PD-L1 expression complements CALGB prognostic scoring system in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Background: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker in patients with lung cancer, but its role in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains unclear. Evidence suggests that higher PD-L1 expression is correlated with worse survival. CALGB is the main scoring system used to predict the benefit of chemotherapy treatment. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and its addition to CALGB scoring system in patients with MPM. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated samples with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic MPM. PD-L1 Tumor Proportional Score (TPS) was determined by immunohistochemistry at diagnosis. Results: 73 patients were included in this study. A cutoff value of 15 was set for a high or low PD-L1 TPS. In total, 71.2% (n=52) and 28.8% (n=21) of individuals harbored low or high PD-L1 expression, respectively. PD-L1High was associated with worse median progression-free Survival (mPFS) [4.9 vs. 10.8 months; HR 2.724, 95% CI (1.44-5.14); p = 0.002] and Overall Survival (OS) [6.0 vs. 20.9 months; HR 6.87, 95% CI (3.4-8.7); p<0.001] compared to patients with PD-L1Low. Multivariate analysis confirmed that PD-L1 expression was an independent factor for PFS and OS in patients with MPM and CALGB score of 5-6. Conclusion: PD-L1 addition to CALGB scale improves its prognostic estimation of MPM survival and should be considered in future research.

HOLA COVID-19 Study: Evaluating the Impact of Caring for Patients With COVID-19 on Cancer Care Delivery in Latin America.

PURPOSE: The HOLA COVID-19 study sought to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on oncology practices across Latin America (LATAM), challenges faced by physicians, and how practices and physicians adapted while delivering care to patients with cancer. METHODS: This international cross-sectional study of oncology physicians in LATAM included a 43-item anonymous online survey to evaluate changes and adaptations to clinical practice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of caring for patients with COVID-19 and changes to clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 704 oncology physicians from 19 countries completed the survey. Among respondents, the most common specialty was general oncology (34%) and 56% of physicians had cared for patients with COVID-19. The majority of physicians (70%) noted a decrease in the number of new patients evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with prepandemic, and 73% reported adopting the use of telemedicine in their practice. More than half (58%) of physicians reported making changes to the treatments that they offered to patients with cancer. In adjusted models, physicians who had cared for patients with COVID-19 had higher odds of changing the type of chemotherapy or treatments that they offered (adjusted odds ratio 1.81; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.53) and of delaying chemotherapy start (adjusted odds ratio 2.05; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.81). Physicians identified significant delays in access to radiation and surgical services, diagnostic tests, and supportive care. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted global cancer care. Although changes to health care delivery are a necessary response to this global crisis, our study highlights the significant disruption and changes to the treatment plans of patients with cancer in LATAM resulting from the COVID-19 health care crisis.

Association of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Reduction With Progression-free and Overall Survival Improvement in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer elevates serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CEA determinations are not recommended currently. This study aims to identify the correlation between reducing serum CEA levels with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. METHODS: This study assessed at baseline and in every scheduled visit serum CEA levels throughout first-line therapy. A sensitivity and specificity analysis identified the best cut-off point and correlated it with progression-free survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were conducted. RESULTS: We assessed 748 patients with elevated serum CEA levels at diagnosis. A ≥20% decrease from baseline was associated with a 2-fold median survival compared with patients with lower decreases (20.5 months vs 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to -0.64; P < .001). CEA sensitivity and specificity to predict survival was 79.8% and 59.8%, respectively. A ≥10% decrease in CEA concentrations was associated with longer progression-free survival (7.7 months vs 5.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to -0.88; P = .001) in those treated with chemotherapy, and in patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.9 months vs 7.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to -0.83; P = .0001) and a ≥20% decrease. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with an elevated baseline CEA level, the percentage decrease of CEA concentrations above the threshold during the first-line therapy was associated with more prolonged survival and progression-free intervals. Serum CEA determinations are a feasible, noninvasive option for monitoring and prognosis.

