Recovery and trauma among urban African Americans with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic experiences are prevalent among people with serious mental illness and can significantly worsen outcomes. This study aimed to identify an urban cluster of trauma types, compare continuous distress ratings versus categorical experience of trauma for predicting outcomes such as depression and quality of life, and investigate the mediating role of recovery orientation in the impact of trauma exposure on outcomes. METHOD: Data came from an intervention study on African Americans with serious mental illness living in a large urban area; 212 participants completed baseline self-report measures of past trauma experiences, related distress levels, recovery, depression, and quality of life. Data were assessed using correlations and regressive path modeling. RESULTS: Overall, 56.6% of participants reported experiences with trauma. Analyses suggested an urban cluster of trauma types that was self-reported by over 25% of participants. Distress due to trauma strongly correlated with greater depression as well as reduced quality of life and recovery. Interestingly, the categorical presence of trauma history (yes/no) had no significant relationship with any outcomes. Path analyses revealed that recovery mediated the impact of trauma distress on depression and quality of life, specifically implicating the recovery subfactor of hope. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Results suggested that cognitive reframing focused on positive appraisals of overall recovery, and the hope subfactor can have a positive influence on trauma outcomes. The study supported the role of recovery in posttraumatic growth and suggests that hope can be used to help patients process trauma healthily. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The power of community-based participatory research (CBPR).

OBJECTIVE: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is based on power as fundamental to doing research. It evolved as a way of "knowing" from the broader idea of natural science. While previously viewed as objective, natural science is now understood as, at least, partially socially constructed. METHOD: History of research and epistemology is reviewed in terms of science. More specifically, we delve into science as social construction and how this conceptually opens the door to considering power in its processes. We then unpack CBPR as one way to do mental health research that artfully weaves power into method. RESULTS: Natural science has evolved from believing scientism (i.e., the scientific method) is sufficient to describe physical and social phenomena to terms of social constructivism; namely, the social processes that impact investigators are necessary to understand science and its product. This highlights the role of power; namely, investigator choices about hypotheses, methods, analyses, and interpretations influence the products of individual studies. The recovery movement is the embodiment of power that significantly changed research and rehabilitation in mental health. CBPR has emerged to include people with lived experience in the research enterprise. CBPR is partnership among people with lived experience, health scientists, and service providers in all facets of doing research. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Integrating CBPR into rehabilitation science has led to findings and actions that better serve community objectives. Continuing to weave CBPR into research and development will further enhance recovery in practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Introduction to the special section on community-based participatory research (CBPR) and recovery.

Voices of people with lived experience led to a recovery-based revolution in rehabilitation practices and principles. Hence, these same voices must be included as partners in the research enterprise meant to evaluate ongoing developments in this area. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is the one way to do this. CBPR is not really new to the rehabilitation arena; Rogers and Palmer-Erbs highlighted the paradigm shift in rehabilitation research calling for participatory action research (PAR). PAR is action-oriented and rooted in partnerships between people with lived experience, service providers, and intervention researchers. This special section briefly highlights important topics that highlight the continued need for CBPR in our research enterprise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Understanding Peerness in Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Care.

Emotional and interpersonal support systems are fundamental to recovery-oriented support programs. Peerness represents the quality of shared lived experience that enhances such support programs. Through peerness, providers of formal peer support (FPS) strategically disclose their lived experience to help service recipients reach their goals. FPS disclosure is limited compared with the kind of free sharing in mutual support programs, with FPS focusing on information that specifically helps service recipients on their recovery journey. Peerness has additional value for shared experiences relevant for diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. This Open Forum also considers where peerness conceptually fits into research of recovery-based services.

Weight Self-Efficacy and Recovery Among African-Americans With Serious Mental Illness and High Body Weight.

ABSTRACT: Many African-Americans with serious mental illness fail to engage in evidence-based programs that positively affect weight management. We examined how having a weight-related physical illness correlated with self-efficacy, recovery, and quality of life by contrasting illnesses with symptoms that are obviously perceived ( e.g. , sleep apnea and pain related to weight) versus those that are not ( e.g. , hypertension). African-Americans with serious mental illness who were overweight (body mass index ≥25) completed the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire, Recovery Assessment Scale, and Quality of Life Scale in this study assessing the impact of a program on weight and health. Silent weight-related physical disorders were not found to correlate with quality of life, recovery, or weight self-efficacy. Differences in recovery were found in people with versus without sleep apnea and weight-related pain. Findings suggest future directions for affirming approaches to promote engagement among African-Americans with serious mental illness in weight management programs.

Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) for people with mental illness in Hong Kong: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Self-stigma among people with mental illness is negatively associated with personal and clinical recovery. Due to the concealable nature of mental illness, people with mental illness experience constant struggles between concealment and disclosure. Disclosure of mental health challenges can potentially minimize negative impacts of self-stigma and enhance self-esteem and sense of empowerment. Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) is a peer-led intervention that promotes autonomous and dignified decisions about disclosure. PURPOSE: This study examined the effectiveness of HOP on concealment motivation, empowerment, self-stigma, stigma stress, and recovery among people with lived experience of mental illness in Hong Kong. METHODOLOGY: A total of 162 participants with a mean age of 45.38 were recruited and randomized into intervention group and waitlist control group. Participants in the intervention group were invited to attend a 6-session HOP group intervention. RESULTS: Significant improvement in optimism score from the empowerment scale was found in the intervention group compared to the waitlist control group and the effect was sustained at 1-month follow-up. However, significant changes were not found in other outcome variables. CONCLUSION: Only improvement in optimism was observed in the current study. Future study needs to examine the effects of HOP with further modification to maximize the benefit for people with lived experience of mental illness in the local context.

Does the peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program reduce stigma's impact for everyone? An individual participant data meta-regression analysis.

PURPOSE: Many people with mental illness experience self-stigma and stigma-related stress and struggle with decisions whether to disclose their condition to others. The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) group program supports them in their disclosure decisions. In randomized controlled trials, HOP has shown positive effects on self-stigma and stigma stress on average. This study examined individual predictors of HOP outcomes and tested the hypothesis that stigma stress reduction at the end of HOP mediates positive HOP effects at follow-up. METHODS: Six RCTs were included with data at baseline, post (after the HOP program) and at 3- or 4-week follow-up. Baseline variables were entered in meta-regression models to predict change in self-stigma, stigma stress, depressive symptoms and quality of life among HOP participants. Mediation models examined change in stigma stress (post) as a mediator of HOP effects on self-stigma, depressive symptoms, and quality of life at follow-up. RESULTS: More shame at baseline, and for some outcomes reduced empowerment, predicted reduced HOP effects on stigma stress, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. Younger age was related to greater improvements in stigma stress after the HOP program. Stigma stress reductions at the end of HOP mediated positive effects on self-stigma, depressive symptoms and quality of life at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Participants who are initially less burdened by shame may benefit more from HOP. Stigma stress reduction could be a key mechanism of change that mediates effects on more distal outcomes. Implications for the further development of HOP are discussed.

Cross-cultural adaptation of four instruments to measure stigma towards people with mental illness and substance use problems among primary care professionals in Chile.

Stigma toward people with mental illness and substance use problems is a significant global concern, and prevents people with these conditions from accessing treatment, particularly in primary health care (PHC) settings. Stigma is a cultural phenomenon that is influenced by particular contexts and can differ by country and region. The majority of stigma research focuses on Europe or North America leading to a lack of culturally relevant stigma research instruments for the Latin American context. The present study describes and discusses the methodology for cross-culturally adapting four stigma measurement scales to the Chilean context. The cross-cultural adaptation process included nine phases: (1) preparation; (2) independent translations; (3) synthesis 1 with expert committee; (4) focus groups and interviews with researchers, PHC professionals, and PHC users; (5) synthesis 2 with expert committee; (6) independent back translations; (7) synthesis 3 with expert committee; (8) pilot with PHC professionals; and (9) final revisions. The adaptation process included an array of diverse voices from the PHC context, and met three adaptation objectives defined prior to beginning the process (Understandability, Relevance, and Acceptability and Answer Options). The resulting, culturally adapted questionnaire is being validated and implemented within PHC settings across Chile to provide in-depth insight into stigma among PHC professionals in the country. The authors hope it will be useful for future research on mental illness and substance use stigma in similar settings across Latin America.

How do Americans perceive the stigma of leprosy?

The stigma of leprosy will have reduced effects if people cannot reliably perceive it. Two factors impact these perceptions: familiarity and entitativity. One hundred and forty-five participants tested this assertion using an online platform to complete measures of stigma about leprosy as well as measures of familiarity and entitativity. The group of 145 completed the same measures of stigma, entitativity, and familiarity 1 week later. Standard deviations of time 1 and time 2 measures of stigma were used as indices of consistent (reliable) perceptions at the individual level. Results showed partial support for familiarity being positively associated with reliable responding. Moreover, high entitativity scores were associated with greater stigma perceptions at time 1 and time 2. Ongoing research on these indicators may be important in crafting future anti-stigma programs for leprosy.

