 45 of these patients the extension was extensive, and for the remaining 37 it was microscopic. This ECE-positive group was compared to a subgroup of 172 patients who did not have pathologic evidence of extracapsular axillary node extension but had metastatic carcinoma confined within the nodal capsule. RESULTS: Median age of the 82 ECE-positive patients was 56 years. Twenty-five patients had had a segmental mastectomy, the remainder a modified radical mastectomy. Median actuarial survival was 60 months, with a median disease-free and loco-regional failure-free survival of 38 months. Seventy-eight percent of these patients developed a recurrence, which was loco-regional in 60% (21% local, 21% regional, 2% local and regional, and 16% loco-regional and metastatic). There was a 36% recurrence rate in intact breast, 14% the chest wall following modified radical mastectomy, 7% relapsed in the axilla, 12% in supraclavicular nodes, and 1% in the internal mammary nodes. A comparison of the 82 ECE-positive patients with a group of 172 ECE-negative patients determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival (overall and disease-free) and loco-regional recurrence. Univariate analysis of the entire 254 node-positive patient group revealed extracapsular nodal extension (ECE) to be a prognostically significant factor for actuarial and disease-free survival as well as for loco-regional failure, but ECE did not remain an independently prognostic factor after multivariate analysis. Segmental mastectomy, positive resection margins, and ER negative status increased the risk of loco-regional recurrence within the ECE-positive group. CONCLUSIONS: Extracapsular axillary node extension is a prognostically significant factor for actuarial survival, disease-free survival, and loco-regional failure but not independent of other adverse prognostic factors. It is a marker for increased loco-regional recurrence associated with doubling of breast, chest wall, and supraclavicular recurrence rates. The risk of axillary relapse in patients who have had an adequate level I and II axillary dissection but demonstrate extracapsular extension is low (7%). We recommend breast/chest wall and supraclavicular radiation for all patients with pathologic evidence of such extranodal extension who have had a level I and II axillary dissection regardless of the number of positive axillary nodes. Axillary irradiation should be considered for patients who have had only an axillary sampling or level I axillary dissection.

Tamoxifen with and without radiation after partial mastectomy in patients with involved nodes.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of tamoxifen on local control after partial mastectomy with and without adjuvant breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 97 node positive patients identified from the records of the London Regional Cancer Center included 44 patients who received tamoxifen and breast irradiation (40 or 50 Gy plus booster dose) after partial mastectomy, and 53 patients who received tamoxifen only after partial mastectomy. Base line characteristics of the two groups were similar. RESULTS: At 39 months actuarial follow-up there was a breast tumor recurrence (BTR) in 5% vs. 21% of patients when radiation was omitted (p = 0.0388), but there was no difference in the cause-specific mortality of the two treatment groups. Cox Regression analysis (on only 10 BTR) showed age and adjuvant radiation as significant predictors of BTR. In patients not receiving radiation, no BTR was seen in 22 patients > or = 70 years of age at diagnosis vs. 8 BTR in 31 patients < 70 years (p = 0.0130). All BTR occurred while patients were receiving tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen alone with omission of radiation after partial mastectomy provides inferior breast tumor control in node positive patients. This is especially true for patients under 70 years of age. Patients aged 70 years or older at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer who receive tamoxifen have a low rate of breast tumor recurrence when radiation is omitted. These patients represent a group for whom radiation might not be necessary.