Effects of potassium or potassium/magnesium supplementation on potassium content of body tissues and fluids in furosemide-treated rats on magnesium-deficient or magnesium-sufficient diet.

Persistent Mg2+ deficiency may interfere with restoration of normal tissue K+ levels. This study examined: a) the effects of chronic furosemide treatment on K+ of sartorius, aorta and ventricle of rats fed Mg2(+)-deficient (100 ppm) or Mg2(+)-sufficient (400 ppm) diet and deionized water; b) whether normal tissue K+ is restored by oral K+ or K+/Mg2+ supplementation with continued furosemide therapy. Levels of Mg2+ were also measured. Furosemide (20 mg/kg i.p.) decreased K+ in sartorius, aorta and ventricle by 5.5, 4.3 and 19.9 microEq/gm (p less than .05), respectively, in rats fed 100 ppm Mg2+ diet. Furosemide did not alter K+ levels in rats fed 400 ppm Mg2+ diet. K+ supplementation (1 mEq/kg for 7 days) restored K+ to normal in sartorius but the addition of Mg2+ supplementation was necessary to restore K+ levels to normal in ventricle and aorta. These data indicate that furosemide can decrease tissue K+ in rats on a Mg2(+)-deficient diet. This decrease can be reversed during diuretic administration by K+ supplementation in sartorius, or K+ plus Mg2+ supplementation in ventricle and aorta.

Effects of metoprolol, alone and in combination with lidocaine, on ventricular fibrillation threshold: comparison with atenolol, propranolol, and pindolol.

Metoprolol and other beta-adrenergic blocking drugs are known to exert cardioprotective effects that include significant reduction in occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) following myocardial ischemia and infarction. To help determine the mechanism of these cardioprotective effects, this study evaluated the effect of equipotent beta-blocking doses of metoprolol and three other beta-blockers with differing ancillary properties on ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) in the normal canine heart. Metoprolol tartrate (1.0 mg/kg i.v.), atenolol (0.3 mg/kg i.v.), propranolol hydrochloride (0.3 mg/kg i.v.), pindolol (0.03 mg/kg i.v.), or saline control (0.9% NaCl solution; vehicle) was given, alone and in combination with lidocaine (L), to groups of six pentobarbital (32.5 mg/kg i.v.) anesthetized mongrel dogs after control VFT and control isoproterenol-induced (ISO) positive chronotropic effects had been determined. The D- (membrane stabilizing, non-beta blocking) and L- (beta blocking) isomers of propranolol also were administered to separate groups of six anesthetized dogs in a dose of 0.3 mg/kg i.v. Blood samples (venous) were taken before drug or vehicle administration, 10 min after drug/vehicle administration and at half-hour intervals thereafter during experimentation. ISO responses and VFT were determined 5 and 15 min, respectively, after drug/vehicle administration and at half-hour intervals for a total experimental period of 165 min. VF was induced with a train of pulses (5 s, 100 Hz, 3-ms duration, 250-omega resistance) applied by bipolar platinum electrodes to a paced heart (200 beats/min). Voltage (V) was increased every 60 sec (0.25-V increments between 0-3.5 V and 0.5-V increments greater than 3.5 V) until VF occurred. Metoprolol increased VFT significantly (p less than 0.05) and maximally (max delta V = 2.3 +/- 0.7 V) at 135 min postdrug when the ISO-induced increase in heart rate was inhibited (%I ISO) by less than 53%. Max delta V was not significantly increased following i.v. administration of atenolol (0.8 +/- 0.6 V), pindolol (0.1 +/- 0.1 V), or saline (0.1 +/- 0.1 V). Max delta V was 0.5 +/- 0.2 in the D-propranolol-treated group and 0.5 +/- 0.3 in the L-propranolol-treated group. These values did not differ from max delta V obtained in the propranolol-treated group (0.6 +/- 0.4 V). Changes in VFT for all groups were, over time, negatively correlated with %I ISO and were not dependent on membrane stabilizing effect (metoprolol, propranolol (D,DL), pindolol), intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (pindolol), or cardioselectivity (metoprolol, atenolol).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)