Safety and effectiveness of therapeutic magnetic resonance in diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy and safety of therapeutic magnetic resonance (TMR) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), the authors designed a prospective randomised controlled trial in three highly specialised diabetic foot clinics. METHOD: All the patients consecutively visited in a period of 18 months were screened according to the inclusion (presence of an ulcer >1 cm2 in the foot lasting at least 6 weeks; ABPI>0.6; consent to participate in the study) and exclusion (Charcot's foot; local or systemic infections; chronic renal failure; any wearable electrically-driven life-supporting device) criteria. Patients, who were treated according to international guideline protocols, were randomised into two groups: group A received for four weeks the sham application of TMR, while group B received the active TMR for the same period. People were followed-up to 10 weeks and healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), rate of granulation tissue on wound bed (% GT), reduction of the area of the lesion (∆AL) and a score (0-3) evaluating erythema, oedema, pain and tenderness, respectively, were measured. Adverse events (AE) were registered and monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: No differences were observed in HR, HT and ∆AL between the two groups during follow-up, while % GT and the scores for erythema, oedema and pain at 10 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements in group B compared with group A and versus baseline. When restricted to non-ischaemic patients (ABPI>0.8), ∆AL was significantly (p<0.05) more pronounced in group B than in group A. No difference in AE occurrence was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study, despite not being able to demonstrate the effectiveness of TMR on healing rate at 10 weeks, with 4 weeks of active treatment in neuro-ischaemic DFUs, shows positive effects on clinical aspects of the DFU and is associated with a significant increase of GT in the wound bed. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The study has been fully sponsored by Thereson S.p.A., manufacturer of TMR devices.

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae rectal colonization is a risk factor for mortality in patients with diabetic foot infections.

To evaluate the relationship between carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) gut colonization and mortality in diabetic patients with a foot infection (DFI) we performed a single-centre, retrospective, matched case-control study. In the study period, we identified 21 patients with DFI who had KPC-Kp gut colonization and 21 controls. The 90-day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with colonized guts (47%) than the controls (4%) (p 0.013). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that gut colonization with KPC-Kp was the only independent predictor of mortality: odds ratio 13.33, 95% CI 1.90-272.80, p 0.024. In patients with DFI, KPC-Kp gut colonization appears to be an important risk factor for mortality.

Pancreas transplant alone has beneficial effects on retinopathy in type 1 diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The effects of successful pancreas transplant alone (PTA) on chronic complications of diabetes, in particular diabetic retinopathy, remain disputed. We prospectively studied the course of diabetic retinopathy in PTA recipients and in non-transplanted (non-PTA) type 1 diabetic patients. METHODS: The PTA and non-PTA groups consisted respectively of 33 (follow-up: 30 +/- 11 months) and 35 patients (follow-up: 28 +/- 10 months). Best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, ophthalmoscopy, retinal photographs, and in selected cases angiography were performed. Diabetic retinopathy and its improvement/deterioration were assessed according to criteria proposed by the Eurodiab Study. RESULTS: At baseline, 9% of PTA and 6% of non-PTA patients had no diabetic retinopathy, 24 and 29% had non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), whereas 67 and 66% had laser-treated and/or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (LT/PDR), respectively. No new case of diabetic retinopathy occurred in either group during follow-up. In the NPDR PTA group, 50% of patients improved by one grading, and 50% showed no change. In the LT/PDR PTA, stabilisation was observed in 86% of cases, whereas worsening of retinopathy occurred in 14% of patients. In the NPDR non-PTA group, diabetic retinopathy improved in 20% of patients, remained unchanged in 10%, and worsened in the remaining 70%. In the LT/PDR non-PTA group, retinopathy did not change in 43% and deteriorated in 57% of patients. Overall, the percentage of patients with improved or stabilised diabetic retinopathy was significantly higher in the PTA group. No differences were found between the two groups with regard to cataract lesions and intraocular pressure values. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Despite a relatively short follow-up, our study shows that successful PTA can positively affect the course of diabetic retinopathy.

