Creating a postgraduate syllabus for a team care diploma examination: a Delphi study.

Objectives: There is no agreed standard assessment of the minimum knowledge and skills that are required to provide healthcare to participants in individual or team sports. This study aims to develop a syllabus for the Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine (FSEM) Team Care Diploma examination. This will provide a recognised assessment of the minimum required skills and knowledge for healthcare professionals providing care in an individual and team sport environment. Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used. A syllabus was developed by a purposeful selection of members of the FSEM, all of whom have significant team care experience. This was then reviewed by the Delphi expert panel who were team care practitioners with at least 5 years of experience. A two-round Delphi approach was used to develop a consensus. Results: The expert panel consisted of 50 individuals, with 46 (92%) completing both rounds. Of the 447 learning objectives (LOs) proposed; 430 (96%) were accepted outright, 17 (4%) were rejected and four new LOs were introduced based on expert panel feedback. The final syllabus contained 434 LOs across 6 modules (clinical governance, safe and effective practice, interdisciplinary teamwork, specific athlete groups, specific health conditions and duties of the medical team). Conclusion: This standardised syllabus will be used as the basis for the new FSEM Team Care Diploma examination which will aim to provide world-leading standardised assessment of the minimum skills and knowledge required for healthcare professionals across the multidisciplinary team providing care in individual and team sport.

Return to sport decisions after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury: introducing the PAASS framework-an international multidisciplinary consensus.

BACKGROUND: Despite being the most commonly incurred sports injury with a high recurrence rate, there are no guidelines to inform return to sport (RTS) decisions following acute lateral ankle sprain injuries. We aimed to develop a list of assessment items to address this gap. METHODS: We used a three-round Delphi survey approach to develop consensus of opinion among 155 globally diverse health professionals working in elite field or court sports. This involved surveys that were structured in question format with both closed-response and open-response options. We asked panellists to indicate their agreement about whether or not assessment items should support the RTS decision after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. The second and third round surveys included quantitative and qualitative feedback from the previous round. We defined a priori consensus being reached at >70% agree or disagree responses. RESULTS: Sixteen assessment items reached consensus to be included in the RTS decision after an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. They were mapped to five domains with 98% panellist agreement-PAASS: Pain (during sport participation and over the last 24 hours), Ankle impairments (range of motion; muscle strength, endurance and power), Athlete perception (perceived ankle confidence/reassurance and stability; psychological readiness), Sensorimotor control (proprioception; dynamic postural control/balance), Sport/functional performance (hopping, jumping and agility; sport-specific drills; ability to complete a full training session). CONCLUSION: Expert opinion indicated that pain severity, ankle impairments, sensorimotor control, athlete perception/readiness and sport/functional performance should be assessed to inform the RTS decision following an acute lateral ankle sprain injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000522112.

Practicability of lower extremity functional performance tests and their measurement properties in elite athletes: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Lower extremity injury (LEI) is highly prevalent and its occurrence increases the risk of future injury in athletic populations. Identifying athletes at risk of injury is the key to target injury-prevention programmes. Functional performance tests (FPT) assess an athlete's ability to produce and accept forces during movement tasks reflective of those experienced in sport, and are used to identify deficits in physical qualities or neuromuscular control. This review aims to identify FPT which have potential to predict LEI and assess their measurement properties associated with reliability, validity, responsiveness and practicability (interpretability and feasibility). METHODS/ANALYSIS: This protocol will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Methodology. The search strategy has two stages: stage 1 will identify lower limb FPT used in athletic populations; and stage 2 will assess the measurement properties of the identified FPT. A sensitive search strategy will use MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and SPORTdiscus databases; from inception to June 2020. Hand searching reference lists, key journals and grey literature will be completed. One reviewer will complete search 1 and data extraction. Two reviewers will complete the search, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment for search 2. Evidence will be pooled or summarised by individual measurement property by each individual study and grouped by FPT. Meta-analysis using a random effects model with subgroup analysis will be performed where possible. Pooled or summarised results for each FPT in relation to each measurement property will be rated against the criteria for good measurement properties. Two reviewers will assess the overall body of evidence per measurement property per FPT using the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. This review will enable clinicians to make an informed choice when selecting FPT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this review and the results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and submitted for conference presentation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020188932.