Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 149(1): 29-34, 2017 Dec 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29272886

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Inconclusive RBC antibody identification (ABID) may delay RBC crossmatch. An increased number of inconclusive ABID was observed, and an algorithm was developed to improve ABID efficiency. METHODS: RBC antibody screen (AS) and ABID were initially performed using solid-phase RBC adherence assay (SPRCA) and manual tube method. A retrospective analysis of AS and ABID results was performed pre- and postalgorithm implementation. RESULTS: The number of inconclusive ABID results decreased from 26 to six per month pre- and postimplementation, respectively. SPRCA became the primary AS method, and manual tube became the gold standard for ABID. SPRCA was used for ABID upon reference specialist secondary review and allowed identification of 30 specific RBC antibodies, for which no patients developed signs or symptoms of a hemolytic transfusion reaction. CONCLUSIONS: RBC reference workflow using SPRCA and manual tube methods for AS and ABID decreases "inconclusive" ABID without adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Anticuerpos/sangre , Tipificación y Pruebas Cruzadas Sanguíneas/métodos , Eritrocitos/inmunología , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reacción a la Transfusión , Flujo de Trabajo
3.
Transfusion ; 55(6): 1331-9, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25823522

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelets and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial was a randomized clinical trial comparing survival after transfusion of two different blood component ratios for emergency resuscitation of traumatic massive hemorrhage. Transfusion services supporting the study were expected to provide thawed plasma, platelets, and red blood cells within 10 minutes of request. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: At the 12 Level 1 trauma centers participating in PROPPR, blood components transfused and delivery times were tabulated, with a focus on universal donor (UD) plasma management. The adequacy of site plans was assessed by comparing the bedside blood availability times to study goals and the new American College of Surgeons guidelines. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 sites were able to consistently deliver 6 units of thawed UD plasma to their trauma-receiving unit within 10 minutes and 12 units in 20 minutes. Three sites used blood group A plasma instead of AB for massive transfusion without complications. Approximately 4700 units of plasma were given to the 680 patients enrolled in the trial. No site experienced shortages of AB plasma that limited enrollment. Two of 12 sites reported wastage of thawed AB plasma approaching 25% of AB plasma prepared. CONCLUSION: Delivering UD plasma to massively hemorrhaging patients was accomplished consistently and rapidly and without excessive wastage in high-volume trauma centers. The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program guidelines for massive transfusion protocol UD plasma availability are practicable in large academic trauma centers. Use of group A plasma in trauma resuscitation needs further study.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Hemorragia/terapia , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Plasma , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/sangre , Bancos de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conservación de la Sangre , Criopreservación , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Resucitación , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Almacenamiento de Sangre/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA