Two-week target for laparoscopic cholecystectomy following gallstone pancreatitis is achievable and cost neutral.

BACKGROUND: The British Society of Gastroenterology recommends that all patients with gallstone pancreatitis should undergo cholecystectomy within 2 weeks. This study assessed whether these guidelines are feasible and cost-effective. METHODS: Admissions for gallstone pancreatitis between January 2006 and January 2008 were reviewed. Readmissions for subsequent pancreatitis or biliary pathology were noted together with additional investigations, severity scores, hospital stay and time to cholecystectomy. The costs of readmission and theoretical costs of developing a dedicated operating list were provided by independent accountants. RESULTS: During the 2 years, 153 patients were admitted. Twenty-one patients (13.7 per cent) had further attacks requiring 40 readmissions. There were no deaths. Additional hospital costs related to readmissions were 172,170 pound sterling, including bed occupancy (67,860 pound sterling), investigations (12,510 pound sterling) and 153 cholecystectomies on an existing theatre list (91,800 pound sterling). The estimated cost of staffing a half-day theatre list every fortnight, performing 153 cholecystectomies, was 170,391 pound sterling. CONCLUSION: Instigating a dedicated theatre for cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis has many potential benefits. The costs of readmissions and ad hoc operating are balanced by those of a dedicated theatre list in the long term. Implementation of the guidelines would save approximately 900 pound sterling annually and be cost neutral.

Radiological review of specimen radiographs after breast localisation biopsy is not always necessary.

INTRODUCTION: The use of specimen radiographs to confirm the presence of the radiological abnormality in a breast specimen after localisation biopsy is standard practice. This study aims to show that a trained surgeon may assess breast specimen radiographs with similar efficacy as a radiologist. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed all patients who had localisation breast surgery using wire or ultrasound (US) techniques between January 2002 and March 2003. Histopathological records and mammographic details were recorded from the hospital notes. A consultant radiologist and surgeon reviewed the specimen radiographs, identifying mammographic abnormalities and assessing margins. RESULTS: Localisation surgery was performed on 101 patients with US used to localize 68. The median specimen weight was 64g. A malignant diagnosis was made in 86 patients. In 23, the histological resection margins were considered to be close or involved by tumour and re-excision was performed in eight patients. Sixty-one specimen radiographs were reviewed. The radiologist identified every mammographic abnormality, and the surgeon identified the lesion in 58. The positive predictive value of specimen radiographs to identify histologically involved margins was 75 and 74% by the radiologist and the surgeon, respectively. Where good radiograph margins were reported in 40 and 35 patients by the radiologist and surgeon, respectively, 11 and 7 had histologically involved margins. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a suitably trained or experienced surgeon can assess specimen radiographs effectively without the need for intraoperative radiological input although complete histological resection is not guaranteed despite specimen radiographs demonstrating clear margins.

Improving the sensitivity of stereotactic core biopsy to diagnose ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a mathematical model.

Stereotactic core biopsy (SCB) is performed on mammographically suspicious, non-palpable lesions of the breast. Reported sensitivities of SCB for the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) vary from 41% to 93%. We have developed a simple mathematical model to predict the probability of retrieving at least one diagnostic core from a focus of DCIS. We make recommendations of the number of samples needed for different sized areas of microcalcification. The sensitivity of SCB is affected by needle placement accuracy, diameter of the area of microcalcification (d), histological density of DCIS (x) (calculated as 7.5% by previous studies) and number of core samples (n) removed. The probability of achieving at least one representative core sufficient for diagnosis (P(core)) is defined as: P(core) = 1-(1 + p ([1- (x/100)]d - 1 ))n, where rho is the probability of a SCB accurately targeting the area of microcalcification. At least seven core samples should be removed in small foci (<5 mm) of DCIS to achieve a 0.75 probability of an accurate diagnosis. The probability of a diagnostic biopsy of larger areas of DCIS (>10 mm) is 0.95 when five cores are removed. This formula serves as an explanation to patients why SCB may fail to diagnose DCIS, and justifies the retrieval of more core samples to increase the probability of an accurate diagnosis and to reduce the chance of a non-representative core. In the absence of sufficient samples, a wire-guided open biopsy is necessary to exclude DCIS.

Optimisation of DNA and RNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed tissue.

Archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is an invaluable resource for molecular genetic studies but the extraction of high quality nucleic acid may be problematic. We have optimised DNA extraction by comparing 10 protocols, including a commercially available kit and a novel method that utilises a thermal cycler. The thermal cycler and Chelex-100 extraction method yielded DNA capable of amplification by PCR from every block and 61% of sections versus 54% using microwave and Chelex-100, 15% with classical xylene-based extraction and 60% of sections using the kit. Successful RNA extraction was observed, by beta-actin amplification, in 83.7% sections for samples treated by the thermal cycler and Chelex-100 method. Thermal cycler and Chelex-100 extraction of nucleic acid is reliable, quick and inexpensive.

How to draw the skin ellipse for a mastectomy.

The size of the skin ellipse for a mastectomy varies between patients and the accurate marking and tailoring of the skin flaps is often learnt by the surgical trainee only with increasing experience. Within the Breast Unit, a mathematical model was calculated to predict the required width of the skin ellipse for a successful mastectomy. Measurements of the straight-line distance from mid-clavicular point to the infra-mammary fold and maximum vertical height of the nipple above the infra-mammary fold were taken with the patient relaxed and supine. A close correlation (r = 0.85) was noted. Further analysis demonstrated a linear relationship between the pre-operative height to which the nipple could be suspended above the infra-mammary fold and the required maximum skin ellipse width (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). This linear relationship is easy to remember and is a useful check to ensure that the skin flaps intended will be just right. This same technique may be applicable to skin ellipses elsewhere.