Genetic Ancestry Contributes to Somatic Mutations in Lung Cancers from Admixed Latin American Populations.

Inherited lung cancer risk, particularly in nonsmokers, is poorly understood. Genomic and ancestry analysis of 1,153 lung cancers from Latin America revealed striking associations between Native American ancestry and their somatic landscape, including tumor mutational burden, and specific driver mutations in EGFR, KRAS, and STK11. A local Native American ancestry risk score was more strongly correlated with EGFR mutation frequency compared with global ancestry correlation, suggesting that germline genetics (rather than environmental exposure) underlie these disparities. SIGNIFICANCE: The frequency of somatic EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung cancer varies by ethnicity, but we do not understand why. Our study suggests that the variation in EGFR and KRAS mutation frequency is associated with genetic ancestry and suggests further studies to identify germline alleles that underpin this association.See related commentary by Gomez et al., p. 534.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 521.

Anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase III randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were identified after systematic review of databases and conference proceedings. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled HR for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response. The pooled OR for overall response and treatment-related side effects were calculated using the inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was measured using the τ2 and I2 statistics. RESULTS: After the systematic review, we included four phase III RCTs (n=2737) in this meta-analysis. The use of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 agents (atezolizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) was associated with better OS in comparison with docetaxel alone (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75; p<0.00001). Similarly, the PFS and duration of response was significantly longer for patients receiving immunotherapy (HR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96; p=0.007 and HR:0.32; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.43; p<0.00001, respectively) versus single agent chemotherapy. The overall response rate was also higher for patients who received any anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in comparison with docetaxel (OR: 1.77; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.50; p=0.001). Regarding treatment-related side effects grade 3 or higher, patients who received immunotherapy experienced less events than patients allocated to docetaxel (OR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.30; p<0.00001). CONCLUSION: The use of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in patients with progressive advanced NSCLC is significantly better than the use of docetaxel in terms of OS, PFS, duration of response and overall response rate.

An international epidemiological analysis of young patients with non-small cell lung cancer (AduJov-CLICaP).

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients with NSCLC is diagnosed at 40 years or younger. These patients tend to be never-smokers, usually present with stage IV adenocarcinoma, and have somatic genomic alterations. Few studies have documented and analyzed epidemiological characteristics of this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an international epidemiological analysis of 389 young patients with NSCLC. Data was collected from centers participating in the Latin American Consortium for Lung Cancer Research (AduJov-CLICaP). Patients were identified and data was retrospectively collected from different Latin American countries and Canada (Argentina=6, Canada=19, Colombia=29, Costa Rica=9, Mexico=219, Nicaragua=2, Panama=19, Perú=76 and Venezuela=10). The period of study was from 2012 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were: age 40 years or less and a histologically confirmed NSCLC. Clinical data was obtained, and EGFR mutation status and EML4-ALK translocation were collected. RESULTS: NSCLC patients aged 40 years or less accounted for approximately 4% of the total NSCLC population. Female patients accounted for 54.5%, while median age was of 37 years. Adenocarcinoma accounted for 86.1% (n=335/389), 72.5% (n=282/389; unknown=5) of patients were non-smokers, and 90.3% (n=351/389) had stage IV disease. Site of metastasis was obtained from 260/351 (unknown=91) stage IV patients (lung metastasis=40.0%, CNS metastasis=35.7%, and bone metastasis=31.5%). OS for the total population was 17.3 months (95%CI=13.9-20.7). OS for EGFRm(+)=31.4months (95%CI=11.6-51.3), EGFRm(-)=14.5months (95%CI=11.0-17.9) (p=0.005). OS for alk(+)=9.8months (95%CI=3.1-16.5) and alk(-)=5.6months (95%CI=3.9-7.3) (p=0.315). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 40 years or less account for a small but important proportion of NSCLC cases. Younger patients may have different characteristics compared to the older population. EGFRm and EML4-alk translocation frequency is higher than that of the general population.

Immunotherapy Comes of Age in Lung Cancer.