Peer Navigators for the Health Needs of People of Color With Serious Mental Illness.

People with serious mental illness die up to 20 years younger than others in the same age group, with people of color showing even earlier death. The social disadvantages experienced by this group-for example, poverty, criminal legal involvement, and immigration-are further determinants of this disparity. Peer health navigators (PHNs) are people with experiences of recovery who may share a racial-ethnic background, history of poverty, experience with criminal legal systems, or immigration status with current patients and who assist in practical and timely tasks that help people engage with fragmented health systems. This column describes the PHN practice, including the putative components that define it.

The stigma of alcohol-related liver disease and its impact on healthcare.

People with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) experience stigma and discrimination. This review summarises the evidence on stigma in healthcare and its implications for people with ALD, drawing from the literature on the stigma associated with mental illness and, specifically, alcohol use disorder (AUD). Public stigma, self-stigma and structural stigma all contribute to failure to seek help or delays in seeking help, inferior healthcare, and negative health outcomes, which increase the overall burden of ALD. Stigma can be experienced, but also anticipated and avoided, with both scenarios negatively impacting on ALD healthcare. Blaming people with ALD for their condition is central to the stigma of ALD. Stigma affects ALD healthcare at all stages, from prevention, early detection and intervention, to allocation of scarce resources in liver transplantation. People with lived experience need to be empowered to lead action against the stigmatisation of patients with ALD. Promulgating a dynamic model of individual and social responsibility for AUD, a continuum model of harmful alcohol use, and establishing training on ALD-related stigma for healthcare professionals are strategies to address stigma. Integrating addiction and ALD services, providing stigma-free prevention, and overcoming the frequent separation of addiction services from general healthcare are necessary. Beyond healthcare, addressing social inequality, the social dimensions of ALD risk and outcomes, and ensuring equal access to services is necessary to improve outcomes for all people with ALD. More research is needed on the stigma of ALD in low- and middle-income countries and in countries with restrictive drinking norms. Interventions to reduce the stigma of ALD and facilitate early help-seeking need to be developed and evaluated.

Debate: Stigma implications for diagnosing personality disorders in adolescents.

Diagnosing personality disorders (PDs) in adolescence is a complex and often controversial decision. While early diagnosis provides a pathway to treatment, stigmatizing labels might unintentionally increase prejudice and discrimination for youth and their families, resulting in harm and treatment avoidance. In this paper, we outline stigma-related considerations for diagnosing PDs in adolescence, including types of stigma (public stigma, self-stigma, associative stigma) and moderators of stigma (continuum beliefs, biogenetic attributions, PD sub-diagnosis). Research indicates that PDs are among the most stigmatizing diagnoses in adults, particularly among healthcare providers. Experiences with stigma may differentially impact adolescents, who are undergoing rapid changes in identity development and profound influences from educational systems, peers, and social media. Youth who receive mental health services (especially those embedded in schools) worry about whether and how to talk about a diagnosis. However, adolescents with significant behavioral symptoms are often seen as different from their peers even prior to a formal diagnosis. Systematic efforts are needed to anticipate and mitigate stigma-related impacts on adolescents who might be diagnosed with PDs.

Perceptions of difference and disdain on the self-stigma of mental illness.

BACKGROUND: People with mental illness are viewed as different and disdained by the general population leading to public stigma. When public stigma becomes internalized, it results in self-stigma. Content-less measures of stigma have shown to benefit studying public stigma, but research on self-stigma is limited. AIMS: This study sought to validate the use of content-less measures (Difference and Disdain) to assess self-stigma of mental illness. METHODS: Participants with lived experience (N = 291) completed a survey including measures of Difference and Disdain for self-stigma and outcomes assessing depression, self-esteem, recovery and the "Why Try" effect. Factor structure of Difference and Disdain across stages of self-stigma and their effects on harmful outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Factor structure was not supported. Reliability analysis suggested a two-stage conceptualization of self-stigma for Difference and Disdain characterized by early (i.e. aware, agree) and late stages (i.e. apply, harm). Disdain was found to independently contribute to significant harmful outcomes, especially in the late stages. CONCLUSIONS: Disdain seems to be the driver of the egregious effects of self-stigma for people with mental illness. Anti-stigma efforts should focus on stereotypes of Disdain in the future.

Reducing stigma toward mental illness and substance use issues in primary health care in Chile: Protocol of a cluster controlled trial study.

