Hepatic venous reconstruction of the left lateral segment with emphasis on anomalous hepatic vein in pediatric liver transplantation.

Left lateral segment grafts have become a suitable option in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT). The correlation between hepatic vein (HV) reconstruction and outcome is relevant when assessing the safe use of these grafts. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records prospectively collected from a pediatric living donor liver transplantation database and conducted a comparative analysis of the different left lateral segment graft types according to HV reconstruction. Donor, recipient, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. Post-transplant outcomes included vascular complications such as hepatic vein outflow obstruction, early (≤30 d) and late (>30 d) PVT, hepatic artery thrombosis, and graft survival. From February 2017 to August 2021, 303 PLTs were performed. According to venous anatomy, the distribution of the left lateral segment was as follows: single HV (type I) in 174 (57.4%), close HVs, simple venoplasty for reconstruction (type II) in 97 (32.01%), anomalous hepatic vein (AHV) with a distance between the HVs orifices that allowed simple venoplasty (type IIIA) in 25 (8.26%) and AHV with a distance between the HVs orifices requiring homologous venous graft interposition (type IIIB) in 07 (2.31%) grafts. Type IIIB grafts came from male donors ( p =0.04) and had a higher mean donor height ( p =0.008), a higher mean graft weight, and a higher graft-to-recipient weight ratio, both p =0.002. The median follow-up time was 41.4 months. The overall cumulative graft survival was 96.3%, and comparative graft survival showed no difference (log-rank p =0.61). No hepatic vein outflow obstructions were observed in this cohort study. There was no statistically significant difference in the post-transplant outcomes between the graft types. The venous reconstruction of the AHV with homologous venous graft interposition had similar outcomes in the short and long term.

Liver transplantation for hilar inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: Case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) of the liver are rare neoplasms. These tumors are difficult to distinguish from other neoplasms by radiological examination, have uncertain evolution, and there is no consensus on the treatment of these lesions. Hilar tumors can involve the portal vein, hepatic artery, bile duct, and spread to the branches of the portal triad, causing obstructive symptoms, occlusive phlebitis, and portal hypertension. Thus, liver transplantation (LT) is an excellent alternative for locally advanced hilar tumors, since it ensures complete tumor resection with free margins. METHODS/RESULTS: We present a literature review and a case report showing a 3-year-old boy with liver IMT invading the hepatic hilum and inferior vena cava, who underwent a successful living donor liver transplantation that required portal vein and vena cava replacement. CONCLUSION: The incidence of hilar IMTs is low and there is no well-established standard treatment. Liver transplantation for a hilar tumor with vascular invasion was acceptable in this case because the radically of the surgery was the key for the cure, and because the tumor was benign in nature.