Lung carcinoma is the leading cause of death by cancer worldwide. When possible, surgery is the best treatment strategy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. However, even with curative-intent therapy, most patients will develop local or systemic recurrence and, ultimately, succumb to their disease. In recent years, evidence on the role of the antitumor activity of the immune system and the understanding of tumor immunosurveillance have resulted in the emergence of immunotherapy as a promising therapeutic approach in lung cancer. The main approaches are immune checkpoint inhibition, such as blockade of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed cell death-1 receptors and the programmed cell death-1 ligand, and vaccine therapy, which elicits specific antitumor immunity against relevant tumor-associated antigens. We have reviewed recently reported results from clinical trials and the possible future role of vaccine therapy and immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of small cell lung cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer.

BIM deletion polymorphisms in Hispanic patients with non-small cell lung cancer carriers of EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Germline alterations in the proapoptotic protein Bcl-2-like 11 (BIM) can have a crucial role in diverse tumors. To determine the clinical utility of detecting BIM deletion polymorphisms (par4226 bp/ par363 bp) in EGFR positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) we examined the outcomes of patients with and without BIM alterations. RESULTS: BIM deletion was present in 14 patients (15.7%). There were no significant differences between patients with and without BIM-del in clinical characteristics or EGFR mutation type; however, those with BIM-del had a worse overall response rate (ORR) to erlotinib (42.9% vs. 73.3% in patients without BIM-del; p=0.024) as well as a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (10.8 BIM-del+ vs. 21.7 months for patients without BIM-del; p=0.029) and overall survival (OS) (15.5 BIM-del+ vs. 34.0 months for patients without BIM-del; p=0.035). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BIM-del+ was an independent indicator of shorter PFS (HR 3.0; 95%CI 1.2-7.6; p=0.01) and OS (HR 3.4; 95%CI 1.4-8.3; p=0.006). METHODS: We studied 89 NSCLC Hispanic patients with EGFR mutation who were treated with erlotinib between January 2009 and November 2014. BIM deletion polymorphisms (BIM-del) was analyzed by PCR in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of tumor biopsies. We retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, response rate, toxicity, and outcomes among patients with and without BIM-del. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of BIM-del found in Hispanic patients is similar to that previously described in Asia. This alteration is associated with a poor clinical response to erlotinib and represents an independent prognostic factor for patients who had NSCLC with an EGFR mutation.

Updated Frequency of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer in Latin America: The Latin-American Consortium for the Investigation of Lung Cancer (CLICaP).

INTRODUCTION: Previously, we reported the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Latin America. The EGFR mutation frequency was found between Asian (40%) and Caucasian (15%) populations. Here, we report the updated distribution of NSCLC mutations. METHODS: A total of 5738 samples from NSCLC patients from Argentina (1713), Mexico (1417), Colombia (1939), Peru (393), Panama (174), and Costa Rica (102) were genotyped for EGFR and KRAS. RESULTS: The median patient age was 62.2 ± 12.3 years; 53.5% were women, 46.7% had a history of smoking, and 95.2% had adenocarcinoma histology. The frequency of EGFR mutations was 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9-27.1; Argentina, 14.4% [12.8-15.6]; México, 34.3% [31.9-36.7]; Colombia, 24.7% [22.8-26.6]; Peru, 51.1% [46.2-55.9]; Panamá, 27.3 [20.7-33.9]; and Costa Rica, 31.4% [22.4-40.4]). The frequency of KRAS mutations was 14.0% (9.1-18.9). In patients with adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutations were independently associated with gender (30.7% females vs. 18.4% males; p < 0.001), nonsmoker status (27.4% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001), ethnicity (mestizo/indigenous, 35.3% vs. Caucasian, 13.7%, p < 0.001), and the absence of KRAS mutation (38.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001). The overall response rate to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors was 60.6% (95% CI, 52-69), with a median progression-free survival and overall survival of 15.9 (95% CI, 12.420.6) and 32 months (95% CI, 26.5-37.6), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the genetic heterogeneity of NSCLC in Latin America, confirming that the frequency of EGFR mutations is intermediate between that observed in the Asian and Caucasian populations.