Background: Chile is implementing a Community Mental Health Model with a strong role of primary health care (PHC). PHC has great potential to early detection and provision of accessible and coordinated services to people who present mental illness and/or substance use issues (MISUI). However, stigma toward people with MISUI among PHC professionals is a significant barrier to accessing good quality of care. A wealth of literature supports the importance of reducing stigma for this population. The main goal of this research project is to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive anti-stigma intervention in reducing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors among PHC providers toward individuals with MISUI in the Chilean context, using Centros de Salud Familiar (CESFAMs) as the point of intervention. Methods: The intervention is based on an initiative that was previously developed in Canada and then also pilot-tested in Lima, Peru, with the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (Ontario, Canada). The model will be culturally adapted with CESFAM PHC provider and user inputs to be relevant and valid to Chile. The 18-month intervention includes five (5) components that are simultaneously implemented in CESFAMs: (1) Develop a Team of Local Champions in each intervention CESFAM, comprising PHC providers and users; (2) Analysis of Internal CESFAM Policies, Procedures, and Protocols to determine areas of improvement in service delivery for individuals with MISUI; (3) Raising Awareness of stigma toward MISUI using various forms of media within the CESFAM; (4) Innovative Contact-Based Education workshops on anti-stigma and recovery principles, co-lead by academic/clinical trainers and a person with lived experience of MISUI; and (5) Recovery-Based Arts, a multi-week arts workshop for PHC providers and users to produce artwork related to MISUI and recovery, culminating in an exhibition to showcase artwork for the CESFAM providers, users, and community. The expected intervention outcomes are the following: Participation in the experimental group will result in a significant decrease in stigmatizing attitudes among PHC providers toward individuals with MISUI compared with the control group as measured by the Chilean version of the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers Scale (OMS-HC); Participation in the experimental group will result in a significant decrease of PHC users experiences of stigma conveyed by PHC providers compared with the control group as measured by the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale, validated for the Chilean population. The changes in attitudes and behaviors within the experimental group will be sustained over time as measured at 6 months-follow-up. To evaluate the effectiveness of this 18-month intervention, a 4-year, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial is proposed, with CESFAMs being the unit of randomization (or "cluster"). Implementation Science approach will be taken to measure relevant implementation outcomes for each component of the intervention, and through qualitative data collection with CESFAM providers and authorities. Data analysis will be carried out using SAS 9.4 (specifically, using POC MIXED and PROC GENMOD) and R 3.5. Mixed-effect modeling will used for both PHC provider and user data, which will include individuals and CESFAMs as random effects and group (intervention/control) as fixed effects. Discussion: This study represents a new stage of relevant and innovative research in mental health and stigma in Chile that will contribute to improving access and quality of care for people with MISUI. Evaluating the impact of the intervention model and its implementation will provide the necessary tools to scale the intervention up to other CESFAMs across Chile. Clinical trial registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05578066].

The Impact of Contact and Fame on Changing the Public Stigma of Mental Illness.

Many famous people have disclosed their mental illness to erase the harmful effects of stigma. This study examines the relative impact of disclosure stories from people who are or are not celebrities. We expected noncelebrities would be viewed as more similar and likeable and therefore have greater effects on stigma change. Research participants from an MTurk panel viewed self-disclosure stories from celebrity, Mariah Carey, or noncelebrity, Malia Fontecchio. Participants completed the Difference and Disdain Scale prior to reviewing the vignettes and immediately after each one. Participants also completed scales representing perceptions of fame, dissimilarity, and likeability of the person in each story. Results supported hypotheses: Mariah Carey was perceived as more famous, more dissimilar, and less likeable than Malia Fontecchio. Reading the Malia Fontecchio story led to greater improvement in disdain stigma than the Mariah Carey story. Implications for the varied role of celebrity status in stigma change are discussed.

Attitudes towards disclosing a mental illness: impact on quality of life and recovery.

