Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
4.
Int J Public Health ; 63(5): 557-565, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679104

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, jointly with Public Health England, have developed a guideline on outdoor air pollution and its links to health. The guideline makes recommendations on local interventions that can help improve air quality and prevent a range of adverse health outcomes associated with road-traffic-related air pollution. METHODS: The guideline was based on a rigorous assessment of the scientific evidence by an independent advisory committee, with input from public health professionals and other professional groups. The process included systematics reviews of the literature, expert testimonies and stakeholder consultation. RESULTS: The guideline includes recommendations for local planning, clean air zones, measures to reduce emissions from public sector transport services, smooth driving and speed reduction, active travel, and awareness raising. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline recommends taking a number of actions in combination, because multiple interventions, each producing a small benefit, are likely to act cumulatively to produce significant change. These actions are likely to bring multiple public health benefits, in addition to air quality improvements.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/normas , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Guías como Asunto , Salud Pública , Participación de la Comunidad , Inglaterra , Humanos
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(12): 2081-2084, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148368

RESUMEN

In December 2014, Ebola virus disease (EVD) was diagnosed in a healthcare worker in the United Kingdom after the worker returned from an Ebola treatment center in Sierra Leone. The worker flew on 2 flights during the early stages of disease. Follow-up of 238 contacts showed no evidence of secondary transmission of Ebola virus.


Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto , Brotes de Enfermedades , Ebolavirus/patogenicidad , Personal de Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/virología , Adulto , Aeronaves , Ebolavirus/fisiología , Femenino , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/terapia , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/transmisión , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Sierra Leona/epidemiología , Viaje , Reino Unido/epidemiología
8.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0125955, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26017538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We report a widespread foodborne outbreak of Cryptosporidium parvum in England and Scotland in May 2012. Cases were more common in female adults, and had no history of foreign travel. Over 300 excess cases were identified during the period of the outbreak. Speciation and microbiological typing revealed the outbreak strain to be C. parvum gp60 subtype IIaA15G2R1. METHODS: Hypothesis generation questionnaires were administered and an unmatched case control study was undertaken to test the hypotheses raised. Cases and controls were interviewed by telephone. Controls were selected using sequential digit dialling. Information was gathered on demographics, foods consumed and retailers where foods were purchased. RESULTS: Seventy-four laboratory confirmed cases and 74 controls were included in analyses. Infection was found to be strongly associated with the consumption of pre-cut mixed salad leaves sold by a single retailer. This is the largest documented outbreak of cryptosporidiosis attributed to a food vehicle.


Asunto(s)
Criptosporidiosis/epidemiología , Cryptosporidium parvum/patogenicidad , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Criptosporidiosis/parasitología , Cryptosporidium parvum/genética , Brotes de Enfermedades , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactuca/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hojas de la Planta/parasitología , Escocia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
13.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 33(2): 234-45, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20884643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Social Determinants of Health has urged governments across the world to promote health equity by reducing the gap between the most and least deprived individuals in society. Some of this gap can be bridged by promoting healthy lifestyles through targeted Public Health policy and interventions. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses of data on behavioural risk factors, individual socioeconomic factors and neighbourhood deprivation score collected from 26 290 adults aged over 16 years who participated in the 2008 East of England Lifestyle Survey. RESULTS: After adjustment for individual socioeconomic factors, across quintiles of increasing neighbourhood deprivation, participants were more likely to smoke and less likely to consume five portions of fruit and vegetables on five or more days of the week (least deprived versus most deprived quintile: odds ratios for not smoking 0.45 (0.41-0.50); and fruit and vegetable consumption 0.70 (0.64-0.76), P-trend <0.0001). Greater neighbourhood deprivation and lower occupational social class were independently associated with a lower summary healthy lifestyle score (both P-trend <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Public health interventions aimed at reducing health inequalities by targeting behavioural risk factors may focus in particular on reducing smoking and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in more deprived communities.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Estilo de Vida , Clase Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
16.
BMC Public Health ; 6: 297, 2006 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17156421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective health protection requires systematised responses with clear accountabilities. In England, Primary Care Trusts and the Health Protection Agency both have statutory responsibilities for health protection. A Memorandum of Understanding identifies responsibilities of both parties, but there is a potential lack of clarity about responsibility for specific health protection functions. We aimed to investigate professionals' perceptions of responsibility for different health protection functions, to inform future guidance for, and organisation of, health protection in England. METHODS: We sent a postal questionnaire to all health protection professionals in England from the following groups: (a) Directors of Public Health in Primary Care Trusts; (b) Directors of Health Protection Units within the Health Protection Agency; (c) Directors of Public Health in Strategic Health Authorities and; (d) Regional Directors of the Health Protection Agency RESULTS: The response rate exceeded 70%. Variations in perceptions of who should be, and who is, delivering health protection functions were observed within, and between, the professional groups (a)-(d). Concordance in views of which organisation should, and which does deliver was high (> or =90%) for 6 of 18 health protection functions, but much lower (< or =80%) for 6 other functions, including managing the implications of a case of meningitis out of hours, of landfill environmental contamination, vaccination in response to mumps outbreaks, nursing home infection control, monitoring sexually transmitted infections and immunisation training for primary care staff. The proportion of respondents reporting that they felt confident most or all of the time in the safe delivery of a health protection function was strongly correlated with the concordance (r = 0.65, P = 0.0038). CONCLUSION: Whilst we studied professionals' perceptions, rather than actual responses to incidents, our study suggests that there are important areas of health protection where consistent understanding of responsibility for delivery is lacking. There are opportunities to clarify the responsibility for health protection in England, perhaps learning from the approaches used for those health protection functions where we found consistent perceptions of accountability.


Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración en Salud Pública , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Responsabilidad Social , Adulto , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Inglaterra , Salud Ambiental/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Capacitación en Servicio/organización & administración , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Regionalización , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...