Mutations in NSCLC and their link with lung cancer-associated thrombosis: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The association of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and lung cancer is highly prevalent. Additionally, the occurrence of a VTE with cancer has been associated with a worse prognosis and a poor quality of life. Underlying cancer biological features such as tumour mutations may contribute to VTE risk and cancer prognosis. Since preclinical data suggest a link between thrombosis and KRAS mutations in tumours, we aimed to validate this association in a patient registry cohort. METHODS: A retrospective case control study was performed using the CHUM NSCLC registry. Cases had VTE occurring 6months previous to or after a diagnosis of NSCLC. Diagnosis of VTE (venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and migratory superficial thrombophlebitis) was confirmed by a review of the imaging reports. Controls were patients with NSCLC without thrombosis matched for age and stage (I-IIIA/IIIB-IV). Exclusion criteria included insufficient tissue for KRAS/EGFR mutation analysis or insufficient clinical information. RESULTS: Between Jan 2000 and Dec 2009 a total of 57 cases with VTE and 102 controls without VTE were included. The OR for thrombosis in KRAS and EGFR mutated NSCLC patients are respectively 2.67 (1.12-6.42; p=0.014) and 0.99 (0.27-3.48; p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: KRAS mutation is associated with an increased risk of VTE in this NSCLC cohort. These findings are consistent with preclinical studies. Prospective data on VTE rates from clinical trials with molecularly defined NSCLC are needed to confirm these findings.

Lung cancer associated venous thromboembolic disease: a comprehensive review.

The association of cancer and thrombotic events was first described by Trousseau in 1865. The spectrum of these episodes vary in severity, and these can present during or even prior to the diagnosis of cancer. Multiple factors in patients with lung cancer are associated with a higher risk of thrombosis. Patient-related, cancer-related and treatment-related factors contribute to the development of a thrombotic event. The incidence of thrombotic events in patients with lung cancer is one of the highest among all cancers. Certain particular conditions in lung cancer may be responsible to elevate this risk. Tissue factor (TF) over-expression is considered to be the most important element in cancer-related thrombosis. Several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been implicated with this over-expression. The development of thrombosis in a cancer patient adversely influences prognosis. The use of prophylactic anticoagulation in lung cancer patients has been investigated but no consensus has been obtained regarding which patients are more likely to benefit. Models exist that can help predict this risk, but validation is required. Treatment guidelines of anticoagulation in patients who develop a thrombotic event are also discussed, but lung cancer patients have distinct characteristics that have to be taken in consideration. It is of great importance to identify the elements that will predict the risk of developing cancer-associated thrombosis because it will consequently influence the management and prognosis of the patient.

Emepepimut-S for non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy as a possible therapeutic option for cancer has been of great importance due to the innovative development of vaccines. Various molecules have been tested and emepepimut-S (Biomira Liposomal Peptide 25 (BLP 25)) has emerged as an option, particularly in lung cancer. AREAS COVERED: A PubMed literature and ClinicalTrials.gov search was conducted using the terms: emepepimut, BLP25, NSCLC, cancer immunotherapy, cancer vaccine and MUC1. This review covers how emepepimut-S acts against the mucin 1 (MUC1) tumor-associated antigen producing a cellular immune response against the cells that express MUC1 and the most important clinical data available that led to the ongoing Phase III trial. EXPERT OPINION: The results obtained in the Phase I/II trials are promising, showing a favorable toxicity with a benefit in survival in NSCLC patients. As future trials develop, demonstration of the long-term survival benefit, understanding of the various mechanisms of immune response initiated by the drug and the selection of patients that will highly benefit from the immunotherapy will be elucidated. The safety and extension in survival makes emepepimut-S a very interesting drug and could, therefore, offer a possibility of treatment and maintenance, particularly for good performance status patients with locally advanced NSCLC.