A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Drugs used in obstetric patients must accomplish two goals: efficacy and safety for both mother and fetus. Neostigmine has been co-administered epidurally and intrathecally with local anesthetics and other adjuncts in the obstetric setting. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and incidence of adverse events related to the use of neostigmine in obstetric anesthesia. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled human trials was conducted using the data sources Google Scholar and PubMed (updated 1 November 2014). Inclusion criteria were: random allocation to treatment; comparison of neostigmine or neostigmine with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants versus placebo or placebo with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants; and approval by an ethics committee. RESULTS: The use of neostigmine as an adjuvant in neuraxial anesthesia is associated with a reduction in the dose of local anesthetic during labor analgesia and postoperative analgesia following cesarean section: mean reduction of local anesthetic (ropivacaine or bupivacaine) vs. control -4.08 (95% CI -6.7 to -1.5) mg/h (P=0.002). The risk of nausea was increased vs. control with intrathecal neostigmine (OR 8.99 [95% CI 4.74 to 17.05], P <0.001) but not with epidural neostigmine (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.46 to 2.05], P=0.94). Use of neuraxial neostigmine was associated with a decrease in the risk of pruritus but there was no increase in the incidence of hypotension, dizziness or sedation and no effect on the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns or Apgar scores. CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial administration of neostigmine significantly reduces local anesthetic consumption without serious adverse side effects to the mother or fetus. However, neostigmine is only recommended for epidural administration as intrathecal use significantly increases the incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting.

Pituitary apoplexy after laparoscopic surgery: a case report.

The occurrence of unprobable adverse events during laparoscopic surgery has increased over the years. Among them, pituitary apoplexy has been reported only twice. The increase in the abdominal pressure might play a role in the pituitary apoplexy, as well as hemodynamic instability, anticoagulant drugs and air-embolism due to insufflation of CO2 during pneumoperitoneum. We report a case of pituitary apoplexy during laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon.

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in impaired renal function: is it time for a dose adjustment? A case report and review of literature.

PURPOSE: Thrombocytopenia is a common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU), but the incidence of drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DIT) is not well defined. We investigate linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with impaired renal function. Since recent studies suggest that linezolid clearance is reduced in these patients and there are no precise data confirming that dose-adjustment should be required, we performed a systematic analysis in order to establish whether it is necessary to consider a dose adjustment and promote studies to confirm this concept. METHODS: We report a case of thrombocytopenia (nadir 32 × 10(3)/µl) in a patient with acute kidney injury who was treated with linezolid for a MRSA pulmonary infection. We performed a systematic review of the literature through PubMed with the aim to include every case report, case series, prospective and retrospective clinical study reporting linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia with concomitant impaired renal function. RESULTS: An increasing number of clinical studies suggest a correlation between the onset of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia and renal dysfunction. Close monitoring of platelet count and hemoglobin is recommended in patients treated with linezolid, especially in those with impaired renal function because the reduction of its clearance causes drug accumulation, as some studies have reported. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider the potential risk of this complication, especially in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Further studies should be encouraged to determine if the incidence of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia could be reduced by a dose adjustment according to renal function, for which currently there is still no specific recommendation.

Do on- and off-pump coronary bypass surgery differently affect perioperative peripheral tissue metabolism?

BACKGROUND: Microdialysis allows the in-vivo assessment of interstitial fluids. We studied the metabolic status of peripheral tissues (skeletal muscle) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery on- (CABG) or off-pump (OPCAB). METHODS: Twenty patients candidates to elective coronary bypass surgery were randomly assigned to undergo CABG or OPCAB. A microdialysis catheter was inserted in the left deltoid muscle before surgery and left in place for 24 hours, and metabolic markers of peripheral tissue perfusion (glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol and lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratio) were assessed before, at the end, and 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative clinical features were similar in both groups. Interstitial levels of glucose and lactate increased over time, being in both groups significantly higher than baseline 24 hours after surgery, whereas glycerol levels did not change over time and between groups. In addition, there was an increase over time of pyruvate levels which were significantly higher in CABG after surgery, whereas L/P ratio was significantly higher in OPCAB 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSION: Metabolic changes after coronary bypass surgery occur with some differences related to CPB use. Overall, these changes suggest that, after coronary surgery, a certain degree of hypermetabolic state ensues, lasting up to 24 hours after surgery; the postoperative increase in pyruvate levels in CABG patients, together with the changes in L/P ratio occurring only in OPCAB patients implies an higher risk of tissue hypoperfusion/ischemia for patients submitted to OPCAB, although this does not lead to permanent cellular damage, as the markers of this complication (e.g., glycerol) do not change over time.