PURPOSE: The decision whether to disclose a mental illness has individual and social consequences. Secrecy may protect from stigma and discrimination while disclosure can increase social support and facilitate help-seeking. Therefore, disclosure decisions are a key reaction to stigma. The first aim of this study was to test a newly developed scale to measure disclosure attitudes, the Attitudes to Disclosure Questionnaire (AtDQ). The second aim was to examine the impact of attitudes towards disclosing a mental illness on quality of life and recovery. METHODS: Among 100 participants with mental illness, disclosure attitudes, quality of life, recovery, benefits of disclosure, secrecy, social withdrawal, self-stigma, and depressive symptoms were assessed at weeks 0, 3 and 6. Psychometric properties of the AtDQ were analysed. Longitudinal associations between disclosure attitudes at baseline and quality of life and recovery after 6 weeks were examined in linear regressions. RESULTS: The analyses of the AtDQ indicated one-factor solutions, high acceptability, high internal consistency, and good retest reliability for the total scale and the subscales as well as high construct validity of the total scale. Results provided initial support for sensitivity to change. More positive disclosure attitudes in general and in particular regarding to family at baseline predicted better quality of life and recovery after 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: The current study provides initial support for the AtDQ as a useful measure of disclosure attitudes. Disclosing a mental illness, especially with respect to family, may improve quality of life and recovery of people with mental illness.

"Supporting Wellness": A depression and bipolar support alliance mixed-methods investigation of lived experience perspectives and priorities for mood disorder treatment.

BACKGROUND: The lived experience of people with mood disorders may be leveraged to inform priorities for research, define key treatment outcomes, and support decision-making in clinical care. The aim of this mixed-methods project was to provide insight into how people with depression and bipolar disorder experience the impact of symptoms, their treatment preferences, and their definitions of wellness. METHODS: The project was implemented in two phases. In Phase 1, community-based participatory research was used to develop a web-based survey enquiring about living with a mood disorder, treatment experiences, and wellness priorities. In Phase 2, a series of focus groups were conducted to explore aspects of wellness in greater detail. RESULTS: Respondents (n= 6153) described the symptoms of mood disorders as having a significant, chronic impact on their lives. A holistic approach to treatment was desired by participants, but not necessarily experienced. Qualitative findings were used to further describe four highly ranked wellness priorities identified in the survey: ability to act independently or according to my own will; purpose in life; getting through the day; and contentment. LIMITATIONS: Experience of a mood disorder was self-reported, and no formal confirmation of diagnosis occurred. Although the survey could not incorporate all possible wellness definitions, this was supplemented by qualitative focus groups. CONCLUSION: The present findings provide important insights from the perspectives of individuals with lived experience of mood disorders. Implications of this for research and clinical practice are discussed, particularly with regards to measurement-based care and use of wellness-oriented clinical outcome assessments.

Formal peer-support services that address priorities of people with psychiatric disabilities: A systematic review.

Formal peer-support services are provided by people with shared lived experience of serious mental illness and recovery to help others with psychiatric disabilities address their priorities in, among other things, transitioning from hospitals, dealing with physical health, and illness management/recovery. This article summarizes a systematic review of the impact of formal peer services on these priorities. We used PRISMA Guidelines to review the existing research literature from 1995 to 2020; the first wave of our review yielded 424 studies which were then reduced to 68 quantitative investigations included for coding and syntheses. A graph of the trajectory of published articles per 5-year period showed a steady increase up to 2015 when the frequency of studies then leveled out. Using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as one index of design quality, we found more than two-thirds of studies included an RCT. We used inferential analyses based on primary impact as defined by hypotheses as outcome indicator. Four of 68 studies suggested iatrogenic effects of peer services related to hospitalization, physical quality of life, and employment. A frequency of significant positive benefits for outcome ranged from 46.2% to 100% of findings. Future research should seek to identify personal-level factors that indicate greater benefits for peer support; this provides direction for tailoring the intervention. Personal-level variables include the role of diversity and social disadvantage in the benefits of formal peer-support programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Internalization process of stigma of people with mental illness across cultures: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach.

This meta-analytic study synthesized findings from 108 independent data sets across 22 cultures to investigate whether the stigma internalization model (the internalization of experienced stigma and perceived stigma to self-stigma) is associated with well-being and recovery of people with mental illness. We also examined the moderating role of collectivism in the internalization process. Results of the meta-analytic structural equation modeling suggested that self-stigma is a significant mediator in the relationships between experienced stigma and perceived stigma with well-being and recovery variables (indirect effects = 0.02 to -0.16). Experienced and perceived stigma had significant direct effects on well-being and recovery variables (Bs = 0.07 to -0.21, p < 0.05), suggesting that both external (e.g., public stigma) and internal (i.e., self-stigma) influences of stigma work concurrently to affect recovery and well-being of people with mental illness. The results of the mixed effect three-level meta-analytic models showed that collectivism significantly moderated the relationship between experienced and perceived stigma with self-stigma (Bs = 0.06 to 0.11, p < 0.05). This implied that the more collectivistic a culture is, the stronger the correlation between experienced and perceived stigma with self-stigma. Implications to stigma reduction approaches were discussed.