RESUMEN
Background: Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is a significant complication for children receiving treatment for leukaemia, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Recent regional paediatric epidemiological IFD data are lacking. Additionally uncertainty remains regarding the optimal prophylactic approach in this context. Methods: In a multi-centre Australian cohort study of children diagnosed with de novo acute leukaemia between 1st January 2017 and 30th June 2020, we characterised antifungal prophylaxis prescribing and IFD prevalence. Impact of antifungal prophylaxis was assessed using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazards regression adjusting for known IFD risk factors. Findings: A total of 434 children were included (47.2% female; median age 5.0 years, median follow-up 240 days). This cohort included 351 children with ALL (214 high-risk [HR-ALL]; 137 standard-risk [SR-ALL]), and 73 with AML. The prevalence of proven/probable IFD was 6.8% for AML, 14.0% for HR-ALL and 4.4% for SR-ALL. A mould was implicated as the causative pathogen in almost two thirds of cases. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed in 98.7% of chemotherapy cycles for AML, 56.7% for HR-ALL and 14.9% for SR-ALL. A mould-active agent was used in 77.4% of AML cycles and 21.2% of HR-ALL cycles. Mould-active prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of IFD overall and increased IFD-free survival in AML. Interpretation: These data demonstrate the persistent high regional burden of IFD in children with HR-ALL, and the potential for mould-active prophylaxis to ameliorate this. Strategies to increase uptake of appropriate prophylaxis are required in this cohort. Funding: This study was supported by a Perth Children's Hospital Foundation grant (PCHF9973).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care decision support, embedded into electronic medical record (EMR) workflows, has the potential to improve efficiency, reduce unwarranted variation and improve patient outcomes. A clinical-facing best practice advisory (BPA) in the Epic EMR system was developed to identify children admitted with low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) who should be considered for treatment at home after a brief inpatient stay. We evaluated the accuracy and impact of this BPA and identify areas for improvement. METHODS: The low-risk FN BPA was co-designed with key-stakeholders and implemented after a one-month testing phase. Mixed methodology was used to collect and analyse data. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the BPA was calculated using FN episodes captured in a prospectively collected database. Overall effectiveness was defined as the proportion of alerts resulting in completion of a FN risk assessment flowsheet. RESULTS: Over the 12-month period 176 FN episodes were admitted. Overall, the alert had poor sensitivity (58%) and positive predictive value (75%), failing to trigger in 62 (35%) episodes. In the episodes where the alert did trigger, the alert was frequently dismissed by clinicians (76%) and the overall effectiveness was extremely low (3%). Manual review of each FN episode without a BPA identified important design limitations and incorrect workflow assumptions. DISCUSSION: Given the poor sensitivity and limited impact on clinician behaviour the low-risk BPA, in its current form, has not been an effective intervention at this site. While work is ongoing to enhance the accuracy of the BPA, alternative EMR workflows are likely required to improve the clinical impact.