Neoral versus prograf in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with portal venous drainage: three-year results of a single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The preferential use of tacrolimus (Prograf) over cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is mainly based on historical, retrospective studies. We herein report the 3-year results of a single-center, prospective, randomized comparison of the two calcineurin inhibitors in the setting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppression and portal drainage of pancreas allografts. METHODS: Between May 2001 and August 2004, 47 SPKTx recipients who were stratified by recipient sex, were alternatively assigned to treatment with Neoral (n = 22) or Prograf (n = 25). Concurrent immunosuppression included induction treatment with basiliximab and maintenance with MMF and steroids. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 24.0 months, all patients remained in the study arm into which they were initially enrolled. No pancreas rejection episode was observed. One acute kidney rejection was recorded in the Neoral arm (4.5%) as compared with 7 (28.0%) including one steroid-resistant episode, in the Prograf arm (P = .03). The cumulative incidence of adverse events was 31.8% (n = 7) in the Neoral arm compared with 92.0% (n = 23) in the Prograf arm (P < .0001). One patient died in each study arm. Patient, pancreas, and kidney survivals overlapped at 1- and 3-years posttransplant, namely all 95.4% for the Neoral arm compared with 95.8%, 91.8%, and 95.8%, respectively, for the Prograf arm (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in MMF-based immunosuppression there is no convincing evidence that Prograf should be preferred to Neoral in SPKTx.

Ninety-five percent insulin independence rate 3 years after pancreas transplantation alone with portal-enteric drainage.

AIMS: Portal-enteric drainage (PED) might be particularly suitable for pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), since it has been associated with an immunologic advantage and achieves excellent metabolic results. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of 40 PTAs with PED. METHODS: Between April 2001 and March 2004, 40 consecutive PTAs were performed with PED. Recipients were selected according to the American Diabetic Association recommendations. Donors were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although matching for A and B loci was considered at the time of graft allocation. Immunosuppression consisted of induction treatment with basiliximab (n = 34) or thymoglobulin (n = 6), and maintenance therapy with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 690 minutes (range, 517-965 min) all pancreases functioned immediately. Three grafts were lost due to hyperacute or accelerated rejection. No graft was lost to vascular thrombosis, although 5 (12.5%) nonocclusive thromboses were identified and the grafts were rescued with intravenous heparin infusion. A repeat laparotomy was required in 7 recipients (17.5%) No patient required multiple repeat laparotomies, and none died. After a mean follow-up of 16.4 months (range, 1-36 mo), 2 recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes, which were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 3-year patient, and graft survival rates were 100% and 94.9%, respectively. The following parameters showed significant improvement compared with pretransplantation evaluation: hemoglobin A1C concentration, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, arterial blood pressure, cardiac performance, retinopathy, proteinuria, and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation alone with PED provides high rates of long-term insulin-independence.

Successful solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage following unsuccessful islet cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There are no data regarding the outcome of solitary pancreas transplantation (SPT) with portal venous drainage (PVD) following unsuccessful islet transplantation (ITx) after multiple islet injections into the portal vein. We herein describe the outcome of three SPTs with PVD performed after failed ITx. METHODS: Between October 2002 and December 2003, three SPTs with PVD were performed following unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal islet injections (mean 2.3 injections: range 2 to 3 injections) in two women and one man, aged 26, 49, and 60 years. Panel reactive antibody titer was 0% in all recipients. Immunosuppression was based on induction with either basiliximab (n = 2) or thymoglobulin (n = 1); maintenance therapy included steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. During the recipient operation, the absence of venous hypertension was established by direct measurement of portal pressure, before making the final decision to drain the pancreas into the portal vein. RESULTS: Portal pressures were 16 cm H2O, 14 cm H2O, and 13 cm H2O. Pancreas grafts were reperfused after a period of cold preservation of 638, 695, and 835 minutes, respectively. All grafts showed immediate endocrine function, maintaining their recipients insulin-independent for longest follow-ups of 8, 21, and 23 months, respectively. One recipient developed a nonocclusive venous thrombus that resolved with intravenous heparin infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed that unsuccessful ITx with multiple intraportal injections does not necessarily preclude the possibility of subsequent successful SPT with PVD. Further experience is needed to define contraindications and possible complications of SPT with PVD following ITx.

Portal enteric-drained solitary pancreas transplantation without surveillance biopsy: is it safe?

