Left Ventricular Non-Compaction in Athletes: To Play or Not to Play.

Isolated left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) has usually been viewed as a rare cardiomyopathy in athletes. However, with advances in diagnostic imaging techniques and increased use of pre-participation screening electrocardiograms (ECGs), apparent LVNC is being recognized in an increasing number of athletes. Given the lack of a true gold standard for diagnosis, significant debate continues regarding optimal diagnostic criteria. There are increasing data to support the possibility of over-diagnosing this cardiomyopathy in an athletic population due to the physiologic adaptation to the extreme preload and afterload characteristic of intense athletic participation. This appears to be particularly true in African-American or African-Caribbean athletes. The most common presenting symptom in the athlete with true LVNC is exertional syncope. Evaluation of the at-risk athlete will typically include a complete history, with attention to cardiac symptoms, family history of premature cardiovascular disease or sudden cardiac death (SCD), physical examination, 12-lead ECG, two-dimensional echocardiography, and, in some cases, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium contrast. In addition, stress echocardiography, 24- to 48-h Holter monitoring, or 30-day event monitoring for arrhythmias may be necessary to fully evaluate the athlete's risk. Adverse outcomes with LVNC include ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmias, syncope, SCD, and thromboembolism. Asymptomatic athletes with hypertrabeculation of the left ventricle but normal ventricular function likely do not require restrictions on activity. Symptomatic individuals who meet criteria for LVNC, especially those with abnormal ventricular function and exercise-induced symptoms or arrhythmias, should be prohibited from participating in vigorous sports activities.

Preparticipation cardiovascular screening among National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I institutions.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac arrest is the leading cause of death in competitive athletes during sport, and screening strategies for the prevention of sudden cardiac death are debated. The purpose of this study was to assess the incorporation of routine non-invasive cardiovascular screening (NICS), such as ECG or echocardiography, in Division I collegiate preparticipation examinations. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of current screening practices sent to the head athletic trainer of all National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football programmes listed in the National Athletic Trainers' Association directory. RESULTS: Seventy-four of 116 (64%) programmes responded. Thirty-five of 74 (47%) of responding schools have incorporated routine NICS testing. ECG is the primary modality for NICS in 31 (42%) of schools, and 17 (49%) also utilise echocardiography. Sixty-four per cent of the programmes that do NICS routinely screen their athletes only once as incoming freshmen. Of institutions that do not conduct NICS, American Heart Association guidelines against routine NICS and cost were the most common reasons reported. CONCLUSIONS: While substantial debate exists regarding protocols for cardiovascular screening in athletes, nearly half of NCAA Division I football programmes in this study already incorporate NICS into their preparticipation screening programme. Additional research is needed to understand the impact of NICS in collegiate programmes.

Imaging in sports medicine: an overview.

Increasing sports participation, and the inevitable sports injury, is a significant contributor to total healthcare expenditure in the United States. With sports-related injury ever increasing, and technology rapidly expanding in the areas of diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal trauma, a continual revisiting of the latest in technology is critical for the sports physician. Advances particularly in the areas of magnetic resonance imaging, diagnostic office ultrasound, and 3-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography, offer the clinician a myriad of diagnostic options in patient evaluation. Care must be exercised, however, as one pursues additional radiographic data in the patient care arena. The information must be interpreted with a firm foundation and understanding of not only the patient history and physical examination, but also the availability, indications, contraindications, sensitivity, specificity, and even the cost implications of the great spectrum of diagnostic options.

Return to activity considerations in a football player predisposed to exertional heat illness: a case study.

CONTEXT: Heat illness is the third leading cause of death in athletics and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in exercising athletes. Once faced with a case of heat related illness, severe or mild, the health care professional is often faced with the question of when to reactivate the athlete for competitive sport. Resuming activity without modifying risk factors could lead to recurrence of heat related illness of similar or greater severity. Also, having had heat illness in and of itself may be a risk factor for future heat related illness. The decision to return the athlete and the process of risk reduction is complex and requires input from all of the components of the team. Involving the entire sports medicine team often allows for the safest, most successful return to play strategy. Care must be taken once the athlete does begin to return to activity to allow for re-acclimatization to exercise in the heat prior to resumption particularly following a long convalescent period after more severe heat related illness.