Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Group Stratification of Prostate Adenocarcinoma.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to further assess the clinical utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) in prostate cancer (PC) staging following 2023 clinical guideline changes, both as an independent predictor of high-stage (>T3a) or high-risk PC and when combined with patient characteristics. Methods and Materials: The present study was a retrospective review of 171 patients from 2008 to 2018 who underwent MP-MRI before radical prostatectomy at a single institution. The accuracy of clinical staging was compared between conventional staging and MP-MRI-based clinical staging. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. Linear regression analyses were used to calculate concordance (C-statistic). Results: Of the 171 patients, final pathology revealed 95 (55.6%) with T2 disease, 62 (36.3%) with T3a disease, and 14 (8.2%) with T3b disease. Compared with conventional staging, MP-MRI-based staging demonstrated significantly increased accuracy in identifying T3a disease, intermediate risk, and high/very-high-risk PC. When combined with clinical characteristics, MP-MRI-based staging improved the area under the curve from 0.753 to 0.808 (P = .0175), compared with conventional staging. Conclusions: MP-MRI improved the identification of T3a PC, intermediate-risk PC, and high- or very-high-risk PC. Further, when combined with clinical characteristics, MP-MRI-based staging significantly improved risk stratification, compared with conventional staging. These findings represent further evidence to support the integration of MP-MRI into prostate adenocarcinoma clinical staging guidelines.

Phase I/II study to evaluate consolidative hypofractionated radiation therapy for boosting the residual primary disease in combination with durvalumab after definitive chemoradiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): study protocol for a prospective trial.

Background: Recent advancements in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have confirmed the utility of adding adjuvant immunotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III disease but intrathoracic progression remains at high rate. Additional studies have sought to investigate the synergistic relationship of immunotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining consolidative hypofractionated radiation therapy (hfRT) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique for boosting the residual primary lung cancer with adjuvant anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy concurrently after completion of definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) in the rates of tumor control locoregionally and distantly. Methods: Eligible subjects with stage III NSCLC must have gross residual tumor that is smaller than 5.0 cm in maximal dimension following dCRT. Consolidative hfRT will be delivered 1 to 2 months after finishing dCRT and concurrently with adjuvant anti-PD-L1 therapy using durvalumab. Consolidative hfRT will start from 6.5 Gy ×2 fractions and dose escalate to 10 Gy ×2 fractions in a 3+3 design. At the final determined consolidative hfRT dose level, a total of 32 subjects with pathologically documented stage III NSCLC treated with two or more cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently with RT will be enrolled for data analyses. Discussion: We hypothesize that the use of consolidative hfRT directed to the residual primary lung tumor in combination with adjuvant anti-PD-L1 therapy will provide additional immunostimulation and therefore improved locoregional and distant control when compared to either modality used independently. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04748419.

COX inhibitor use during definitive radiotherapy is associated with worse hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

PURPOSE: Patients with vestibular schwannoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy commonly experience hearing loss due to tumor and treatment effects; however, there is limited data evaluating concurrent medication use and other clinicopathologic factors associated with hearing preservation during and after radiotherapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing consecutive patients from 2004 to 2019 treated with radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma at our institution. METHODS: Ninety four patients with concurrent medications, baseline audiograms, and post-radiotherapy audiograms available were evaluable. We performed chi-squared analyses of the frequency of various clinicopathologic factors and t-tests evaluating the degree of hearing loss based on audiograms. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 35.7 months (mean: 46.5 months), the baseline pure-tone average (PTA) of the ipsilateral ear worsened from 38.4 to 59.5 dB following completion of radiotherapy (difference: 21.1, 95% CI 17.8-24.4 dB, p < 0.001). 36 patients (38.3%) reported regular use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors (including acetaminophen and NSAIDs) during radiotherapy. The mean increase in PTA was significantly higher for patients taking COX inhibitors (25.8 dB vs 18.1 dB, p = 0.024) in the ipsilateral ear but not for the contralateral side. COX inhibitor use remained independently associated with worse PTA in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: COX inhibitor use during definitive radiotherapy is associated with worse hearing loss in the affected ear but not for the contralateral side. This suggests the ototoxic effects of COX inhibitors may influence the effects of radiotherapy. These results could have clinical implications and warrant further investigation.

Positive margins matter regardless of subsequent resection findings.