BACKGROUND: Most solitary pancreas transplants (SPTx) fail due to unrecognized rejection episodes. Consequently, SPTx are monitored by drainage into the bladder or by surveillance biopsies. METHODS: Between April 2001 and June 2003, a consecutive series of 48 SPTx were performed using portal enteric drainage (PED). Rejection episodes were diagnosed empirically, based on the elevated pancreatic enzymes without a surveillance biopsy. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab (n = 42) or ATG (n = 6), low-dose steroids, MMF, and tacrolimus. Donors (mean age 28.9 year; range 9 to 54 year) were selected according to standard criteria irrespective of HLA match, although the best HLA matching was considered at the time of graft allocation. RESULTS: After a mean cold ischemia time of 676 minutes (range 475 to 900 minutes), all but two pancreata (95.8%) functioned immediately. Relaparotomy was required in seven cases (14.6%). Three grafts were lost in the early posttransplant period due to hyperacute rejection. Two additional grafts were lost later due to arterial thrombosis or to chronic rejection. After a median follow-up period of 12.2 months (range 0.2 to 27 months) three further recipients were diagnosed with rejection episodes that were reversed with steroid boluses. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 93.1% and 2-year figures 100% and 88.7%, respectively. At the longest follow-up no recipient was diagnosed with a malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: With current immunosuppression protocols SPTx achieves high rates of insulin independence even without surveillance biopsy or routine use of T-cell-depleting therapies.

Echocardiographic evaluation in type 1 diabetic patients on waiting list for isolated pancreas or kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Type 1 diabetic patients may display abnormalities of left ventricular geometry and systolic and diastolic function. Patients on the waiting list for solitary pancreas or kidney-pancreas transplantation were evaluated by Doppler echocardiography to assess left ventricular geometry and systolic and diastolic function, and correlate these parameters with clinical characteristics. We evaluated 78 patients including 45 men with an overall mean age of 39.5 +/- 7.2 years and a disease duration of 24 +/- 9.8 years. Among these 78 patients, 13 showed isolated retinopathy, 9 isolated arterial hypertension, 45 concomitant retinopathy and hypertension and overt nephropathy, while 11 were free of complications. The results of our study showed an increased left ventricular mass and abnormal diastolic function among patients with simultaneous target organ complications and with hypertension, as has been reported in many previous studies. In contrast study patients with no complications showed normal left ventricular structure and function. This finding conflicts with data from several reports in the medical literature in which diastolic impairment was present in type 1 diabetic patients at an early stage of disease and with no evident microvascular and macrovascular complications.

Pancreas transplantation from marginal donors.

BACKGROUND: Marginal donor organs are a supplementary source of grafts that has not been fully exploited for pancreas transplantation (PTx). METHODS: A total of 100 PTx were performed with grafts procured from either 48 nonmarginal donors (NMD) or 52 marginal donors (MD), namely age greater than 45 years and/or severe hemodynamic instability at the time of procurement. PTx outcome was evaluated as the incidence of delayed endocrine pancreas function (DEPF), the complication rate, and the patient and graft survivals. RESULTS: The DEPF rate was 6.2% for NMD as compared to 0 for MD (P >.05). Relaparotomy rate was 12.5% for NMD and 9.6% for MD (P >.05). Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% and 94.2% for NMD and MD, respectively (P >.05). Equivalent figures for patients were 97.9% and 98.1%, respectively (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas from MD may be safely employed and significantly expand the donor pool for PTx.

Pancreas transplant alone.

Pancreas transplant alone (PTA) represents a growing proportion of overall pancreas transplantations, with 1-year patient and graft survivals of almost 100% and higher than 80%, respectively. PTA can restore normoglycemia without exogenous insulin administration and eliminate acute diabetic complications. In our series of 28 PTA, performed with portal-enteric drainage, 2-year patient and pancreas survivals were 100% and 87%, respectively. In patients with successful transplantation, rapid normalization of blood glucose level and HbA1c concentration was observed, due to restored endogenous insulin secretion. Several classical cardiovascular risk factors were measured before and after transplant, with significant improvements shortly after transplantation. Diabetic retinopathy improved in 58.8% of examined eyes, stabilized in 35.3%, and worsened in 5.9%. In conclusion, PTA represents a clinically relevant option for patients with type 1 diabetes without advanced renal disease. It restores normoglycemia in the vast majority of patients and seems to have a positive impact on late diabetic complications.

Retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage.

BACKGROUND: Portal-enteric drainage (PED) is the latest refinement in the surgical technique for pancreas transplantation (PTx). We herein describe the results of a modified technique for PED that places the pancreas in a totally retroperitoneal position. METHODS: Between April 2001 and June 2003, 79 PTx were performed using a retroperitoneal PED technique. RESULTS: No graft was lost due to surgical complications and the relaparotomy rate was 11.4%. Mean hospital stay averaged 25.9 days (+/-14.4 days) with a 30-day readmission rate of 12.7%. One graft was lost due to delayed (6 months) arterial thrombosis and three to acute rejection. The overall 1-year patient and graft survivals were 98.7% and 93.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that PED of pancreas grafts is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. Whether retroperitoneal graft placement has actual advantages over the "classical" intraperitoneal position remains to be ascertained.

Solitary pancreas transplantation: preliminary findings about early reduction of proteinuria in incipient or evident diabetic type I nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Our work was aimed to evaluate the precocious reduction of proteinuria in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus type 1 with incipient and evident nephropathy after isolated pancreas transplantation (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 2000 to March 2003, we followed 24 PTA grafts in 24 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (mean age 37.8 years; mean duration of diabetes 24.8 years). The pancreas was transplanted with portal-enteric drainage in 23 patients and systemic-enteric in 1 patient. The immunosuppressive therapy used basilixmab induction and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mophetil (MMF), and low dose steroid maintenance therapy. The renal function, proteinuria, and the glucose metabolic parameters were evaluated before and during the following months after transplant. RESULTS: All patients are alive and twenty-one have a well-functioning pancreas with three grafts lost. All patients had persistence of normal renal function. Before transplantation 12 patients displayed proteinuria that was clearly reduced in 11 and gone in three patients, all of whom were insulin-independent. CONCLUSIONS: TPA seems to reduce, and in some cases to regress, the proteinuria associated with early diabetic nephropathy.

Reducing insulin resistance with metformin: the evidence today.

Insulin resistance, defined as the inability of insulin to exert a normal biological action at the level of its target tissues, is one of the principal pathogenetic defects of type 2 diabetes. Metformin, the most widely-prescribed insulin-sensitizing agent in current clinical use, improves blood glucose control mainly by improving insulin-mediated suppression of hepatic glucose production, and by enhancing insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle. Experimental studies show that metformin-mediated improvements in insulin sensitivity may be associated with several mechanisms, including increased insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity, enhanced glycogen synthesis, and an increase in the recruitment and activity of GLUT4 glucose transporters. In adipose tissue, metformin promotes the re-esterification of free fatty acids and inhibits lipolysis, which may indirectly improve insulin sensitivity through reduced lipotoxicity. The improved glycaemia with metformin is not associated with increased circulating levels of insulin, and the risk of hypoglycaemia with metformin is minimal. The therapeutic profile of metformin supports its use for the control of blood glucose, in diabetic patients and for the prevention of diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Moreover, the improvement by metformin of cardiovascular risk factors associated with the dysmetabolic syndrome may account for the significant improvements in macrovascular outcomes observed in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study.

Dissociation between carotid artery lesions and lipid parameters in recipients of successful kidney graft.

BACKGROUND: The relationships between lipid levels and atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries in kidney graft recipients are still unclear. METHODS: We evaluated carotid morphology in 53 recipients of functioning renal transplantation, and studied the relationship of carotid artery wall lesions with relevant clinical and laboratory risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The patients were on stable, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: The main clinical characteristics of patients were: age, 46.5 +/- 10.1 years; males/females, 40/13; body mass index, 25.8 +/- 4.4 kg/m2; duration of transplantation, 43 +/- 52 months. Ultrasonographic scanning of carotid arteries showed the presence of lesions (intimal-media thickness and/or plaque) in 28 patients (52.8%). These recipients differed from patients without carotid lesions in terms of age (50.4 +/- 9.0 vs 42.2 +/- 9.7 years, p < 0.01) and duration of pre-transplant dialysis (4.6 +/- 3.4 vs 2.3 +/- 1.9 years, p < 0.01), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed as for total cholesterol (230 +/- 44 vs 235 +/- 35 mg/dl), LDL-cholesterol (142 +/- 32 vs 143 +/- 30 mg/dl), HDL-cholesterol (52 +/- 12 vs 58 +/- 20 mg/dl) and triglycerides (178 +/- 94 vs 167 +/- 89 mg/dl). The percentage of post-transplant diabetes was 3-fold higher in patients with carotid lesions (25 vs 8%). No difference was observed as for the following parameters: body mass index, duration of transplantation, fibrinogen levels, DDimer concentrations, reactive C-protein values, prevalence of hypertension, percentage of smokers vs non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the view that carotid artery lesions in kidney graft recipients on stable, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy may not be related to circulating lipid values.