OBJECTIVES: In the resection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), an intraoperative positive surgical margin (SM) communicated to the head and neck surgeon necessitates further resection of the area of identified involvement to achieve a final negative SM. The prognostic implication of initial positive SM when the final SM is negative is understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 249 patients with non-metastatic (stage I-IVB) OCSCC who underwent a resection from 2010 to 2019 to assess the prognostic impact of an initial positive SM. Chi-squared analysis was used to evaluate the association between an initial positive SM and clinicopathologic parameters. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate patient outcomes with Cox regression analysis used to determine absolute hazards. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 28.4 months, the 2-year freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 82.1%, 63.5%, and 78.5%, respectively. Fifty patients (20.1%) had an initial positive SM which was revised to a negative SM on frozen and permanent sections by resecting further tissue while 12 patients (4.8%) had a final positive SM. An initial positive SM was independently associated with a worse FFLR (HR: 2.696, p = 0.004), DFS (HR: 1.57, p = 0.044), and OS (HR: 1.72, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: An initial positive SM is independently associated with worse disease control and patient survival. A positive SM may be a surrogate for diffusely infiltrative disease as further malignancy identified on the re-resection specimen was associated with worse outcomes.

Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index Association with Survival in Patients Undergoing Trimodality Therapy for Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is correlated with patient survival in various solid malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited information is available on the prognostic implication of the SII in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for stage III NSCLC. METHODS: At our institution, 81 patients underwent curative intent trimodality therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection) for stage III NSCLC from 2004 to 2019. The SII was calculated at the time of diagnosis as platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. χ2 analysis was used to compare categorical variables. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and freedom from recurrence (FFR) rates, with Cox regression used to determine absolute hazards. RESULTS: Patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation therapy to a median dose of 4,500 cGy concurrent with a median of 3 cycles of chemotherapy (most commonly carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by surgical resection (86.4% lobectomy and 13.6% pneumonectomy) with mediastinal lymph node dissection. At a median follow-up of 68.4 months, a low SII (<1,260) at diagnosis was independently associated with an improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.448, p = 0.004), DFS (HR: 0.366, p < 0.001), and FFR (HR: 0.325, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We identified that a low SII was associated with improved OS, DFS, and FFR in patients undergoing trimodality therapy for stage III NSCLC. The interplay of the immune system and lung cancer outcomes remains an active area of investigation for which further study is warranted.

Systemic inflammation is associated with inferior disease control and survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) correlates with patient survival in various types of solid malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited information is available on the prognostic implication and disease-specific survival of SII in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for stage III NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 125 patients who underwent curative intent CRT for stage III NSCLC with sufficient laboratory assessment from 2010-2019. SII was calculated at the time of diagnosis as platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare categorical variables. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), disease specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) rates, with Cox regression used to determine absolute hazards. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, 5-year OS, DSS, and PFS rates were 22.6%, 30.9%, and 13.4%, respectively. A low SII (<1,266) at diagnosis was independently associated with an improved OS (HR: 0.399, 95%, CI: 0.247-0.644, P<0.001), DSS (HR: 0.383, 95%, CI: 0.228-0.645, P<0.001), and PFS (HR: 0.616, 95%, CI: 0.407-0.932, P=0.022). We did not detect an association between SII and freedom from recurrence (FFR), freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLRR), or freedom from distant recurrence (FFDR). NSAID (1,483.4 vs. 2,302.9, P=0.038) and statin usage (1,443.9 vs. 2,201.7, P=0.046) were associated with a lower SII while COPD exacerbations (2,699.7 vs. 1,573.7, P=0.032) and antibiotic prescriptions (2,384.6 vs. 1,347.9, P=0.009) were associated with an elevated SII. These factors were not independently associated with improved survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Low SII scores were independently associated with improved OS, DSS, and PFS rates in patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing definitive CRT. NSAIDs and statin usage may be associated with lower SII at diagnosis of NSCLC. This study suggests that SII may be an effective prognostic indicator of patient mortality. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of these agents in patients with an elevated SII in this setting may be warranted.

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 72 consecutive patients who had undergone ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL at our institution from 2006 to 2014. Pretransplant conditioning consisted of HDC and total body irradiation. Of the 72 patients, 13 received post-transplant consolidative RT at the discretion of the consulted radiation oncologist. RESULTS: Consolidative RT was associated with significantly improved 2-year locoregional control (LRC) (92% vs. 68%; P = .04). However, no difference was seen in either the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (69% vs. 54%; P = .25) or overall survival (OS) (85% vs. 59%; P = .44). Analysis of the subgroup of 19 patients with persistent residual masses ≥ 2 cm on post-transplant imaging demonstrated a significant improvement in LRC (100% vs. 36%; P < .01), PFS (88% vs. 27%; P = .01), and OS (100% vs. 45%; P = .02) with consolidative RT. CONCLUSION: The use of consolidative RT after HDC and ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL appears to significantly improve LRC. For patients with masses ≥ 2 cm after ASCT, improved 2-year PFS and OS were seen. Prospective trials are needed to further identify the patients who would derive the most benefit from consolidative RT in the ASCT setting.